Monday, January 25, 2021

Why I have concerns about the COVID Vaccines

 

Despite what you may be hearing in the media, there ARE a lot of people who are dying from the COVID vaccine, and many more who are reporting adverse side effects. 

You can see the VAERS list of COVID Vaccine related injuries and deaths, on the National Vaccine Information Center's website, via this link. Have a look at the screenshot below.


Please have a look at some of these documents about vaccine safety. The ICAN network provides hundreds of references for studies.


What Every Person Needs to Know About Vaccines

Publications by the Informed Consent Action Network



A white paper is an authoritative report or guide that informs readers concisely

about a complex issue and presents the issuing body's philosophy on the matter.

It is meant to help readers understand an issue, solve a problem, or make a decision.



COVID VACCINE REACTIONS RISE WORLDWIDE


‘THE BIGGEST EXPERIMENT EVER DONE’



"You are going to plant the seed of auto immune reactions."  He says. DON'T DO THIS."  


THE KNOWN UNKNOWNS



Where is Tiffany Dover??

I would really like to know what happened to Tiffany Dover. It does seem odd to me that she hasn't given any interviews since she fainted shortly after her firsst COVID Vaccine on December 14th. I don't understand why she hasn't given any interviews at all, since she fainted. If she was so pro-vaccine, I would think she would want to come on camera to prove that she's alive and well. There are thousands of poeople trying to figure out if she is alive or not, and it just seems like if she really wannted to ensure people would stop hounding her, she would just make a quick appearance to say she is ok.



WHO LOST ON HERD IMMUNITY


WHO LOST ON HERD IMMUNITY

The World Health Organization recently changed the definition of ‘herd immunity’ on their website by stating ‘a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached,’ and also went so far as to say that herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it. What prompted them to make this change? Take a look.

#GoHerd #HerdImmunity #WHO




SAFETY SCRAPPED IN COVID TRIALS

 Less than 2 months into the #Covid19 vaccine rollout, #Pfizer and #Moderna have already begun unblinding the placebo group from their trials and encouraging them to hop in line for the vaccine. But there are serious …



UK EXPECTS ‘HIGH VOLUME’ OF COVID VACCINE ADVERSE REACTIONS




EX PFIZER VP CONCERNED ABOUT EXPERIMENTAL COVID VACCINE






APPROACHING “HERD STUPIDITY”


SAFETY SCRAPPED IN COVID TRIALS



COVID TESTING FRAUD UNCOVERED




DOCTOR DEMANDS AUDIT OF COVID DEATHS


5 COVID QUESTIONS TO WAKE YOUR WORLD


CAUSE FOR CONCERN?


COVID VACCINE INJURIES BEGIN




NEUROSCIENTIST’S CONCERNS ABOUT COVID VACCINES





HEALTH EXPERT: “STOP COVID VAX EXPERIMENTS”




REPORT A COVID-19 VACCINE INJURY




UK expects high volume of covid vaccine adverse reactions


W.H.O. lost on herd immunity

 


https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?EVENTS=on&PAGENO=17&PERPAGE=10&ESORT=&REVERSESORT=&VAX=(COVID19)&DIED=Yes


https://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/help/vaers.html

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System Summary

Summary:  Established in 1990, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a national early warning system to detect possible safety problems in U.S. licensed vaccines. VAERS is co-managed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). VAERS is a post-marketing safety surveillance program, collecting information about adverse events (possible side effects) that occur after the administration of U.S. licensed vaccines. This online database provides a nationwide mechanism by which VAERS reports are made available to the public and may be reviewed and analyzed. The VAERS data are updated weekly. and include reports processed through the previous Friday, effective December 18, 2020. On June 30, 2017, VAERS released a new reporting form, called the VAERS 2.0 Report Form. This new form replaced the now obsolete VAERS-1 Report Form, which was active from July 1, 1990 to June 29, 2017. Changes include: addition of new data elements, revisions to existing data elements, and elimination of some older data elements. See the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) web site for more information.

DISCLAIMER:  

VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to VAERS. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Most reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA's multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as "safety signals." If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.

Key considerations and limitations of VAERS data:

  • Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause.
  • Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.
  • The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.
  • VAERS data are limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available.
  • VAERS data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.
VAERS staff at CDC and the FDA follow up on all serious adverse event reports to obtain additional medical, laboratory, death certificates and/or autopsy records to help understand the circumstances. However, VAERS public data do not generally change based on the information obtained during the follow-up process.

There are limitations to VAERS data. A report to VAERS does not mean that the vaccine caused the adverse event, only that the adverse event occurred some time after vaccination. Read more about interpreting VAERS data at Additional Information: Data Limitations.

Incidence:   Reports of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Event characteristics include symptoms reported, vaccine type, name and manufacturer, number of days between vaccination and the adverse event, vaccination date, report date, whether the event was considered serious, how the event outcome was categorized, whether the patient recovered, and the patient's age group, sex and home state.

Population:   All persons reporting adverse event(s) after vaccination, reports received in June 1990 through last Friday. Reports are updated weekly and include reports processed through the preceding Friday.

Source:  Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Public Health Service (PHS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA)/ Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
In WONDER:  You can produce tables, maps, charts, and data extracts. Obtain frequency counts for event reports, and show the percentage of unique events. Display the Event Details reported for any single event, or the text from the Adverse Event Description, Lab Data, Current Illness, Adverse Events After Prior Vaccinations, Medications At Time Of Vaccination, and History / Allergies. Select specific event, vaccine and demographic criteria to produce cross-tabulated incidence measures. You can limit and index your data by any and all of these variables:

VAERS Data Items

    Person and Place
  1. Age
  2. Sex
  3. State / Territory
    Event Characteristics:
  4. Symptoms - classified with Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA)
  5. Event Category - describes the outcome of the event
  6. Recovered - indicates if the patient recovered
  7. Serious - indicates whether event was classified as serious
  8. Onset Interval - number of days after vaccine when symptoms occurred
  9. Days in Hospital - number of days hospitalized
  10. Vaccine Administered By - public, private, other, military, work, pharmacy, senior living, school, unknown agency
  11. Vaccine Purchased By - public, private, other, military, unknown agency
  12. Report Form Version - all, VAERS-1, VAERS 2.0
  13. VAERS ID - unique identification number for this event
  14. Mfr/Imm Proj Num - Manufacturer/Immunization Project Number, when applicable
    Vaccine Characteristics:
  15. Vaccine Products - vaccine type and name
  16. Manufacturers - makers of vaccine products
  17. Vaccine Dose - the number of vaccine doses given for a vaccine
  18. Vaccine Lot - the lot number for a vaccine product
    Text fields from the VAERS form:
  19. Adverse Event Description
  20. Lab Data
  21. Current Illness
  22. Adverse Events After Prior Vaccinations
  23. Medications At Time Of Vaccination
  24. History / Allergies
    Date Characteristics:
  25. Year and month vaccinated
  26. Year and month reported
  27. Year and month report was received
  28. Year and month of onset of adverse event
  29. Year and month of death

Please refer to the following topics:

VAERS Data Request
VAERS Event Details Report
Data Source Information
Additional Information



HEALTH EXPERT: “STOP COVID VAX EXPERIMENTS”


SCIENCE JUNKED AS COVID VACCINE ROLLOUT FALTERS



Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science

BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4425 (Published 13 November 2020)Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4425

Read our latest coverage of the coronavirus outbreak

Rapid Response:

Covid-19: Science, Conflicts and the Elephant in the Room

Dear Editor

Congratulations on your editorial highlighting the depressing levels of “corruption” taking place in the name of “beating the pandemic”. Scrutiny certainly deserves to be directed towards conflicts of interest within members of SAGE and scientific/medical advisors as examined by Dr Zoe Harcombe PhD, a Cambridge mathematics/economics graduate[1,2]. Aided by mainstream media and censorship by tech giants, this group controls the scientific narrative on which Government action has been based, even when the “science” relied upon is at complete odds with the views of many other world-class scientists.

Suppression of science and lack of open debate has impinged enormously on three issues of fundamental significance. Firstly, public fear of Covid has been elevated to levels that are completely out of proportion to the actual danger. A recent peer-reviewed paper by one of the world’s most cited and respected scientist, Professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University, quotes an infection fatality rate (IFR) for Covid of 0.00-0.57% (0.05% for under 70s), far lower than originally feared and no different to severe flu [3]. This paper is published on WHO’s own Bulletin but ignored by UK mainstream media.

Secondly, although deaths are currently running at normal levels, fear is being driven by inflation of Covid “cases” caused by inappropriate use of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test [4-7]. This test is hypersensitive and highly susceptible to contamination, particularly when not processed with utmost rigour by properly trained staff. Case inflation also occurs from use of excessive number of rounds of amplification cycles (termed CT) which amplifies non-infectious viral fragments and cross-reacting nucleotides from non-Covid coronaviruses/other respiratory viruses. These become mis-labelled as Covid. Even Dr Fauci confirms that a positive result using CT above 34 is invalid (Twitter thread, Jeff Nelson @vegsource 30 October 2020) but in the UK CTs may go up to 45, as confirmed by Professor Carl Heneghan of Oxford University’s Center for Evidence-Based Medicine: (House of Commons Science & Tech Committee, 17 Sep, 2020 YouTube.) An obvious improvement is to immediately halt any use of CTs above 34 and ensure that for CTs between 25 and 34, two consecutive positive results are required before confirming a case as Covid positive.

According to Professor Brookes, a Health Data Scientist from the University of Leicester, the UK’s official data shows no excess deaths due to respiratory infections this season (talkRadio, 'The number of people dying today is the same as it would be any other year', 17 November 2020 YouTube). Instead, excess total deaths have been driven by lack of treatment due to hospital closure/lockdowns and have occurred mostly at home. Whilst there is no question that the first wave of Covid, a then novel virus, was lethal to many, there is no sound evidence of any second wave.

The third and possibly the most consequential suppression of science relates to the narrative that people do not develop immunity following a Covid infection. We know that immunity to SARS-CoV-1 is very durable, persisting for at least 12-17 years [8-10]. Immunologists know that immunity to SARS-Cov-2 is no different. This is confirmed by many eminent scientists including Beda M Stadler, the former Director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern and Professor Emeritus (Ivor Cummins, Ep91 Emeritus Professor of Immunology...Reveals Crucial Viral Immunity Reality, 28 July 2020, YouTube), and Sucharit Bhakdi, former Chair of Medical Microbiology at the University of Mainz [11]. The human population has encountered and co-existed with myriad coronaviruses throughout evolution. Most of us therefore have cross-reacting T-cells, B cells and antibodies derived from encounters with cold coronaviruses that can recognise SARS-CoV-2 [12-14], in the same way that people “immunised” with cowpox became less susceptible to serious illness from smallpox - as Edward Jenner discovered in 1796. This is why we do not generally die from cold coronaviruses and precisely why so many of us were not susceptible to falling severely ill from Covid earlier this year. Even the chance of passing Covid to your spouse at the height of the pandemic was as low as 17%! [15 ].

In line with expectations, mediators of robust long-term immune memory, memory B and T-cells have both been firmly established to be produced following even a mild a Covid infection [17,18]. Pouncing on a handful of examples of apparent second Covid infections is irresponsible of the media but suits the false [18] narrative that falling antibody levels lead to loss of immunity. The evidence that immunity lasts is all around us - if this were not so we would see as many people dying of and falling seriously ill with Covid now as we did in March/April, including doctors and nurses.

Pfizer’s vaccination trial data provides further confirmation of the now low rates of prevalence. 94 participants were apparently infected based on PCR positive results (of unknown CT so we cannot be sure they are all genuinely Covid). The placebo group must comprise around 22,000, half the total trial number. This yields an infection rate of, at the very most, 0.4% and makes the chances of escaping infection greater than 99.6% during the trial period. The vaccine might well be 90% “effective” - although we are yet to learn exactly how this is measured - but the risk of contracting Covid in the first place is self-evidently low. The risk of both contracting and dying from Covid using an IFR of 0.57 (the worst case) was a mere 0.002% based on pessimistic assumptions. Of course, the elderly and other high-risk categories face greater risk, but it is still far less than it was early this year and it will continue to reduce as population immunity builds further.

Hijacking of science by vested interests has resulted in immeasurable harms to society. Lockdowns, meant to save lives but being pushed by narratives that have little basis in science, have themselves caused loss of life, livelihoods, dignity, and humanity. We need to ask how we have got to this sorry state. It seems that only the extrication of science from industry by introduction of independent sources of funding for scientific research institutions, perhaps by levying a brand-new tax on industry, will allow the nation’s best scientists an independent voice and put an end to the suppression of good science, together with the mistrust and conflict it generates.

References:
1. Dr Zoe Harcombe PhD. 9 November. SAGE conflicts of interest. https://www.zoeharcombe.com/2020/11/sage-conflicts-of-interest/
2. PM Hails “ herculean efforts” of life science companies to defeat coronavirus. 10 Downing Street Press Release. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-hails-herculean-effort-of-life-sci...
3. John P A Ioannidis Infection fatality rate of COVID-1937 inferred from seroprevalence data. Publication: Bulletin of the World Health Organization; Type: Research Article ID: BLT.20.265892 Page 1. 14 October 2020 https://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/BLT.20.265892.pdf
4. Elena Surkova, Vladyslav Nikolayevskyy, Francis Drobniewski. False positive Covid-19 results:hidden problems and costs. Lancet Respir Med 2020.September 29, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30453-7
5. Dr M Yeadon. Lies, damned lies and health statistics: the deadly danger of false positives. 20 September.
6. Dr Clare Craig FRC Path. How Covid Deaths Are Over-Counted. 27 October 2020. Updated 29 October 2020.
7. PCR positives: what do they mean? The Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, University of Oxford.23 September https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/pcr-positives-what-do-they-mean/
8. William J.Liuabc et al. T-cell immunity of SARS-CoV: Implications for vaccine development against MERS-CoV. Antiviral Research. Volume 137, January 2017, Pages 82-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.11.006
9. Le Bert N, Bertoletti A et al. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):457-462. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2550-z. Epub 2020 Jul 15. PMID: 32668444.
10. Guo, Z. Guo, C. Duan, Z. Chen, G. Wang, Y. Lu, M. Li, J. Lu. Long-Term Persistence of IgG Antibodies in SARS-CoV Infected Healthcare Workers. MedRxiv (2020) 2020.02.12.20021386 doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.12.20021386
11. Dr Karina Reiss, Dr Sucharit Bhakdi. Book, Corona False Alarm? Facts and Figures. Pages 101-108.
12. Peter Doshi. Covid-19: Do many people have pre-existing immunity? 17 September 2020 BMJ 2020; 370 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3563
13. E. King. Letter to BMJ: T-cells really are the superstars in fighting COVID-19 - but why are some of us so poor at making them? 21 Sep 2020 https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3563/rr-6
14. Kevin W NG et al. Preexisting and de novo humoral immunity to SARs-CoV-2 in humans. 6 Nov 2020 DOI: 10.1126/science.abe1107
15. Frederik Plesner Lyngse et al. COVID-19 Transmission Within Danish Households: A Nationwide Study from Lockdown to Reopening. medRxiv 2020.09.09.20191239; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.09.20191239
16. Phuong Nguyen-Contant et al. S Protein-Reactive IgG and Memory B Cell Production after Human SARS-CoV-2 Infection Includes Broad Reactivity to the S2 Subunit. mBio Sep 2020, 11 (5) e01991-20; DOI:10.1128/mBio.01991-20
17. Isabel Schulien et al, Characterization of pre-existing and induced SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells, Nature Medicine (2020). DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-01143-2
18. Tyler J Ripperger, Deepta Bhattacharya et al. Orthogonal SARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays Enable Surveillance of Low Prevalence Communities and Reveal Durable Humoral Immunity. Immunity Volume 53, Issue 5, 17 November 2020, Pages 925-933.e4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2020.10.004

Competing interests: No competing interests


Sucharit Bhakdi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Sucharit Bhakdi
BornNovember 1, 1946 (age 74)
Washington, D.C., U.S.
NationalityThai-German
Alma mater
Known forMicrobiology,[1] fringe ideas about COVID-19[2]
AwardsOrder of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate, Aronson Prize
Scientific career
FieldsMedicine/surgery, bacteriology and atherosclerosis

Sucharit Bhakdi (born Sucharit Punyaratabandhu, 1 November 1946, in Washington, D.C.) is a retired Thai-German microbiologist.[1] In 2020 Bhakdi became a prominent exponent of ideas about the coronavirus pandemic that ran counter to the scientific consensus.[2][disputed (for: See discussion on lead phrasing)  – discuss]

He was a professor at the University of Mainz, where from 1991 to 2012 he was head of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene.[3]

Early life and education

Bhakdi's parents are Thai diplomats.[4] In an interview, Bhakdi stated that his mother studied at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.[5]

Bhakdi studied at the Universities of Bonn, Gießen, Mainz and Copenhagen, and at the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics in Freiburg.[3]

He studied medicine at the University of Bonn from 1963 to 1970, during part of which (from 1966 to 1970) he was a scholarship holder of the German Academic Exchange Service.[6] Bhakdi worked for a while as a private assistant to the internal medicine specialist Walter Siegenthaler.[5] In February 1971 he received his doctorate in medicine. From 1972 to 1978, he studied at the Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology in Freiburg on scholarships from the Max Planck Society at the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology in Freiburg and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.[3]

He worked at the University of Copenhagen for a year before moving to the Institute of Medical Microbiology at the Justus Liebig University in Gießen, where he worked from 1977 to 1990. In July 1979 he habilitated.

Scientific and medical career

Bhakdi was appointed C2 professor at Gießen in 1982. He spent a further year in Copenhagen and became C3 professor of medical microbiology (at Gießen again) in 1987 before being appointed to the University of Mainz in 1990. From 1991 he headed the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene as a C4 professor.[3]

Bhakdi retired on 1 April 2012.[7] Since 2016 he has been a visiting scholar at the University of Kiel.[8][9][10]

Prior to his retirement, Bhakdi produced scientific work in fields such as bacteriology and atherosclerosis, and published multiple scientific articles in these areas.[11] Awards he received include the Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate.[12]

Memberships and functions

  • Member of the Collaborative Research Centres of the German Research Foundation "Proteins as Tools in Biology" at the University of Giessen (1987-1990),
  • Deputy Spokesperson of the Collaborative Research Center "Immunopathogenesis" (1990-1999)
  • Spokesperson of the Collaborative Research Center "490 Infection and Persistence in Infections" in Mainz (2000-2011).[6]
  • Co-founder and board member of the Association of Physicians and Scientists for Health, Freedom and Democracy, which was founded in May 2020 and lost its non-profit status in October 2020.[13] The purpose of the association is to take action against the government’s measures to contain the corona pandemic.[9]

In autumn 2020 he was one of the first signatories of the "appeal for free debating spaces" ( Appells für freie Debattenräume).[clarification needed][14]

He was Editor in Chief of Medical Microbiology and Immunology from 1990 to 2012.[15]

Prominence during COVID-19 pandemic

During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, Bhakdi started a YouTube channel proposing that the number of deaths stemming from SARS-CoV-2 infection had been overstated. In November 2020 his account was terminated for violating YouTube's community guidelines.[16]

He has been criticised for his theses on the COVID-19 pandemic; according to Medical Tribune [de], they are considered unscientific by a majority of experts.[17]

Bhakdi's criticisms of the COVID-19 pandemic response

His criticisms of states' (most particularly Germany's) reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic have included:

  • Writing an open Letter to German Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel regarding the "socio-economic consequences of the drastic containment measures which are currently being applied in large parts of Europe"[18]
  • Posting videos on YouTube[19] claiming, for example, that the Governement was overreacting because the virus posed no more threat than influenza, and that any COVID-19 vaccine would be "pointless".[20]
  • Participation in the writing of a "position paper of the BMI" by an employee of the German crisis management department.[21][22][23] The Federal Ministry distanced itself from the position, calling the paper a "private opinion" circulating on official letterhead, and released the chief government councilor Stephan Kohn from duty.[24]
  • He is the co-author of Corona, False Alarm? Facts and Figures (2020), German: ('Corona Fehlalarm?')[25][26] An earlier book of his was published in 2016, Schreckgespenst Infektionen – Mythen, Wahn und Wirklichkeit (tr. "Bogeyman Infections - Myths, Delusions and Reality").[27] He published both books together with his wife, Karina Reiss, a biologist and biochemist at the Quincke Research Center, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel.[28]

Responses to Bhakdi's criticisms

The German non-profit Correctiv fact-checked one of Bhakdi's YouTube videos, and found a number of problematic claims, including the claim that any COVID-19 vaccine would be "pointless", and that the virus posed no more threat than influenza.[20] Writing for Foreign Policy, Tyson Barker (Head of DGAP's Technology & Global Affairs Program)[29] described Bhakdi as a prominent example from a "crop of debunked but credentialed so-called experts minting conspiracy theories and undermining fact-based information".[30]

In October 2020 the University of Mainz issued a statement to the effect that it does not support Bhakdi's views.[31][32]

Awards

Professional awards

  • 1979 Preis der Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen[33]
  • 1980 Konstanzer Medizinischer Förderpreis[33]
  • 1987 Preis der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie[34]
  • 1988 Dr.-Friedrich-Sasse-Preis[33]
  • 1989 Ludwig-Schunk-Preis für Humanmedizin[33]
  • 1989 Robert-Koch-Förderpreis of Clausthal-Zellerfeld[35]
  • 1991 Gay-Lussac Humboldt Prize[36]
  • 2001 Aronson Prize for „wegweisende Arbeiten auf dem Gebiet des Komplementsystems und bakterieller Toxine“ tr. "pioneering work in the field of the complement system and bacterial toxins"[37][38]
  • 2005 H. W. Hauss Award[39]
  • 2005 Verdienstorden des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz[12]
  • 2009 Rudolf-Schönheimer Medal of the Deutschen Gesellschaft für Arterioskleroseforschung[40][41]

Negative award

Following the publicity accorded to Bhakdi's statements and publications regarding Covid-19 during 2020, the Gesellschaft zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung von Parawissenschaften (English: Society for the Scientific Investigation of Pseudosciences) named him as winner of the 2020 Goldenes Brett.[42]


Keep in mind how we used to think Roundup was totally safe!












https://thehighwire.com/unanswered-questions-as-fda-allows-pfizer-vaccine-rollout/

https://thehighwire.com/bayer-loses-california-roundup-weedkiller-appeal/

https://thehighwire.com/bayer-loses-california-roundup-weedkiller-appeal/

https://thehighwire.com/monsanto-ordered-to-pay-2-billion-to-cancer-victims/


at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)