Tuesday, January 26, 2021

How Chloroquine works: By raising the pH of your endosomes

  

i·on·o·phore
/īˈänəˌfôr/
noun
BIOCHEMISTRY
  1. a substance which is able to transport particular ions across a lipid membrane in a cell.
    "calcium ionophores"




https://www.researchgate.net/post/Chloroquine_effective_in_COVID-19_True_or_false

Discussion
Started 29th Mar, 2020

Chloroquine effective in COVID-19: True or false?

Chloroquine effective in COVID-19: True or false?
Dr. Prashant R. Wankhade
Hypothesis:
It has been proposed that these viruses are internalized by receptor mediated endocytosis and delivered to lysosomes. At acidic pH, the membrane surrounding the virus fuses with the membrane of lysosome, allowing the nucleic acid of virus to cross lysosomal membrane and enter the cytoplasm where the virus replicates. Infection of tissue culture cells by these viruses can be prevented by chloroquine, an agent that blocks function of lysosome. Chloroquine is a weak base that diffuses in lysosome and raises the pH of lysosome causing impairment of function of lysosomal enzymes. Viruses that requires acidic pH to fuse with cell membrane can no longer do so in the presence of chloroquine and the cells are protected from infection.
Facts:
1. Aim of the virus is to reach the destination where it can replicate. This destination is cytoplasm for RNA viruses and nucleus for DNA viruses.
2. Normally viruses enter the cell by direct membrane fusion or endocytosis-based mechanism.

en·do·cy·to·sis
/ˌendōsīˈtōsəs/
noun
BIOLOGY
  1. the taking in of matter by a living cell by invagination of its membrane to form a vacuole.

vac·u·ole
/ˈvakyo͞oˌōl/
noun
BIOLOGY
  1. a space or vesicle within the cytoplasm of a cell, enclosed by a membrane and typically containing fluid.
    • a small cavity or space in tissue, especially in nervous tissue as the result of disease.

  2. cy·to·plasm
    /ˈsīdəˌplazəm/
    noun
    BIOLOGY
    1. the material or protoplasm within a living cell, excluding the nucleus.

    pro·to·plasm
    /ˈprōdəˌplazəm/
    noun
    BIOLOGY
    1. the colorless material comprising the living part of a cell, including the cytoplasm, nucleus, and other organelles.


3. Exact mechanism of COVID-19 entry in cell isn’t clear (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92477/). If its entry is via membrane fusion then there is no need for COVID-19 to cross Lysosome as the virus particles will get direct entry in cytoplasm. Even if the entry is endocytosis-based then also it is less likely to cross Lysosome.
4. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are known to alter Lysosomal function. But there are discrepancies in the literature about whether or not chloroquine raises the lysosomal pH (Autophagy. 2018; 14(8): 1435–1455). Some studies do not support this fact whereas others state that the change in pH may not last longer than 1 to 4 hours. So, the fact that Chloroquine will cause alteration in viral cell cycle is not clear.
5. Viruses like polio virus and Hepatitis-C virus enters the cell via endocytosis; in that case Chloroquine would have helped in controlling these infections also, but no guidelines recommend its use.
6. This hypothesis related to Chloroquine and Viral infection is not new. One of the articles published in 2003 advocates its possible role in treatment of HIV infection but none of the guidelines has yet recommended (Lancet Infect Dis. 2003 Nov;3(11):722-7).
The same article advocates its possible role in clinical management of Corona related Middle East Respiratory syndrome (MERS) and Corona related severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) but no further data available on its definite role.
7. RNA viruses including COVID-19 can replicate in cytoplasm and need not require entry in the nucleus like DNA viruses. Chloroquine doesn’t have any effect on cytosolic pH to alter the replication of virus and in fact that will be hazardous for cell itself.
8. Thus, these facts put question mark on above hypothesis.
9. And finally, in this era of evidence-based medicine we need concrete evidence to support the hypothesis; as it’s not necessary for every hypothesis to reflect vis a vis in clinical applicability.
ResearchGate Logo

This discussion is featured on the COVID-19 research community page

View COVID-19 community

Most recent answer

25th May, 2020
George Cernigliaro
Steinigrimr Stefansson
Wouldn't the rate at which the cell death occurred be correlated to the level of chloroquine left in the sample? Is there a threshold chloroquine concentration below which cell death rate would be minimal? Point is, one can make that argument for any treatment where efficacy is observed, but harm is caused if the material is in excess. I'm not an hcq advocate so much as an informed person who has heard (and not from your French Quack) that hcq (not cq) has worked clinically when administered prophylacticly to patients at doses familiar to those clinicians treating patients for other maladies, such as Lupus and RA. These clinicians claim that hcq mitigates Covid-19 immune response such that intubations become unnecessary during treatment. I'm no expert by any means, but rather than belittle those who can't explain mechanistically why hcq might work, someone with your background should take on the challenge for why it might work for the reasons those clinicians actually observe. TEACH US.
1 Recommendation

Popular replies (1)

5th Apr, 2020
Christian G Meyer
Physician; independent researcher / consultant - infectious disease specialist - editor
No Evidence of Rapid Antiviral Clearance or Clinical Benefit with the Combination of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Infection
Jean Michel Molina et al.
PII: S0399-077X(20)30085-8
Reference: MEDMAL 4279
To appear in: Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses
Received Date: 28 March 2020
11 Recommendations

All replies (214)

30th Mar, 2020
Rituja Kaushal
LNMC & RC, Bhopal
True upto some extent..(until and unless anyone is epi genetically mutated)...
Below mentioned article includes molecular epidemiology aspect too.
It elucidates pre entry, entry and post translational modifications of viral proteins at host’s cellular level by the drug.
Also states about changes in immune responses.
Reference: An article titled “ New insights on the antiviral effects of chloroquine against Corona Virus: What to expect for COVID-19.” Published online on 12th March 2020 in International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents.
2 Recommendations
30th Mar, 2020
Subhash C. Juneja
College of William and Mary
True in part treatment, Trump did not say from his mind- he might have taken good advice from medical doctors. In India, some patients with this medicine along with other three/four medicine combination recovered earlier.
2 Recommendations
30th Mar, 2020
Tomas Koltai
Independent Researcher
It is not true nor false. The fact is that it has not been proved.
The problem is that in the middle of this crisis it is not easy to make a well planned clinical trial prospective randomised and with control subjects. It would take to long and the problem is that every day 3,000 patients die.
As there is no other treatment available we are forced to use it.
However a more integral therapy would be required like:
1. Tocilizumab to antagonise the cytokine storm.
2. Nelfinavir to inhibit proteases required for cell entry and inhibition of SREBP 1c because the virus needs lipid synthesis for its reproduction.
3. Doxicyclin that reduces translation at ribosomal level.
4. Chloroquine for the reasons you very well explained in your question.
This four drug therapy may work on a theoretical basis.
1 Recommendation
30th Mar, 2020
Prashant Wankhade
Thanks for inputs.
Actually everyone has been intimidated by the virus impact. Most of the time we give placebos to patient but this time medical professionals themselves are consuming the placebo.
When we don't have any definite measures, we try everything hoping it will work but hard facts can't be denied.
Chloroquine is one form of hope, though it hasn't made any impact on clinical outcome, it might have caused some reduction in panick.
1 Recommendation
30th Mar, 2020
Tomas Koltai
Independent Researcher
Try to add high doses of doxicyclin
I do not think it can do any harm and it will prevent bacterial over infection. At the same time you would be inhibiting translation of viral RNA. Good luck.
1 Recommendation
31st Mar, 2020
Rituja Kaushal
LNMC & RC, Bhopal
A very recent controlled clinical study conducted by French researchers on 80 Corona positive patients revealed a very successful outcome ( recovery just in 6 days) by giving Hydroxychloroquin +Azithromycin+Zinc sulphate regimen....
Now it is on the way of getting established as currently available therapeutic cure for COVID-19.
2 Recommendations
31st Mar, 2020
Tomas Koltai
Independent Researcher
The only study I know made in France included ten patients.
Please can you include the references.
Thank you.
1 Recommendation
31st Mar, 2020
Rituja Kaushal
LNMC & RC, Bhopal
Dr. Didiair Raoult work on 80 patients and again one more study on 699 patients by Dr. Zelenko....
1 Recommendation
31st Mar, 2020
Christian G Meyer
Physician; independent researcher / consultant - infectious disease specialist - editor
It is currently being tested in large clinical trials.
4 Recommendations
31st Mar, 2020
Tomas Koltai
Independent Researcher
That means that there are no published results yet.
1 Recommendation
31st Mar, 2020
Tomas Koltai
Independent Researcher
Ruxolitinil has been mentioned as the miracle drug to treat interstitial pneumonitis produced by COVID 19. It was successful in 8 patients in ICU in Italy. However, this is only a newspaper article. It needs further testing.
1 Recommendation
1st Apr, 2020
Kenneth Bentum Otabil
University of Energy and Natural Resources
I agree with Tomas Koltai that it is not a question of true or false. It is a matter of not having enough evidence to show whether it works or not. That notwithstanding, in this particular situation where we have no proven effective treatment, it might be worth administering chloroquine in COVID-19 especially for patients in very critical conditions, as the alternative to not giving the drug could be worse.
Doxycycline is known to be very potent even in atypical infections and hence could be useful in combination with chloroquine. However, it is also important to check for the effects of this combination to know if the combination is synergistic.
1 Recommendation
2nd Apr, 2020
Rajkumar Rajendram
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences
2nd Apr, 2020
Rajkumar Rajendram
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences
This review discusses the points I outline below.
Several medications that have been recommended for the treatment of Covid-19 are associated with prolongation of the QTc interval and therefore torsade de pointes and sudden cardiac death.
The evidence of the potential benefit of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of Covid-19 is increasing.
Other medications which may be used in this cohort include the macrolide antibiotics (e.g. azithromycin). These can also prolong the QTc interval. Administering several medications that may prolong the QT interval is associated with a high risk of complications.
In medicine risks and benefits must be balanced. Safety netting is important whenever there is a great potential benefit but also a very significant risk. In that context QTc intervals, renal and liver function must be monitored closely in patients treated with chloroquine and or macrolides. They should probably not be started if the baseline QTc is more than 450 ms. It should probably be stopped if the QTc increases 25% above baseline. It should definitely be stopped if QTc is above 500 ms. This is an evolving situation and recommendations may change as the potential risks and benefits become clearer.
Beta-blockade is used in the treatment of congenital and acquired long QT syndrome, so may be beneficial in this setting.
2 Recommendations
5th Apr, 2020
Arvind Singh
Banaras Hindu University
5th Apr, 2020
Jules SADEFO KAMDEM
Université de Montpellier
Yes !
1 Recommendation
5th Apr, 2020
Christian G Meyer
Physician; independent researcher / consultant - infectious disease specialist - editor
No Evidence of Rapid Antiviral Clearance or Clinical Benefit with the Combination of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Infection
Jean Michel Molina et al.
PII: S0399-077X(20)30085-8
Reference: MEDMAL 4279
To appear in: Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses
Received Date: 28 March 2020
11 Recommendations
5th Apr, 2020
Jules SADEFO KAMDEM
Université de Montpellier
Yes because there is not another solution !
3 Recommendations
7th Apr, 2020
Salim Hassan
Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University
I am not sure
2 Recommendations
10th Apr, 2020
Antonella Marcoccia
Azienda Ospedaliera Sandro Pertini Roma
Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine share the same mechanism of action but hydroxychloroquine has more tolerable safety profile that makes it the preferred drug to treat malaria and autoimmune conditions.
The recent data, presented as the first results obtained from clinical studies ongoing in several Chinese Hospitals, show that the chloroquine treatment, compared to control group treatments, can reduce the length of hospital stay and decrease the evolution of COVID-19 pneumonia. This has led China to include Chloroquine in the recommendations regarding the prevention and treatment of COVID -19 Pneumonia (1). A recent paper, supported the in vitro antiviral activity of Hydroxychloroquine and its more potent effect to inhibit SARS-COV-2, if compared to chloroquine.(2) The drug can contrast the fusion of the virus with the cell membrane. It can also inhibit nucleic acid replication , glycosylation of viral proteins , viral assembly , new virus particle transport , virus release . (2,3). Furthermore, the immunomodulatory effects of hydroxychloroquine may be useful in preventing the cytokine storm that occurs in critically ill SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (4)
At the moment in Italy, especially in the nothern regions, political and health authorities are making incredible efforts to contain the spread of COVID -19 . In this setting, the Hydrossichloroquine results an ideal drug to fight the epidemia, for its antiviral and immunomodulatory effects combined with its tolerable safety profile and very low cost .
Hydrossichloroquine would appear to have a crucial role in the early treatment of covid 19 patients.5-6 .
References
1. Gao J, Tian Z, Yang X. Breakthrough: Chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated
pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci Trends. 2020;14(1):72–73. doi:10.5582/bst.2020.01047
2. Yao X, Ye F, Zhang M, Miao Z et al. In Vitro Antiviral Activity and Projection of Optimized Dosing Design of Hydroxychloroquine for the
Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 9]. Clin Infect
Dis. 2020;ciaa237
3. Savarino A, Boelaert JR, Cassone A, Majori G, Cauda R. Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today's diseases?.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3(11):722–727. doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00806-5
4. Savarino A, Shytaj IL. Chloroquine and beyond: exploring anti-rheumatic drugs to reduce immune hyperactivation in HIV/AIDS.
Retrovirology. 2015;12:51. Published 2015 Jun 18. doi:10.1186/s12977-015-0178-0
5. Colson P, Rolain JM, Lagier JC, Brouqui P, Raoult D. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as available weapons to fight COVID-19
[published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 4]. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;105932. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105932
6.Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 20]. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;105949. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949
2 Recommendations
16th Apr, 2020
Sunny Chi Lik Au
Tung Wah Eastern Hospital
NIH clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine, a potential therapy for COVID-19, begins. NIH News. 2020 Apr 9.
1 Recommendation
17th Apr, 2020
Sunny Chi Lik Au
Tung Wah Eastern Hospital
No evidence of clinical efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 infection and requiring oxygen: results of a study using routinely collected data to emulate a target trial. medRxiv. 2020 Apr
3 Recommendations
17th Apr, 2020
Tomas Koltai
Independent Researcher
May be it would be time to test Astemizol or itraconazol to accelerate viral clearance.
1 Recommendation
17th Apr, 2020
Francesco Saverio Dioguardi
Università degli studi di Cagliari
If chloroquine works, and I believe it does not and is also often deadly due to cardiotoxicity, why are we all looking for some different and effective therapies? On the contrary, EIDD-2801 seems a serious answer. Please look at:
T. P. Sheahan et al., Sci. Transl. Med.10.1126/scitranslmed.abb5883 (2020).
I trust on them.
3 Recommendations
18th Apr, 2020
Antonella Marcoccia
Azienda Ospedaliera Sandro Pertini Roma
No Hydroxychloroquine Benefit in Small, Randomized COVID-19 Trial
Here you are a preprint Paper that has not been peer reviewed. 
the dosage is very high and gastroenteric intolerance was absolutely predictable for those who know the drug for clinical use in rheumatology.
Efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: results of a randomized clinical trial
medRxiv 2020.03.22.20040758; doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758
Here you can read another preprint paper not peer reviewed that use low dosage without side effects with completely opposite results .
Because of confounding, the trials are unable to answer convincingly the question of whether HCQ can benefit COVID-19 patients"
I think it is better to wait The largest phase 3 placebo-controlled trial with anticipated enrollment of 1300 participants conducted by researchers at the University Hospital, Angers, France.
2 Recommendations
20th Apr, 2020
Suraj Mali
Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai
24th Apr, 2020
Avinash Aujayeb
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
It is far too early to know. The Recovery trial, which is a UK based RCT ,might have answers in the next few months.
2 Recommendations
24th Apr, 2020
Ijaz Durrani
Dear Dr Wankhade: The short answer is ' False' . The much trumpeted drug Remedisivir failed the first trial test and hydrochloroquine a mellowed down version of the anti malarial 100 + years old drug ' Chloroquin' was being used in combination with 'R' leading to severe side effects like arrhythmia and cardiac arrest: Ref: https://www.ft.com/content/0a4872d1-4cac-4040-846f-ce32daa09d99
Regards--
2 Recommendations
24th Apr, 2020
Rasha Shakir Nima
University Of Kufa
There are no certinity that chloroquin is agood treatment for cornavirus
2 Recommendations
24th Apr, 2020
Muhammad Yousuf
King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS)
Until larger randomized controlled trials including WHO SOLIDARITY trial are available the role of Chloroquine or Hydroxychloroquine in the management of COVID-19 infection is still not definitely clear.
3 Recommendations
25th Apr, 2020
Rajkumar Rajendram
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences
It is important that chloroquine is not confused with chlorine. Chlorine is commonly found in disinfectants. Ingestion of chloroquine may be helpful.
It has also been suggested that ingestion of disinfectants may be beneficial to treat patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. DO NOT DO THIS. IT IS HARMFUL TO HUMAN HEALTH.
The above article may be of interest and provide some light relief.
2 Recommendations
26th Apr, 2020
Md Rabiul Alam
Evercare Hospital Dhaka
Indian gift of 0.1 million HCQ tab is already received in Bangladesh today. It is also sending this (HCQ) to 55 COVID-19 hit countries. Ref: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/india-sending-hydroxychloroquine-to-55-coronavirus-hit-countries/articleshow/75186938.cms?from=mdr
4 Recommendations
28th Apr, 2020
Yahy Mohamed
Sana'a University
According to a study was done ,Yes may be used. This study accepted to be published soon.
2 Recommendations
1st May, 2020
Abbas Rahdar
University of Zabol
No one knows the truth, nor will researchers know they are afraid of getting it, until they do serious autopsies and experiment with medications. It has been too long and all of the government and researchers are turning a blind eye.
2 Recommendations
3rd May, 2020
Salvatore Vicidomini
Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca
Dear Dr. have a nice Sunday.
In my RG open question about the dramatic situation of Lombardia (N.Italy)
I propose the test of the natural compounds from Artemisia, according to previous extensive bibliographical reviews about toxic effect in potential biocontrol.
I hope this is useful.
______________________________________
|n.2|....The following 12 virus species have been recognized, both DNA-virus and RNAvirus, both phyto-virus and zoo-virus: BVDV bovine viral diarrhea virus; COPV, canine papilloma virus; DEN/2, dengue virus 1; FIV, feline immunodeficiency virus; HBV, human hepatitis B virus; HCMV, human cito-megalo virus; HFLUV, human influentia virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HSV/1, human herpes virus 1; HSV/2, human herpes virus 2; JUNV, junin virus; TMV, tobacco mosaic virus. ....
.. ... FROM Artemisia: absinthium, afra, annua, anomala, arborescens, capillaris, caruifolia, douglassiana, herbaalba,verlotorum, vulgaris.....
.. ... Natural compounds: aesculetina, arcapillina, artemisinina, artesunate, beta-arteannuina, beta-sitosterolo, deidro-artemisinina, deossi-artemisinina, isorhamnetina, N-N-N-3p-coumaroil-spermidina, stigmasterolo.
2 Recommendations
5th May, 2020
Pieter Borger
W & W Research
In fact, SARS-CoV2 (COViD19) and SARSCoV are one of the same kind. Low doses of chloroquine should be beneficial. In both viruses.
2 Recommendations
6th May, 2020
Joseph Enya
University of Ilorin
true
2 Recommendations
7th May, 2020
Yahy Mohamed
Sana'a University
Dear researcher
You can download this article to know if chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine can be used or not in treatment of COVID19.
2 Recommendations
9th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
The only people that will benefit from this hydroxychloroquine hoopla are malpractice lawyers that will go after doctors, elected officials and pundits that are pushing this snakeoil remedy.
1 Recommendation
9th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Touting hydroxychloroquine as a virus cure is a fringe belief. It has no basis in reality. I have been on RG for a long time and this nonsense is horrifying.
This sort of pseudo-science has to be confronted especially now when so many lives are at stake.
2 Recommendations
9th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
People often ask me why I bother to confront and ridicule fake scientists on RG.
The answer is simple. I worked long and hard to gain the respect of my peers. I am not alone. There are thousands of us that strive to make a living using the scientific method to enrich the human experience.
Fake scientists spouting their nonsense on RG is not only a slap in my face, but also a slap in the face of all real scientists worldwide.
1 Recommendation
9th May, 2020
Christian G Meyer
Physician; independent researcher / consultant - infectious disease specialist - editor
Let us wait for the results of sound clinical studies which are currently being done. A compilation can be seen at ClinicalTrials.gov. There are several modes of how CQ and HCQ might act, which I can explain.
5 Recommendations
9th May, 2020
Ahmed Hamdan Lafta
University of Baghdad
Dr. Prashant Wankhade… thanks for this important question.
1 Recommendation
9th May, 2020
Ahmed Hamdan Lafta
University of Baghdad
hi sir
i think... true
1 Recommendation
9th May, 2020
Ahmed Hamdan Lafta
University of Baghdad
I agree with Dr. Christian G Meyer comments.
1 Recommendation
9th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Christian G Meyer . Please explain how disrupting the H+ gradient of all cell organelles including mitochondria can inhibit virus endocytosis and translocation of the viral genome.
1 Recommendation
9th May, 2020
Christian G Meyer
Physician; independent researcher / consultant - infectious disease specialist - editor
9th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
HCQ inhibits cellular metabolism.
Inhibiting cellular metabolism kills cells.
This is really simple cell biology.
Please stop promoting this HCQ nonsense "cure"
1 Recommendation
9th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Christian G Meyer . Please tell me again how shutting down all cell metabolism using HCQ protects against viral endocytosis while maintaining normal cell functions.
I missed your first response.
1 Recommendation
9th May, 2020
Christian G Meyer
Physician; independent researcher / consultant - infectious disease specialist - editor
Am not promoting HCQ at all, but I prefer to see the results of the clinical trials. By the way, CQ has been taken for decades as an antimalarial and a prophylactic drug and currently is applied in several other, mostly autoimmune, conditions. Maybe you wish to look at the safety profile of CQ and HCQ, e.g. at CDC websites.
7 Recommendations
9th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Your words:
"There are several modes of how CQ and HCQ might act, which I can explain."
Please explain.
9th May, 2020
Christian G Meyer
Physician; independent researcher / consultant - infectious disease specialist - editor
Again, I do not promote CQ/HCQ as as safe cure, but everything should be studied in detail in CTs, including Remdesivir, Tocilizumab and other (experimental) drugs, e.g. AT-100, APNO, TZLS-50, Leronlimab, OYA1, BPI-002, Brilacidin, NP-12, BST-25 and other substances.
6 Recommendations
9th May, 2020
Thaer Dawood Salman
University of Baghdad
Interesting question that provoked several useful information.
1 Recommendation
9th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Christian G Meyer . Lets try this again and please don't copy/paste nuggets that have nothing to do with the issue at hand.
You do know some cell biology, right?
Neither HCQ nor CQ have anything to do with receptor mediated endocytosis through clathrin coated pits, phagocytosis and pinocytosis through capping, lipid rafts, processes that are ATP/CTP dependent, proton pumps, ion channels, PS-modified membrane proteins, etc, etc
Again, your words:
"There are several modes of how CQ and HCQ might act, which I can explain."
You don't know jack.
2 Recommendations
9th May, 2020
Christian G Meyer
Physician; independent researcher / consultant - infectious disease specialist - editor
I stop this discussion due to the obvious medical and pharmacological incompetence of the responder (SS).
6 Recommendations
9th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
I'm sorry that you can't publish in a peer-reviewed journal.
2 Recommendations
9th May, 2020
Christian G Meyer
Physician; independent researcher / consultant - infectious disease specialist - editor
@Steingrimur Stefansson: Have published two papers on COVID-19 in peer reviewed journals. I don't want to be personal, but your rude, unpolite and unpleasant style urges me to state: If you think I can´t publish in a peer reviewed journal, please just compare our h-indexes and citations, if you wish so. Ok?
7 Recommendations
9th May, 2020
Christian G Meyer
Physician; independent researcher / consultant - infectious disease specialist - editor
We know now that lockdown and other measures have severe effects on mental health.
7 Recommendations
11th May, 2020
Vivica Grotelueschen
Universität zu Lübeck
I just read a few of your recent comments and the more I read the more I wondered about your rude wording.
I totally agree with you that not everything that is presented as "science" here and even in papers is good science in terms of study/experimental design, controls or interpretation of results.
From my point of view it's probably an outcome of the "publish-or-perish" principle and competing groups working against each other on the same field (being the first to publish becomes more important than having the better results) both leading to quantity over quality which is further pushed by the economical interest of some editors.
We all started on a low level once; critical reading of information is definitely not easy especially if something fits into your own theory. Unproven theories served as information tend to become fact-like in your head if they are just repeated often enough – the basic principle of (willingly) creating fake news.
Therefore it is absolutely okay to scrutinize statements made in a discussion and to show how "good science" should be done. This is what the purpose of research gate is to me: Fact-based discussion on the Pros and Cons helping others to improve their knowledge and their scientific skills. Unproven ideas may also be mentioned as long as they are not taken as facts but as a baseline for discussion. Research is done to gather new information and often by setting up a theory and trying to prove it by trial and error experiments. This can be even crude ideas. If your theory is that "somewhere in the arctic lives a green elephant" you are free in spending your live trying to find it and discuss the hypothetical existence with others as long as you don’t take a gray elephant from africa, paint it green, ship it into the arctic and present a picture of it as a proof for your publication titled “The existence of green elephants in the artic region”.
Pointing out missing/wrong facts in a discussion is a good thing generally and providing facts about elephants might show the nonsense of such a project before starting it.
But at least in my eyes your personally insulting comments against others and their ideas here mainly discredit you and not them. What I read between the lines is: “I’m loud, therefore I’m right”. Not a very scientific justification which makes me doubt that your posts on the topics are much better…
5 Recommendations
11th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Vivica Grotelueschen . Full disclosure: I am old and mean tempered, but if you go through my answers to real scientific questions here on RG you will find most of my answers quite civil.
Pseudosciences like homeopathy, creationism and now miraculous COVID19 cures are questions that do not deserve to be discussed scientifically and rationally because their premise is rooted in superstitions, ignorance and disinformation gleaned from social media.
4 Recommendations
12th May, 2020
Fouad Yousuf
Alfaisal University
LATEST UPDATES ON THIS TOPIC:
Hydroxychloroquine alone or with Azithromycin for COVID-19: No benefit but increased risk
No significant benefit with Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin either alone or in combination on in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients in USA. However, increased risk of prolonged QT-interval with risk of ventricular arrhythmias.
References
Association of Treatment With Hydroxychloroquine or Azithromycin With In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 in New York State
Observational Study of Hydroxychloroquine in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19
Risk of QT Interval Prolongation Associated With Use of Hydroxychloroquine With or Without Concomitant Azithromycin Among Hospitalized Patients Testing
Positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).
5 Recommendations
12th May, 2020
Antonella Marcoccia
Azienda Ospedaliera Sandro Pertini Roma
I prefer to wait the results of the many randomized controlled clinical trials that are ongoing .
I don’t understand what is the rational for using very hight dosage of hydroxichororquine in the TRIAL RECOVERY
Hydroxychloroquineby mouth for a total of 10 days as follows
Initial dose 800 mg
6 hours after initial dose 800 mg
12 hours after initial dose 400 mg
24 hours after initial dose 400 mg
Every 12 hours thereafter for 9 days 400 mg
The same hight dosage is applied in SOLIDARITY (the WHO megatrial)
Toxic-pharmacological data and the clinical activity of chloroquine, given its worldwide use, are unquestionably acquired; chloroquine is reported on all official texts and is therefore to be considered a well-established drug.
Acute chloroquine intoxication (after high overdoses of 2-5 g) can cause death within 1-3 hours as a result of cardiocirculatory and respiratory arrest. ( the RECOVERY dosage of 1600 mg is very close to 2 grams)
Despite I use this drug every day and I'm sure that has a good safety profile and a good rational for using aganist SARS COV 2 , I would be afraid to recruit patients for these two studies.
4 Recommendations
12th May, 2020
Salim Hassan
Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University
I am not sure with thanks
4 Recommendations
12th May, 2020
Isam Alkhalifawi
University of Baghdad
Efficacy of Chloroquine in treatment of COVID-19 is still underway
By Abeen Shayiq
2 Recommendations
12th May, 2020
A. Kettab
Université de Bouira
Les résultats obtenus avec la chloroquine sont très intéressants.
3 Recommendations
13th May, 2020
A. Kettab
Université de Bouira
La chloroquine, le confinement sont en train de donner de meilleurs résultats
3 Recommendations
13th May, 2020
A. Kettab
Université de Bouira
Chloroquine, containment are working better
2 Recommendations
14th May, 2020
Talha Bin Emran
Kanazawa University
Please go through the attached published article.
Thank you.
3 Recommendations
14th May, 2020
A. Kettab
Université de Bouira
La chloroquine est très efficace, a défaut de vaccin.
4 Recommendations
14th May, 2020
A. Kettab
Université de Bouira
Thank you Dear Salim Hassen.
Chloroquine is very effective, a vaccine defect
4 Recommendations
14th May, 2020
Ragad moufaq Tawafak
Al Buraimi University College
I agree.
3 Recommendations
14th May, 2020
A. Kettab
Université de Bouira
@Talha
Je pense bientôt un vaccin ?
2 Recommendations
14th May, 2020
A. Kettab
Université de Bouira
@Dear All. I am soon thinking of a vaccine.
2 Recommendations
14th May, 2020
A. Kettab
Université de Bouira
@Dear Ragad
Thank you
2 Recommendations
15th May, 2020
Salim Hassan
Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University
Follow
2 Recommendations
15th May, 2020
Muhammad Yousuf
King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS)
Studies to date on the role of Hydroxychloroquine alone or in combination with azithromycin in the management of COVID-19 are negative (1-2), but with increased risk of harm (3)
References
1.Association of Treatment With Hydroxychloroquine or Azithromycin With In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 in New York Statehttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2766117
2. Observational Study of Hydroxychloroquine in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19
3. Risk of QT Interval Prolongation Associated With Use of Hydroxychloroquine With or Without Concomitant Azithromycin Among Hospitalized Patients Testing Positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).
3 Recommendations
15th May, 2020
A. Kettab
Université de Bouira
Thank you Dear Muhammad for informations.
2 Recommendations
15th May, 2020
A. Kettab
Université de Bouira
Thank Dear Salim Hassan
1 Recommendation
16th May, 2020
Fouad Yousuf
Alfaisal University
Should we consider Hydroxychloroquine a dead horse for treatment of COVID-19?
Added to previous studies of lack of benefit, but increased risk as mentioned by
Muhammad Yousuf , a recent study on mortality of COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquiene with or without Azithromycin did not any benefit,
but increased mortality (2).
3 Recommendations
16th May, 2020
A. Kettab
Université de Bouira
Dear All
according to the work of researchers, it is effective. it is applied in France, Algeria,.... she gives good respect.
3 Recommendations
19th May, 2020
Alan Victer
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
I agree
3 Recommendations
23rd May, 2020
Juan Antonio Aguilera
University of Texas at El Paso
FALSE.
The Lancet just published results in over 96 000 patients: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext
It actually led to a decrease in survival rates.
1 Recommendation
23rd May, 2020
Antonella Marcoccia
Azienda Ospedaliera Sandro Pertini Roma
Several limitations and too much confounding factors due to observational study design. I prefer to wait the results of many randomized clinical trials that are going on .
I have many doubts about high dosages that have been chosen in Recovery trial and Solidarity megatrial .
1 Recommendation
23rd May, 2020
George Cernigliaro
Can't speak to chloroquine, but hydroxychloroquine (hcq) has been used in much higher than 200mg/day in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Lupus for many decades, under phyician care, without the side effects of concern, for a vast majority of patients. In addition, hcq has been used successfully by many clinicians in the US and Europe in Covid-19 treatment, especially as prophylaxis and early-stage treatment, again without side effects in the vast majority of patients under MD care. Most of the retrospective studies could not have been conducted in a way allowing partitioning of co-morbidities which influenced ultimate outcome. That, and the unfortunate politicization here in the US, has confounded any real attempts at discerning hcq efficacy. I am no expert in this field, but as a scientist, the variables discussed here make accessible a rational discussion. That said, the clinicians are the most reliable barometers.
2 Recommendations
23rd May, 2020
Antonella Marcoccia
Azienda Ospedaliera Sandro Pertini Roma
I agree with you . HCQ is an ideal drug available for using in a large population , it has a rationale of efficacy, side effects already known because already employed for other indications in rheumatology, easy to do and low cost. Too much to put it all together ... The interesting role of hydroxychloroquine seems to be not the antiviral activity but the immunomodulation in a early stage of covid 19. On march 17th AIFA approved the off label use of hydroxychloroquine for covid 19 in italy and many general practitioners started to use this drug for treatment of not severe ill covid patients at home . The hospitalizations decreased and especially acute ill patients admitted in critical unit decreased. Now we are waiting for the results of currently randomized controlled large-scale trials.
WHAT'S THE PROBLEM?
I don’t understand what is the rational for using very hight dosage of hydroxichororquine in the TRIAL RECOVERY
Hydroxychloroquine by mouth for a total of 10 days as follows
Initial dose 800 mg 
6 hours after initial dose 800 mg  (1600 mg in 12 h ????)
12 hours after initial dose 400 mg 
24 hours after initial dose 400 mg 
Every 12 hours thereafter for 9 days 400 mg (800 mg for 9 days)
The same hight dosage is applied in SOLIDARITY the megatrial of WHO
Toxic-pharmacological data and the clinical activity of chloroquine, given its worldwide use, are unquestionably acquired; chloroquine is reported on all official texts and is therefore to be considered a well-established drug.
Acute chloroquine intoxication (after high overdoses of 2-5 g) can cause death within 1-3 hours as a result of cardiocirculatory and respiratory arrest. ( the RECOVERY dosage of 1600 mg is very close to 2 grams)
Despite I use this drug every day and I'm sure that has a good safety profile and a good ration for using aganist SARS COV 2 , I would be afraid to recruit patients for these two studies. 
Moreover, this high dosage could not be used on a large population . So what is the goal of these trials ?
1 Recommendation
23rd May, 2020
George Cernigliaro
In the USA, use of this material has been politicized to the point of absurdity. As I understand, off-label use of many other prescribed medicines is pretty much a standard practice, and reserved to Doctor-Patient decision. Such a shame and a discredit to the effort.
3 Recommendations
23rd May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Umm...Do you know about how HCQ works on the cellular level?
Do you know that HCQ is a lysosomal and mitochondrial pH gradient disruptor?
Do you know what happens when all cellular metabolism is inhibited by pH disruptors such as chloroquine?
There is no magical cure-all for a pandemic viral infection.
3 Recommendations
23rd May, 2020
Antonella Marcoccia
Azienda Ospedaliera Sandro Pertini Roma
In the course of pandemic, on my opinion it is unethical to wait the set up of clinical trial that started only in the last month. People died in a short time and intensive care units were full. Many doctors and nurses died too. In this setting a drug available for using in a large population with a rationale of efficacy, side effects already known because already employed for other indications in rheumatology, has been used as off label at the same dosage used in rheumatological clinical practice. In this setting the italian government approved the off label use of hydroxychloroquine for early stage of covid 19 . In the last month the hospitalizations decreased and especially acute ill patients admitted in critical unit decreased. Now we can wait for the results of currently randomized controlled large-scale studies of several drugs (including hydroxychloroquine) for fighting the outbreak all over the world and the next possible recurrence in autumn. The problem is that " the best" clinical trials have chosen toxic dosages of HCQ with a very difficult recruitment of patients and high risk of discontinuation for side effects and increased mortality .
Picot S, Marty A, Bienvenu AL, et al. Coalition: Advocacy for prospective clinical trials to test the post-exposure potential of hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19 [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 4]. One Health. 2020;100131. doi:10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100131
23rd May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Yes ….Absolutely.....Everybody has to ingest ionophores and Zn++ to ward off the virus because somebody related to somebody who knows a person who lives next door to a quack in France who says that HCQ cures everything COVID19 related. /s
Don't bother with these pesky clinical trials that show whether a drug works or not. Pfffftttt. Clinical trials have only been able to prove whether a drug works in the general population or not for the last ~100 years.
Yes.... I know......boring facts...Who needs modern medicine when you can go by with your opinion /s.
1 Recommendation
23rd May, 2020
George Cernigliaro
No one is suggesting that clinical trials are irrelevant. However, compassionate use of off-label medicines during emergency treatments are, at this point, the ONLY solutions for beseiged clinicians working with what they have. So, modern medicine, with exception of off-the-shelf medicines in the tool box, has done little to help thus far, which is not a criticism of modern medicine, as this virus hit quickly. For hcq, clinicians have not suggested it was a cure, so much as a preventive of over-response by the immune system, which has kept patients from intubation, which for clinicians, is a success in "flattening the curve". And, by the way, clinical trials are not the be-all and end-all, as there are some highly advertised drugs on the market now, which are currently being litigated for longer-term side-effects not seen or anticipated in those same clinical trials. Unfortunately, nothing is certain. As an aside, we should consider ourselves fortunate that there are possible medical tools in the toolbox which allow for compassionate off-label use. Since when is it absolutely necessary that for every new medical challenge, we need new medicines? Having these tools at hand while a vaccine is attempted is a real gift. And, at this time, the only reliable markers for whether medical efficacy is seen for any drugs tried, come from clinicians actually faced with the day-to-day reality of Covid-19 in the ER.
1 Recommendation
23rd May, 2020
Aqeel yousif Alshukri
University Of Kufa
I agree with you . HCQ is the only drug that can be used to treat covid-19 patients.
2 Recommendations
24th May, 2020
Dominique Liger
Université Paris-Sud 11
Hi there,
Obviously there is no clear beneficial effect of chloroquine derivatives on Covid-19... https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext
3 Recommendations
24th May, 2020
Antonella Marcoccia
Azienda Ospedaliera Sandro Pertini Roma
Dear Prof Steingrimur Stefansson ,
I perfectly agree with you about the importance of randomized controlled clinical trials . The gold standard ... but It could take months to correctly design a randomized controlled trial ...
During a outbreak clinicians could decide to use the previous evidence ... drugs in use with in vitro evidence of efficacy while people die day by day . In this setting I used the expression "on my opinion " and not against randomized clinical trials...
Nobody claims to use the results of off-label use and compassionate use of drugs as an evidence ... If the patient died, it's assumed he or she died of the disease, but if the patient survived, it's assumed he or she survived because of the given drug, but this is not true ...without a control group, we can never, ever safely find new medications for any disease.
For this reason people all over th world are waiting the results of clinical trials ...
As for your previous question about my knowledge of the mechanisms of cellular action of hydroxychlorokine, I know what I read in the scientific literature.
Yao X, Ye F, Zhang M, et al. In Vitro Antiviral Activity and Projection of Optimized Dosing Design of Hydroxychloroquine for the Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 9]. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;ciaa237.
If you have other evidence , any other evidence against the rational for the use of HCQ even in clinical trials it is very important to share it with us .
At the moment I believe that Everyone claims to improve knowledge in order to correctly interpret the results of ongoing clinical trials that will be completed in the coming months
2 Recommendations
24th May, 2020
George Cernigliaro
Ms. Liger: Thanks for the Lancet article. It is clear from this study that BMI, independent of other factors, also contributed to poor Covid outcomes. Given that recorded clinical dosing was not controlled, is it possible that the "killing" dose of cq and hcq was, in fact, more responsible for increased deaths among the high BMI cohorts? I think Dr. Marcoccia mentioned that earlier in this discussion. Are there studies where dosing was included as a variable? I know that the Mayo Clinic in the USA is conducting such a study now.
3 Recommendations
24th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Can the pro-HCQ crowd provide any mechanistic details on how an anti-lysosomal agent interferes with virus endoxcytosys/replication and assembly in an eukaryotic cell.?
I haven't seen any cell biologists on here offering a sliver of explanations of how HCQ specifically thwarts the virus lifecycle. checkpoints without screwing up all cell metabolism
Somebody can come here on RG and advocate drinking blue paint to ward off the virus and it would be taken as valid. if it came from a French quack.
24th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Some years ago I used chloroquine in a series of experiments to inhibit lysosomal mediated degration in tissue culture experiments of chlathrin coated pit endocytosis of receptor-bound ligands.
The experiment worked great for ~1hr at 37oC . All endosomal proteolytic activity was abrogated and endosomes were filled with unprocessed ligands and receptors.
I published those results, but I didn't publish that the cells eventually died because there was no way of washing out the chloroquine from the cells with media changes.
In short: Based on my experience of actually working with chloroquine in tissue culture, I would say that anybody who recommends it for human use should be held criminally liable.
1 Recommendation
Can you contribute to the discussion?

Similar questions and discussions

Why did Fauci not recommend Chloroquine as a treatment for Covid19
Discussion
131 replies
  • Stanley LahamStanley Laham
Why did Dr. Fauci wait 2 months to recommend an expensive patented nucleic acid analog produced by an American Company when he had proof that Chloroquine was effective as both an antiviral and immune regulator to prevent the lethal effect of Covid19??
PUBLISHED IN NATURE, 04 FEBRUARY 2020
Cell Reseach
“Chloroquine, a widely-used anti-malarial and autoimmune disease drug, has recently been reported as a potential broad-spectrum antiviral drug.8,9 Chloroquine is known to block virus infection by increasing endosomal pH required for virus/cell fusion, as well as interfering with the glycosylation of cellular receptors of SARS-CoV.10 Our time-of-addition assay demonstrated that chloroquine functioned at both entry, and at post-entry stages of the 2019-nCoV infection in Vero E6 cells (Fig. 1c, d). Besides its antiviral activity, chloroquine has an immune-modulating activity, which may synergistically enhance its antiviral effect in vivo. Chloroquine is widely distributed in the whole body, including lung, after oral administration. The EC90 value of chloroquine against the 2019-nCoV in Vero E6 cells was 6.90 μM, which can be clinically achievable as demonstrated in the plasma of rheumatoid arthritis patients who received 500 mg administration.11 Chloroquine is a cheap and a safe drug that has been used for more than 70 years and, therefore, it is potentially clinically applicable against the 2019-nCoV.”
Can we use hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) inhaler to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection?
Question
34 answers
  • Gao-De LiGao-De Li
We believe that a combination of a low-dose HCQ and a low-dose ATRA could be a safe and effective strategy for preventing and treating COVID-19. If administration of HCQ and ATRA via inhaler is possible, the drug doses could be further reduced and thus the drug toxicity will be further reduced. Since no vaccine will be available in near future, using HCQ-ATRA inhaler globally to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection is practicable and will help to return life to normal. Therefore, urgent production of this inhaler by pharmaceutical companies worldwide for clinical trial use is needed.
Chloroquine (CQ)/HCQ has genotoxicity that is a double-edged sword, on one hand, it causes harm to human cells, on the other hand it plays an important role in antivirus because it can change cellular susceptibility to virus through altering genome structure which causes gene expression pattern change. This is why CQ/HCQ can exert its antiviral effects on all viral infections. Therefore, to reduce CQ/HCQ's genotoxicity, a low-dose CQ/HCQ must be used. To augment low-dose CQ/HCQ's antiviral activities, another less-toxic genotoxic agent, such as ATRA, could be used together with CQ/HCQ. To further reduce the drug toxicity, local drug administration is necessary, this is why HCQ-ATRA inhaler is proposed. In a word, CQ/HCQ alone (no matter being used at a low dose or a high dose) will not help COVID-19 patients a lot and thus they should be used together with other genotoxic agent.
Taken together, reduction of target cell's susceptibility to virus through altering 3D genome structure in the target cells by genotoxic agents is a novel universal-strategy for preventing and treating all viral infections. Even if this strategy is not 100% effective in protection of people from SARS-CoV-2 infection , it would surely make the infection less- or non-lethal , which will benefit herd immunity and thus contributes to the fight against COVID-19.
More information about this strategy:
Could hay fever help protect against COVID-19?
Question
126 answers
  • Johannes M DijkstraJohannes M Dijkstra
This question relates to possible protection from COVID-19 by IgA antibody in the lungs.
I live in Japan where many people suffer from hay fever (allergic rhinitis), the season of which now is coming to an end.
The immune system protects against SARS-CoV-2 with antibodies, amongst which IgA in the lung lumen should be non-inflammatory, as well as with cytotoxic responses that may induce a strong inflammation followed by ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome). So a stronger reliance on the IgA arm of the immune system upon SARS-CoV-2 infection probably reduces the risk of ARDS(-induced death).
So far, compared to other countries, Japan hasn't been hit very hard by COVID-19, and I wonder whether that may in part be explained by many people having an immune system with "type 2 polarization" caused by the hay fever. If so, that non-specific protection may soon wane if the hay fever season is finished.
To my frustration, I can't find that much information about luminal IgA in the lungs relevant to the above. If anyone can elaborate, I would be grateful.

Related Publications

Article
Full-text available
Rat liver lysosomes, isolated from metrizamide gradients by the method of Wattiaux et al. (Wattiaux, R., Wattiaux-de Coninck, S., Ronveaux-Dupol, M.F., and Dubois, F. (1978) J. Cell Biol. 78, 349-368) took up from the medium and degraded several marker protein preparations, viz. 125I-asialofetuin, [35S]methionine-labeled hemoglobin, and [3H]leucine...
Article
A lysosomal targeting naphthalimide-benzimidazole based probe has been designed, synthesized and evaluated for detecting lysosomal pH changes inside living cells. The probe displays highly selective and sensitive response towards pH changes in aqueous medium. The sensing mechanism involves intramolecular charge transfer from benzimidazole moiety to...
Article
To further evaluate the role of the lysosomal system in insulin degradation, we have compared the effects of inhibitors of lysosomal function on the degradation of 125I-insulin with 125I-asialofetuin, a lysosomally targeted molecule, by the intact, perfused rat liver and the isolated rat hepatocyte. The inhibitors employed were chloroquine (125 mic...




https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5192383/


. 2016 Dec; 8(12): 322.
Published online 2016 Nov 29. doi: 10.3390/v8120322
PMCID: PMC5192383
PMID: 27916837

Chloroquine, an Endocytosis Blocking Agent, Inhibits Zika Virus Infection in Different Cell Models

Michael R. Holbrook, Academic Editor

1. Introduction

Zika virus (ZIKV) is an arthropod-borne virus, transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, that belongs to the Flavivirus genus, which also includes other pathogens such as West Nile virus (WNV), yellow fever virus (YFV), Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), and dengue virus (DENV). Zika virus was first isolated from a sentinel monkey in the Zika forest in Uganda in 1947 []. Since then, ZIKV has been isolated from humans and mosquitoes throughout Africa and Southeast Asian countries. Phylogenetic analysis of the nonstructural protein 5 encoding region has disclosed three ZIKV lineages: East African, West African, and Asian []. Sequences from Uganda and Senegal belong to the East African cluster, while sequences from Nigeria and also some sequences from Senegal are clustered on the West African lineage []. Most of the viral sequences recovered from recent outbreaks, from 2007 until now, belong to the Asian lineage, such as strains isolated in American, South Asian, and Pacific countries. In utero exposure to Asian lineage ZIKV might lead to microcephaly and other developmental malformations including calcifications, arthrogryposis, ventriculomegaly, lissencephaly, cerebellar atrophy, and ocular abnormalities [,,,,]. Although all ZIKV lineages can infect humans, these severe manifestations reported after in utero infection have only been associated with Asian lineages, including Brazilian isolates [,].

Asian ZIKV strains were detected in the brain and amniotic fluid of newborns and stillborns with microcephaly [,,,,] and the African MR766 strain was shown to kill human neuroprogenitor cells in vitro as well as decrease the growth rate of brain organoids [,].

Symptoms of infections with the Asian ZIKV include low-grade fever, headache, rash, conjunctivitis, arthritis, and myalgia [,]. Mild symptoms such as headache and low-grade fever were reported by a human volunteer during infection with the African ZIKV strain []. However, in rare instances, infection with the Asian ZIKV is associated with cases of Guillain–Barré syndrome [] and meningoencephalitis []. Currently, there is no vaccine or specific therapeutic approaches to prevent or treat ZIKV infections. With the alarming increase in the number of countries affected and the potential for viral spread through global travel and sexual transmission [,], there is an urgent need to find a treatment capable of lessening the effects of the disease and inhibiting further transmission.

Chloroquine, a 4-aminoquinoline, is a weak base that is rapidly imported into acidic vesicles, increasing their pH []. It is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat malaria and has long been prophylactically prescribed to pregnant women at risk of exposure to Plasmodium parasites []. Chloroquine, through the inhibition of pH-dependent steps of viral replication, restricts human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [], influenza virus [], DENV [], JEV [], and WNV infection []. Here we investigated the antiviral effects of chloroquine on both Asian (using a Brazilian isolate) and African ZIKV infections in different cell types.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

Vero cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) are derived from the kidney of African green monkey and were grown in DMEM High Glucose (GIBCO, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (GIBCO). Human brain microvascular endothelial cells (hBMEC) were a kind gift from Dr. Julio Scharfstein (Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), and hBMEC isolation was performed as previously described []. These cells were cultured in DMEM High Glucose supplemented with 20% FBS. The C6/36 cell line is derived from Aedes albopictus. C6/36 cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were grown in Leibovitz L-15 medium (GIBCO) supplemented with 2.95 g/L tryptose phosphate broth (Sigma Aldrich, Boston, MA, USA), 2 mM glutamine (GIBCO), 0.075% sodium bicarbonate (GIBCO), 1X non-essential amino acids (GIBCO) and 5% FBS. Neural stem cells (NSCs) were derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). iPSCs were provided by the Biobank of iPSCs of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (CONEP B-027 # 25000.111598/2014-04). According to the supplier, fibroblasts were reprogrammed using the protocol developed by Paulsen et al. [], and transduced with the CytoTune-iPS Sendai kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). iPSCs presented a normal karyotype and the expression of pluripotency markers. These cells were cultured with E8 culture media (GIBCO) on a Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) coated surface. iPSC colonies were manually passaged every 5–7 days until they reached 70%–80% confluence and were maintained at 37 °C in humidified air with 5% CO2. To produce NSCs, human iPSCs were exposed to the serum-free neural induction medium (GIBCO), containing Neurobasal medium (GIBCO) and the pluripotent stem cell neural induction supplement (GIBCO), according to the manufacturer’s protocol []. Briefly, the medium was changed every other day until day 7, when initial NSCs are split and grown on neural expansion medium (Advanced DMEM/F12 and neurobasal medium (1:1) with neural induction supplement; GIBCO). NSCs were used after four passages in neural expansion media. Mouse central nervous system (CNS) cells were harvested from Swiss mouse embryos at embryo day 14 (E14) and grown for 72 h as free floating neurospheres in neurobasal culture media (GIBCO) supplemented with 1X B27 (GIBCO).

2.2. Compounds

Chloroquine diphosphate was kindly supplied by FarManguinhos (Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). The lyophilized powder was diluted in double distilled water to 20 mM. The chloroquine solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane and stored at −80 °C.

2.3. Viruses

ZIKV strain MR 766 (Uganda/Africa, accession no.: NC012532.1, kindly provided by Dr. Davis Ferreira, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) was isolated from a rhesus monkey and injected intracerebrally on Swiss mice for several passages [] and ZIKV BR (Recife/Brazil, ZIKV PE/243, accession no: KX197192.1, kindly provided by Dr. Marli Tenório Cordeiro, Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães, Recife, Brazil) was isolated from a patient presenting classical symptoms of ZIKV infection []. These viruses were propagated in Vero and C6/36 cells, respectively. Briefly, the cells were infected with ZIKV at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01 and incubated at 37 °C. After 1 h, the inoculum was removed and replaced with DMEM high-glucose (Vero) and Leibovitz L-15 (C6/36) growth media supplemented with 2% FBS. After 4 to 6 days, the conditioned medium was harvested, centrifuged at 300× g, and sterile-filtered to remove cells and cellular debris. Virus stocks were stored at −80 °C.

2.4. Plaque Assay

Virus titers were determined by plaque assay performed on Vero cells. Virus stocks or samples were serially diluted and adsorbed to confluent monolayers. After 1 h, the inoculum was removed and cells were overlaid with semisolid medium constituted of alpha-MEM (GIBCO) containing 1% carboxymethyl cellulose (Sigma Aldrich) and 1% FBS (GIBCO). Cells were further incubated for 5 days when cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde. Cells were stained with 1% crystal violet in 20% ethanol for plaque visualization. Titers were expressed as plaque forming units (PFU) per milliliter.

2.5. Quantification of ZIKV-Infected Cells by Flow Cytometry

Vero cells, hBMEC, and NSC were infected with ZIKV MR 766 or ZIKV BR strain at an MOI of 2. After 1 h, the inoculum was removed and medium containing chloroquine (6.25 to 50 μM) was added to the cells. After 4 to 5 days, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma Aldrich) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 15 min at room temperature and washed with PBS. Cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma Aldrich) in PBS, washed with PBS, and blocked with PBS with 5% FBS. Cells were incubated with 4G2, a pan-flavivirus antibody raised against the ZIKV envelope E protein produced in 4G2-4-15 hybridoma (ATCC), diluted 1:5 in PBS with 5% FBS. Cells were labeled with donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 antibody (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) diluted 1:1000 in PBS with 5% FBS, and were analyzed by flow cytometry in a BD Accuri C6 (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for ZIKV infection.

2.6. Immunofluorescence Assay

Vero, hBMEC, and NSC were seeded on black 96-well plates with clear bottoms and infected with ZIKV MR 766 or ZIKV BR strain at an MOI of 2 for 1 h. Neurospheres were seeded on coverslips and infected with ZIKV MR766 with 2.5 × 105 PFU After infection, the viral inoculum was removed and cells were incubated with medium containing chloroquine (1.56 to 50 μM) for 4 to 5 days, depending on cell type. Cells and neurospheres were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at room temperature. The fixative was removed and the samples were washed three times with PBS. Blocking of unspecific binding of the antibody and permeabilization were performed with PBS supplemented with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma Aldrich) and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 40 min at room temperature. Incubation with anti-Map2 antibody was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions (ABCAM, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK, #32454; 1:1000) and the 4G2 antibody was diluted 1:4 in PBS with 3% BSA and incubated with cells for 1 h. After washing three times with PBS, cells were incubated with secondary antibodies coupled to Alexa fluorochromes (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 40 min and washed five times. Coverslips with neurospheres were mounted with Prolong Gold mounting medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were imaged using either Leica SP5 or Leica SPE (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Hesse, DE) confocal microscopes and a Nikon TE300 (Tokyo, Japan) inverted microscope coupled to a Leica DFC310FX camera (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany).

2.7. Virus Infection Inhibition Through Cell Viability Assay

Vero, hBMEC, and NSC were exposed to ZIKV MR 766 at an MOI of 2. After 1 h, inoculum was removed and chloroquine-containing medium (6.25 to 50 μM) was added to the cells. Five days post-infection, 20 μL of CellTiter Blue reagent (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was added in each well, incubated for 12–16 h, and fluorescence was measured (560/590 nm), except for NSCp14 cells when CellTiter Blue was added at three days post-infection. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and standard deviation were displayed. In order to calculate the half maximum effective concentration (EC50) that protects cells from death caused by ZIKV infection, MFI values from ZIKV MR766 control were subtracted from every condition and then these values were normalized over the mock control. These data were plotted and Hill 4 parameter sigmoidal regression was performed on Sigma Plot v.12.0 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

2.8. Drug Cytotoxicity Assay

Vero cells, hBMEC, and NSC were incubated with medium containing chloroquine (1.56 to 200 μM) for 3 days (NSC) or 5 days (Vero and hBMEC). CellTiter Blue reagent (Promega) was added in each well, incubated for 12–16 h, and fluorescence was measured (560/590 nm). In order to calculate the 50% cytotoxicity concentration (CC50), MFI values were normalized over the untreated control. These data were plotted and Hill 4 parameter sigmoidal regression was performed on Sigma Plot v.12.0 (Systat Software Inc.).

2.9. Time-of-Addition Assay

Vero cells were inoculated with ZIKV MR 766 at an MOI of 10 for 1 h at 4 °C. Cells were washed three times with cold PBS to remove unbound virus and treated with 50 μM chloroquine that was added at different time points: 0, 0.5, 3, 12, and 24 h post-infection. Conditioned media were collected at 30 h post-infection to analyze the production of virus particles through viral RNA content or the amount of infectious virus particles. Viral RNA was extracted and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed. The titer of infectious virus particles was determined by plaque assay.

2.10. ZIKV Inhibition Assessed by Virus Production

Vero cells were infected with ZIKV MR766 or ZIKV BR strain at an MOI of 2 for 1 h at 4 °C. Virus input was washed three times with cold PBS and cells were treated with chloroquine (6.25 to 50 μM) for 48 h, and then the supernatant was collected and the RNA was extracted and analyzed by relative quantification by RT-qPCR. The supernatant was also evaluated by plaque assay to quantitate the infectious virus particles.

2.11. Viral RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR

Viral RNA was extracted from 200 μL supernatant of infected cells using QIAmp MiniElute Virus Spin (QIAgen, Hilden, Düsseldorf ,DE), following the manufacturer’s recommendations. ZIKV detection was performed using One Step Taqman RT-qPCR (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with primers and the probe described elsewhere []. Threshold cycle (CT) was determined and ∆CT (CT chloroquine treated − CT untreated) was calculated. The fold reduction of virus particles’ release, including defective viral particles, were calculated by 2∆Ct.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

Mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for each assay. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted using the non-parametric test (Kruskal–Wallis) followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed on GraphPad Prism v.7 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The sample size is provided in the respective figure legends.

3. Results

3.1. Chloroquine Inhibits ZIKV Infection in Vero Cells

We characterized the antiviral properties of chloroquine in Vero cells, a model widely used to study viral infections. Vero cells were infected with ZIKV MR766 at an MOI of 2 (i.e., 2 PFU/cell) and were then treated for 5 days with chloroquine in concentrations ranging from 6.25 to 50 μM. Viral infectivity was assessed using the 4G2 antibody, which detects flavivirus envelope E protein. We observed that chloroquine treatment decreased the number of ZIKV-infected cells in a dose-dependent manner. Flow cytometry analysis showed a reduction of 35% and 65% in ZIKV-infected cells when cultures were treated with 25 μM and 50 μM chloroquine, respectively, compared to untreated infected cells (Figure 1A). Immunofluorescence staining corroborated these results (Figure 1B) and additionally, chloroquine decreased the production of infectious (Figure 1C) and total (Figure 1D) virus particles, including defective viral particles, by ZIKV-infected cells. To confirm that viral inhibition is independent of chloroquine cytotoxicity, the viability of uninfected cells treated with chloroquine (1.56 to 200 μM) for 5 days was analyzed. Chloroquine did not impact cell viability at concentrations of 50 μM or lower (Figure 1E). We further analyzed whether chloroquine treatment could protect Vero cells from ZIKV infection as assessed by cell viability. Chloroquine, ranging from 12.5 to 50 μM, increased cell viability from 55% up to 100% (Figure 1F).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is viruses-08-00322-g001.jpg

Inhibition of Zika virus (ZIKV) infection by chloroquine in Vero cells. (A) Vero cells were infected with ZIKV MR766 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2, treated with chloroquine for 5 days, and were then stained for the viral envelope protein and analyzed by flow cytometry; (B) Vero cells were infected, treated for 2 days, and ZIKV infection was evaluated by immunofluorescence staining with 4G2 antibody (green) and DAPI (blue); Infectious (C) or total (D) virus particles were quantified on the supernatant 48 h post-infection. Titers are expressed as plaque forming units (PFU) per milliliter. The dashed line represents no reduction in RNA levels; (E) Cell viability of uninfected cells treated with increasing concentrations of chloroquine was evaluated by fluorescence measurement at 560/590 nm after viability dye incubation; (F) Protection against ZIKV infection was evaluated through cell viability in ZIKV-infected Vero cells treated with chloroquine for 5 days. Data are represented as mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) ± standard deviation (SD) from two to four independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and multiple comparisons with infected and untreated control corrected by Dunn’s test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0,005).

3.2. Chloroquine Inhibits Infection of Asian ZIKV Strains

Microcephaly cases and neurological disorders have only been associated with infection with strains of ZIKV from the Asian lineage, detected in French Polynesia and in the Americas [,,]. To determine the inhibition spectrum of chloroquine against ZIKV infection, Vero cells were infected with the Brazilian isolate of the Asian lineage (ZIKV BR). Chloroquine decreases the percentage of cells infected with the Brazilian isolate from 70% to 30% and 5% at 12.5 and 25 μM, respectively (Figure 2A,C). Moreover, viral RNA levels in the supernatant of Vero cells were quantified as a direct measurement of ZIKV infection. Treatment with 25 μM chloroquine led to a 16-fold reduction in the level of viral RNA detected in the supernatant (Figure 2B).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is viruses-08-00322-g002.jpg

Chloroquine inhibits infection by Asian lineage. (A) Vero cells were infected with Brazilian ZIKV strain at an MOI of 2, treated with chloroquine at the indicated concentrations for 5 days, and the frequency of infected cells was evaluated by flow cytometry; (B) Vero cells were infected with Brazilian strain at an MOI of 2 and exposed to chloroquine for 48 h. The supernatant was collected and viral RNA was relatively quantified over the untreated infected control (B) or infectivity was analyzed by immunofluorescence with 4G2 antibody (C). The dashed line represents fold reduction on virus production of 1. Data are represented as mean ± SD from two independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed by Kruskal–Wallis test and multiple comparisons with infected and untreated control corrected by Dunn’s test (* p < 0.05).

3.3. Chloroquine Inhibits Early Stages of ZIKV Infection

Inhibition of viral infection mediated by chloroquine can occur in both the early and later stages of the viral replication cycle [,]. To evaluate which step of the viral cycle was susceptible to inhibition, chloroquine was added to Vero cells at different time points post-infection with ZIKV MR766. The supernatant was collected 30 h post-infection and virus production was evaluated by relative quantification of viral RNA over the untreated control by RT-qPCR. Virus titers were also determined by plaque assay in Vero cells. Incubation of Vero cells with chloroquine at 0 h post-infection had a greater impact on the production of ZIKV particles, decreasing viral RNA 64-fold over the controls (Figure 3A). The addition of chloroquine from 30 min to 12 h post-infection was able to reduce virus release 9–20 fold over untreated, infected-cells. However, chloroquine added at 24 h post-infection had only a minor effect on viral production (Figure 3A). These results were confirmed by quantification of ZIKV infectious particles released after chloroquine treatment (Figure 3B). These data confirm that chloroquine interferes with the early stages of the ZIKV replication cycle.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is viruses-08-00322-g003.jpg

Early stages of infection are inhibited by chloroquine. Vero cells were infected with ZIKV MR766 at an MOI of 10 and 50 μM chloroquine was added at different times post-infection. At 30 h post-infection, the supernatant was collected and viral RNA (A) or infectious particles (B) were quantified. Viral RNA reduction is represented in fold change (2∆Ct). The dashed line represents no reduction in RNA levels. Infectious particles are depicted as PFU/mL. Data are represented as mean ± SD from two independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed with Kruskal–Wallis test and multiple comparisons with infected and untreated control corrected by Dunn’s test (* p < 0.05).

3.4. Chloroquine Reduces ZIKV Infection in hBMEC, an In Vitro Model of the Blood–Brain Barrier

Considering that ZIKV infects hBMECs [], we investigated whether chloroquine could inhibit viral infection of these cells. Chloroquine reduced 45% and 50% of the number of ZIKV MR766-infected hBMECs at 25 and 50 μM, respectively (Figure 4A,D). These concentrations are non-cytotoxic (Figure 4B), and protected approximately 80% of hBMECs from ZIKV infection as demonstrated by the increase in cell viability (Figure 4C).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is viruses-08-00322-g004.jpg

Chloroquine reduces the number of ZIKV-infected human brain microvascular endothelial cells (hBMECs). (A) hBMECs were infected with ZIKV MR 766 at an MOI of 2 followed by chloroquine treatment for 5 days. Cells were stained with the 4G2 antibody and analyzed by flow cytometry; (B) Uninfected hBMECs were incubated with chloroquine for 5 days and cell viability was analyzed; (C) Protection against ZIKV infection was measured through cell viability in chloroquine-treated ZIKV-infected cells; (D) Immunofluorescence with 4G2 antibody (green) and DAPI (blue) of ZIKV-infected cells treated with chloroquine for 5 days. Data are represented as mean ± SD from two independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed by Kruskal–Wallis test and multiple comparisons with infected and untreated control corrected by Dunn’s test (* p < 0.05).

3.5. Chloroquine Inhibits ZIKV Infection in Human Neural Progenitor Cells

Neural stem cells are key cells in the process of corticogenesis, giving rise to the three main cell types of the central nervous system: neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. Depletion of the NSC pool is one of the main mechanisms responsible for primary microcephaly []. To evaluate if chloroquine could protect these cells from ZIKV MR766 infection, NSCs were exposed to up to 50 μM chloroquine for 4 days. Chloroquine treatment decreased the number of NSCs infected with ZIKV MR766 by 57%, and, through cell viability assessment protected 70% of NSCs from ZIKV infection, without cytotoxicity effects (Figure 5A–D). Similar results were observed when NSCs were infected with the Brazilian strain (Figure 5E).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is viruses-08-00322-g005.jpg

Chloroquine inhibits ZIKV infection in human neural stem cells (hNSCs). hNSCs were infected with ZIKV MR766 at an MOI of 2 and incubated with increasing concentrations of chloroquine for 4 days. (A) The frequency of ZIKV-infected cells was analyzed by 4G2 staining and flow cytometry; (B) Chloroquine cytotoxicity was assessed by the viability of uninfected hNSCs treated with chloroquine; (C) Chloroquine treatment protection from ZIKV infection was evaluated by cell viability measurement at 4 days post-infection. Immunofluorescence NSCs infected with ZIKV MR766 (D) or ZIKV BR (E) at an MOI of 2 and treated with chloroquine for 4 days with 4G2 antibody (green) and DAPI (blue). Data are represented as mean ± SD from two to three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed with Kruskal–Wallis test and multiple comparisons with infected and untreated control corrected by Dunn’s test (* p < 0.05).

3.6. Chloroquine Inhibits ZIKV Infection in Mouse Neurospheres

Neuroprogenitor-enriched neurospheres, when subjected to differentiation culture conditions, can generate neurons. Our group recently demonstrated that ZIKV infection affected neurosphere size, neurite extension, and neuronal differentiation []. As we previously observed, neurospheres infected with ZIKV strain MR766 showed convoluted and misshapen neurites. Neurite extension was evaluated in chloroquine treated cultures by microtubule-associated protein 2 (Map2) staining and phase contrast microscopy and although many neurospheres were severely impacted by the infection, many others displayed the same general characteristics of mock-infected spheres indicating that chloroquine treatment rescued the neurite extension phenotype (Figure 6A–C). Furthermore, ZIKV infection decreased when neurospheres were treated with 12.5 μM chloroquine, as evaluated by 4G2 staining (Figure 6D–F).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is viruses-08-00322-g006.jpg

Chloroquine inhibits ZIKV infection in mouse neurospheres. Mouse neurospheres were infected with ZIKV MR766 (2.5 × 105 PFU and were treated with chloroquine for 3 days. Neurospheres were analyzed by phase contrast microscopy (A–C), and triple stained for envelope viral protein (green), microtubule-associated protein 2 (Map-2, red), a neuron-specific protein, and DAPI (blue) (D–F).

4. Discussion

Chloroquine is known to be a non-specific antiviral agent, but its effect on the Zika virus replication has not been evaluated yet. This is the first report of inhibitory effects of chloroquine on ZIKV replication, which, given the ongoing epidemics, may become interesting both for the scientific knowledge of the virus and for the clinical perspective.

Although Zika virus was first identified in Uganda in 1947, from January 2007 to April 2016, ZIKV transmission has been reported in 64 countries and territories []. The Zika virus disease is in general mild, but the recent positive correlation between infection, congenital malformations, and neurological damage in adults has intensified the need for therapeutic approaches. Prophylactic treatments for women intending to get pregnant in epidemic areas and travelers going to affected countries would represent relevant tools to reduce ZIKV transmission and avoid the spread of the disease by travelers. Moreover, a drug that blocks placental transfer of the virus could decrease the chance of vertical transmission in viremic pregnant women as was shown for HIV-infected pregnant women treated with antiretroviral therapy [].

Here we demonstrated that chloroquine decreases the number of ZIKV-infected cells and protected cells from ZIKV infection as measured by cell viability at non-cytotoxic concentrations (Figure 1, Figure 4 and Figure 5). The EC50 or concentration of chloroquine that protected 50% of the cells from ZIKV infection assessed by cell viability, was 9.82–14.2 μM depending on the cell model and the CC50 ranged from 94.95 to 134.54 μM (Table 1). The values of EC50 obtained for ZIKV MR766 are lower than those obtained for DENV inhibition (~25 μM) and HIV inhibition (100 μM) [,]. Furthermore, we observed similar ZIKV inhibitory effects of chloroquine when tested on different ZIKV lineage infections (Figure 2 and Figure 5), supporting the idea that chloroquine could help to manage recent infections caused by Asian ZIKV lineage.

Table 1

Pharmacological parameters of chloroquine in each cell type against ZIKV MR766.

Cell TypeCC50EC50TI
Vero134.54 ± 16.76 μM9.82 ± 2.79 μM13.70
hBMEC116.61 ± 9.70 μM14.20 ± 0.18 μM8.21
hNSC94.95 ± 9.38 μM12.36 ± 2.76 μM7.68

CC50: 50% cytotoxicity concentration; EC50: half maximal effective concentration; TI: therapeutic index (CC50/EC50). Data are represented as mean ± SD.

Although chloroquine has shown antiviral activity against a large spectrum of viruses in vitro, few clinical studies have been performed to evaluate chloroquine effects on patients with viral infections. Two clinical trial studies of chloroquine have been conducted to assess chloroquine treatment in patients infected with DENV [,]. One of the trials evaluated the benefits of chloroquine treatment for 3 days in patients infected with DENV and showed no reduction in the duration or intensity of DENV viremia or nonstructural 1 protein (NS1) antigenemia clearance []. However, a trend towards a reduction in the number of dengue hemorrhagic fever cases was noticed in the chloroquine-treated group []. A more recent clinical trial of chloroquine administration to DENV-infected patients, also for 3 days, showed that 60% of the patients in the chloroquine-treated group reported feeling less pain and showed improvement in the performance of daily chores during treatment []. Moreover, the symptoms returned after medication withdrawal. However, chloroquine treatment did not reduce the duration and intensity of the fever or duration of the disease []. The antiviral effect of chloroquine may be insufficient to produce a decrease in viral load or improvement of the disease progression when chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine is used in monotherapy. However, chloroquine may produce a significant antiflaviviral effect when used in combination therapies, as recently shown in a clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine plus ribavirin and interferon alpha in individuals infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) []. In regard to the potential antiviral therapeutic combinations for Zika, a freshly published screening of drugs already approved for other clinical indications has resulted in the identification of more than 20 candidate drugs []. Of note, one of these is mefloquine, a compound related to chloroquine. In terms of safety for pregnant women, however, mefloquine is included in the B category, i.e., a drug for which the animal reproduction studies have failed to demonstrate a risk to the fetus and there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Be that as it may, the aforementioned study corroborates our results using chloroquine, and provides new anti-ZIKV drugs that could be tested in combination with chloroquine.

Differing from mefloquine administration, the use of chloroquine during pregnancy was thoroughly evaluated and when prophylactic doses of chloroquine were administered for malaria (400 mg/week), no increment in birth defects was observed []. Higher concentrations of chloroquine (250 mg to 500 mg/day) were administered to pregnant women with severe diseases, such as lupus or rheumatoid arthritis. In these studies, few cases of abortion and fetal toxicity were observed. However, fetal toxicity or death could not be discarded as direct consequences of the disease itself. In addition, all term deliveries resulted in healthy newborns [,].

Chloroquine has been successfully tested in animal models. Twice daily administration of chloroquine (90 mg/kg) has been shown to increase the Balb/c mice survival rate to 80%–90% after infection with Ebola virus (EBOV) []. In a C57BL/6 mice model for coronavirus infection, chloroquine (50 mg/kg) protected 100% of 5-day-old suckling mice infected with human coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43) when administered to pregnant mice 1 day prepartum []. A survival rate of 70% was observed in Balb/c mice infected with avian influenza H5N1 virus treated with chloroquine at 50 mg/kg/day []. These results suggest that chloroquine has the potential to inhibit ZIKV in in vivo mouse studies.

Chloroquine is widely distributed to body tissues as well as its analogue hydroxychloroquine. The concentration of hydroxychloroquine in the brain is 4–30 times higher than in the plasma []. The concentration of chloroquine in the plasma reached 10 μM when a daily intake of 500 mg was prescribed to arthritis patients []. Chloroquine is able to cross the placental barrier and is supposed to reach similar concentrations in both maternal and fetal plasma []. Concentrations of chloroquine, similar to the EC50 values calculated here (Table 1), are achieved in the plasma in current chloroquine administration protocols and might reach the brain.

Different mechanisms for the chloroquine inhibition of viral infection have been described [,,]. We observed a strong reduction in the release of ZIKV particles when the drug was added at 0 h post-infection (Figure 3), suggesting a higher impact on early stages of infection, possibly during fusion of the envelope protein to the endosome membrane. Chloroquine inhibits acidification of the endosome, consequently inhibiting the low pH-induced conformational changes required for the fusion of the envelope protein of flaviviruses with the endosomal membrane []. Chloroquine was also effective in decreasing virus release, although less pronouncedly and not statistically significant, when added after the early stages of virus infection (from 0.5 to 24 h post-infection), suggesting that later stages of the ZIKV replication cycle might also be affected (Figure 3).

ZIKV was detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of ZIKV-infected adult patients that manifested meningoencephalitis, indicating that ZIKV invades the central nervous system through yet unknown mechanisms. Transcytosis through the endothelial cells of the blood brain barrier is a known mechanism of viral access to the central nervous system [,]. Here we demonstrated, by different methodologies, that chloroquine protects hBMEC, an immortalized cell line widely used as in vitro model of the blood–brain barrier [], from ZIKV infection (Figure 4).

Recent studies showed that neural stem cells are highly permissive for ZIKV infection and one of the mechanisms proposed for the cause of microcephaly would be the depletion of the stem cell pool induced by ZIKV [,,]. Our data showed that chloroquine inhibits the infection of human neural stem cells (Figure 5). Using the mouse neurospheres model to study neural stem cell differentiation into neurons, another process that might be disturbed in microcephaly, we observed that chloroquine inhibited the infection of neuronal progenitors and partially protected the ability of these cells to extend neurites (Figure 6). The protective effect of chloroquine on stem cells and committed progenitors is potentially a groundbreaking feature of this compound, as it would be prescribed to women at childbearing age that are traveling to affected countries and women planning pregnancy in endemic areas. This would decrease the chances of infection and thus fetal damage, especially to the developing brain.

Our results suggest that the chloroquine concentrations inhibiting ZIKV replication in vitro may overlap the highest drug concentrations detected in humans []. We therefore suggest that the therapeutic potential of chloroquine for Zika be subjected to further study.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento e Pesquisa (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), and Departamento de Doenças Sexualmente Transmissiveis, AIDS e Hepatites Virais do Ministério da Saúde do Brasil. The authors acknowledge Manoel Itamar for providing technical support.

Author Contributions

R.D., L.M.H., P.P., A.L.V. designed and performed experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; P.P.G. designed and performed experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; F.L.M. designed and performed experiments, prepared figures and/or tables and analyzed the data; E.C.L., A.A.D., F.J.M.S., M.T.A., E.A.C. performed experiments; M.B., D.H.O., S.R., R.S.d.A., J.E.O., A.S. designed and/or performed experiments, contributed with reagents/materials/analysis tools and wrote the manuscript; L.C. and A.T. designed and performed experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, analyzed the data, contributed with reagents/materials/analysis tools, and wrote the~manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Dick G.W.A., Kitchen S.F., Haddow A.J. Zika virus. I. Isolations and serological specificity. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1952;46:509–520. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(52)90042-4. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
2. Lanciotti R.S., Kosoy O.L., Laven J.J., Velez J.O., Lambert A.J., Johnson A.J., Stanfield S.M., Duffy M.R. Genetic and serologic properties of Zika virus associated with an epidemic, Yap State, Micronesia, 2007. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008;14:1232–1239. doi: 10.3201/eid1408.080287. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
3. Faye O., Freire C.C.M., Iamarino A., Faye O., de Oliveira J.V.C., Diallo M., Zanotto P.M.A., Sall A.A. Molecular evolution of Zika virus during its emergence in the 20th century. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014;8:e2636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002636. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
4. Brasil P., Pereira J.P., Jr., Raja Gabaglia C., Damasceno L., Wakimoto M., Ribeiro Nogueira R.M., Carvalho de Sequeira P., Machado Siqueira A., Abreu de Carvalho L.M., Cotrim da Cunha D., et al. Zika Virus Infection in Pregnant Women in Rio de Janeiro—Preliminary Report. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602412. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
5. Martines R.B., Bhatnagar J., Keating M.K., Silva-Flannery L., Muehlenbachs A., Gary J., Goldsmith C., Hale G., Ritter J., Rollin D., et al. Notes from the Field: Evidence of Zika Virus Infection in Brain and Placental Tissues from Two Congenitally Infected Newborns and Two Fetal Losses —Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2016;65:1–2. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6506e1er. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
6. Mlakar J., Korva M., Tul N., Popović M., Poljšak-Prijatelj M., Mraz J., Kolenc M., Resman Rus K., Vesnaver Vipotnik T., Fabjan Vodušek V., et al. Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:951–958. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600651. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
7. Oliveira Melo A.S., Malinger G., Ximenes R., Szejnfeld P.O., Alves Sampaio S., Bispo De Filippis A.M. Zika virus intrauterine infection causes fetal brain abnormality and microcephaly: Tip of the iceberg? Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2016;47:6–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.15831. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
8. Melo A.S., Aguiar R.S., Amorim M.M., Arruda M.B., Melo F.O., Ribeiro S.T., Batista A.G., Ferreira T., Dos Santos M.P., Sampaio V.V., et al. Congenital Zika Virus Infection: Beyond Neonatal Microcephaly. JAMA Neurol. 2016:1–10. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.3720. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
9. Calvet G., Aguiar R.S., Melo A.S.O., Sampaio S.A., de Filippis I., Fabri A., Araujo E.S.M., de Sequeira P.C., de Mendonça M.C.L., de Oliveira L., et al. Detection and sequencing of Zika virus from amniotic fluid of fetuses with microcephaly in Brazil: A case study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016;16:653–660. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00095-5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
10. Garcez P.P., Loiola E.C., Madeiro da Costa R., Higa L.M., Trindade P., Delvecchio R., Nascimento J.M., Brindeiro R., Tanuri A., Rehen S.K. Zika virus impairs growth in human neurospheres and brain organoids. Science. 2016;352:816–818. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6116. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
11. Tang H., Hammack C., Ogden S.C., Jin P. Zika Virus Infects Human Cortical Neural Progenitors and Attenuates Their Growth. Stem Cell. 2016:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.02.016. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
12. Duffy M.R., Chen T.-H., Hancock W.T., Powers A.M., Kool J.L., Lanciotti R.S., Pretrick M., Marfel M., Holzbauer S., Dubray C., et al. Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:2536–2543. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805715. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
13. Bearcroft W.G. Zika virus infection experimentally induced in a human volunteer. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1956;50:442–448. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(56)90090-6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
14. Cao-Lormeau V.-M., Blake A., Mons S., Lastère S., Roche C., Vanhomwegen J., Dub T., Baudouin L., Teissier A., Larre P., et al. Guillain–Barré Syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in French Polynesia: A case-control study. Lancet (Lond. Engl.) 2016;387:1531–1539. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00562-6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
15. Carteaux G., Maquart M., Bedet A., Contou D., Brugières P., Fourati S., Cleret de Langavant L., de Broucker T., Brun-Buisson C., Leparc-Goffart I., et al. Zika Virus Associated with Meningoencephalitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:1595–1596. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1602964. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
16. D’Ortenzio E., Matheron S., de Lamballerie X., Hubert B., Piorkowski G., Maquart M., Descamps D., Damond F., Yazdanpanah Y., Leparc-Goffart I. Evidence of Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:2195–2198. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1604449. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
17. Deckard D.T., Chung W.M., Brooks J.T., Smith J.C., Woldai S., Hennessey M., Kwit N., Mead P. Male-to-Male Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus - Texas, January 2016. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2016;65:372–374. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6514a3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
18. Browning D. Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine Retinopathy. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2014. Pharmacology of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine; pp. 35–63. []
19. Levy M., Buskila D., Gladman D., Urowitz M., Koren G. Pregnancy Outcome Following First Trimester Exposure to Chloroquine. Am. J. Perinatol. 1991;8:174–178. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999371. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
20. Tsai W.P., Nara P.L., Kung H.F., Oroszlan S. Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus infectivity by chloroquine. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 1990;6:481–489. doi: 10.1089/aid.1990.6.481. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
21. Ooi E.E., Chew J.S.W., Loh J.P., Chua R.C.S. In vitro inhibition of human influenza A virus replication by chloroquine. Virol. J. 2006;3:39. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-3-39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
22. Farias K.J.S., Machado P.R.L., da Fonseca B.A.L. Chloroquine inhibits dengue virus type 2 replication in Vero cells but not in C6/36 cells. Sci. World J. 2013;2013:282734. doi: 10.1155/2013/282734. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
23. Zhu Y., Xu Q., Wu D., Ren H., Zhao P., Lao W., Wang Y., Tao Q., Qian X., Wei Y.-H., et al. Japanese encephalitis virus enters rat neuroblastoma cells via a pH-dependent, dynamin and caveola-mediated endocytosis pathway. J. Virol. 2012;86:13407–13422. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00903-12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
24. Boonyasuppayakorn S., Reichert E.D., Manzano M., Nagarajan K., Padmanabhan R. Amodiaquine, an antimalarial drug, inhibits dengue virus type 2 replication and infectivity. Antivir. Res. 2014;106:125–134. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.03.014. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
25. Stins M.F., Badger J., Sik Kim K. Bacterial invasion and transcytosis in transfected human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Microb. Pathog. 2001;30:19–28. doi: 10.1006/mpat.2000.0406. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
26. Paulsen B.d.S., Maciel R.d.M., Galina A., da Silveira M.S., Souza C.d.S., Drummond H., Pozzatto E.N., Junior H.S., Chicaybam L., Massuda R., et al. Altered Oxygen Metabolism Associated to Neurogenesis of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived From a Schizophrenic Patient. Cell Transplant. 2012;21:1547–1559. doi: 10.3727/096368911X600957. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
27. Yan Y., Shin S., Jha B.S., Liu Q., Sheng J., Li F., Zhan M., Davis J., Bharti K., Zeng X., et al. Efficient and rapid derivation of primitive neural stem cells and generation of brain subtype neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2013;2:862–870. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2013-0080. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
28. Donald C.L., Brennan B., Cumberworth S.L., Rezelj V.V., Clark J.J., Cordeiro M.T., Freitas de Oliveira França R., Pena L.J., Wilkie G.S., Da Silva Filipe A., et al. Full Genome Sequence and sfRNA Interferon Antagonist Activity of Zika Virus from Recife, Brazil. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016;10:e0005048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005048. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
29. Cao-Lormeau V.-M., Roche C., Teissier A., Robin E., Berry A.-L., Mallet H.-P., Sall A.A., Musso D. Zika virus, French polynesia, South pacific, 2013. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014;20:1085–1086. doi: 10.3201/eid2011.141380. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
30. Diaz-Griffero F., Hoschander S.A., Brojatsch J. Endocytosis is a critical step in entry of subgroup B avian leukosis viruses. J. Virol. 2002;76:12866–12876. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.24.12866-12876.2002. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
31. Harley C.A., Dasgupta A., Wilson D.W. Characterization of herpes simplex virus-containing organelles by subcellular fractionation: role for organelle acidification in assembly of infectious particles. J. Virol. 2001;75:1236–1251. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.3.1236-1251.2001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
32. Bayer A., Lennemann N.J., Ouyang Y., Bramley J.C., Morosky S., Marques E.T.D.A., Cherry S., Sadovsky Y., Coyne C.B. Type III Interferons Produced by Human Placental Trophoblasts Confer Protection against Zika Virus Infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19:705–712. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.03.008. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
33. Gilmore E.C., Walsh C.A. Genetic causes of microcephaly and lessons for neuronal development. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2013;2:461–478. doi: 10.1002/wdev.89. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
34. Campanati L., Higa L.M., Delvecchio R., Pezzuto P., De Filippis A.M.B., Aguiar R.S., Tanuri A. The Impact of African and Brazilian ZIKV isolates on neuroprogenitors. BioRxiv. 2016:1–25. []
35. WHO . Zika Virus Microcephaly and Guillain-Barré Syndrome. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2016. []
36. Connor E.M., Sperling R.S., Gelber R., Kiselev P., Scott G., O’Sullivan M.J., VanDyke R., Bey M., Shearer W., Jacobson R.L., et al. Reduction of maternal-infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with zidovudine treatment. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 076 Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994;331:1173–1180. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199411033311801. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
37. Tricou V., Minh N.N., Van T.P., Lee S.J., Farrar J., Wills B., Tran H.T., Simmons C.P. A randomized controlled trial of chloroquine for the treatment of dengue in vietnamese adults. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010;4 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000785. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
38. Borges M.C., Castro L.A., da Fonseca B.A.L. Chloroquine use improves dengue-related symptoms. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2013;108:596–599. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02762013000500010. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
39. Helal G.K., Gad M.A., Abd-Ellah M.F., Eid M.S. Hydroxychloroquine augments early virological response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in genotype-4 chronic hepatitis C patients. J. Med. Virol. 2016;88:2170–2178. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24575. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
40. Barrows N.J., Campos R.K., Powell S.T., Prasanth K.R., Schott-Lerner G., Soto-Acosta R., Galarza-Muñoz G., McGrath E.L., Urrabaz-Garza R., Gao J., et al. A Screen of FDA-Approved Drugs for Inhibitors of Zika Virus Infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20:259–270. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.07.004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
41. Wolfe M.S., Cordero J.F. Safety of chloroquine in chemosuppression of malaria during pregnancy. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 1985;290:1466–1467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6480.1466. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
42. Parke A.L. Antimalarial drugs, systemic lupus erythematosus and pregnancy. J. Rheumatol. 1988;15:607–610. [PubMed] []
43. Madrid P.B., Chopra S., Manger I.D., Gilfillan L., Keepers T.R., Shurtleff A.C., Green C.E., Iyer L.V., Dilks H.H., Davey R.A., et al. A Systematic Screen of FDA-Approved Drugs for Inhibitors of Biological Threat Agents. PLoS ONE. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060579. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
44. Keyaerts E., Li S., Vijgen L., Rysman E., Verbeeck J., Van Ranst M., Maes P. Antiviral activity of chloroquine against human coronavirus OC43 infection in newborn mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009;53:3416–3421. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01509-08. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
45. Yan Y., Zou Z., Sun Y., Li X., Xu K.-F., Wei Y., Jin N., Jiang C. Anti-malaria drug chloroquine is highly effective in treating avian influenza A H5N1 virus infection in an animal model. Cell Res. 2013;23:300–302. doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.165. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
46. Titus E. Recent developments in the understanding of the pharmacokinetics and mechanism of action of chloroquine. Ther. Drug Monit. 1989;11:369–379. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198907000-00001. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
47. Mackenzie A.H. Dose refinements in long-term therapy of rheumatoid arthritis with antimalarials. Am. J. Med. 1983;75:40–45. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91269-X. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
48. Law I., Ilett K.F., Hackett L.P., Page-Sharp M., Baiwog F., Gomorrai S., Mueller I., Karunajeewa H.A., Davis T.M.E. Transfer of chloroquine and desethylchloroquine across the placenta and into milk in Melanesian mothers. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2008;65:674–679. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03111.x. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
49. Gonzalez-Dunia D., Cubitt B., de la Torre J.C. Mechanism of Borna disease virus entry into cells. J. Virol. 1998;72:783–788. [PMC free article] [PubMed] []
50. Ferreira D.F., Santo M.P., Rebello M.A., Rebello M.C. Weak bases affect late stages of Mayaro virus replication cycle in vertebrate cells. J. Med. Microbiol. 2000;49:313–318. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-49-4-313. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
51. Savarino A., Boelaert J.R., Cassone A., Majori G., Cauda R. Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: An old drug against today’s diseases? Lancet. 2003;3:722–727. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00806-5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
52. Smit J.M., Moesker B., Rodenhuis-Zybert I., Wilschut J. Flavivirus cell entry and membrane fusion. Viruses. 2011;3:160–171. doi: 10.3390/v3020160. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
53. Dohgu S., Ryerse J.S., Robinson S.M., Banks W.A. Human immunodeficiency virus-1 uses the mannose-6-phosphate receptor to cross the blood-brain barrier. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:1–12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039565. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
54. Suen W.W., Prow N.A., Hall R.A., Bielefeldt-Ohmann H. Mechanism of west nile virus neuroinvasion: A critical appraisal. Viruses. 2014;6:2796–2825. doi: 10.3390/v6072796. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
55. Qian X., Nguyen H.N., Song M.M., Hadiono C., Ogden S.C., Hammack C., Yao B., Hamersky G.R., Jacob F., Zhong C., et al. Brain-Region-Specific Organoids Using Mini-bioreactors for Modeling ZIKV Exposure. Cell. 2016;165:1238–1254. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.032. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
56. Savarino A., Shytaj I.L. Chloroquine and beyond: exploring anti-rheumatic drugs to reduce immune hyperactivation in HIV/AIDS. Retrovirology. 2015;12:51. doi: 10.1186/s12977-015-0178-0. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] []

Articles from Viruses are provided here courtesy of M

ultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)





https://www.researchgate.net/post/Chloroquine_effective_in_COVID-19_True_or_false


Asked 18th Mar, 2020

Is a combo of chloroquine and Zinc a cure for coronavirus?

Recent studies from Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, and Qingdao Municipal Hospital identified that Chloroquine phosphate, a drug used for the treatment of malaria, chikungunya fever, Zika virus, and HIV, is shown to be effective against COVID-19. Basically, Chloroquine phosphate increases the endosomal pH and interfere with terminal glycosylation due to which the virus cannot survive.
Several studies have reported that zinc has a broad-spectrum antiviral activity against a variety of viruses. Increased intracellular Zinc concentrations inhibit RNA-dependent RNA polymerases and other proteins essential for the completion of different phases of the virus life cycle. Further, zinc also helps to maintain robust immune responses by producing cytokine and by modulation of immune cell activity. Both the drugs are FDA approved and are readily available.
Please share your view
Other drugs
References

Most recent answer

9th May, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Steingrimur, I suggest you address your comments to the Physicians that are on the front lines right now saving lives.

Popular Answers (1)

28th Mar, 2020
Ankit Kumar Singh
Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar
Yes, zinc stops the coronavirus to replicate and multiply. For that zinc needs to be penetrated to cells. For this purpose, hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine can be used that has the potential to fight coronavirus. But these drugs have gastrointestinal effects.
8 Recommendations

All Answers (142)

18th Mar, 2020
Suhad Mohammed
University Of Kufa
Indirectly yes
23rd Mar, 2020
Kiran R
Bangalore University
According to the following sources, the National Medical Products Administration of China has approved Favilavir as the first anti-viral drug that can possibly treat COVID-19. Favilavir also works as an antiviral inhibiting viral RNA-depended RNA polymerase activity. Although there is no word from FDA.
23rd Mar, 2020
Kiran R
Bangalore University
UPDATE
In a major development, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) recommended hydroxychloroquine, less toxic chloroquine for a high-risk population.
Results from the in-vitro study by Liu et al., (2020) indicated that hydroxychloroquine can efficiently inhibit CoV-19 infection. Authors of the article (Correspondence to Cell Discovery) recommend that drug has a good potential to combat the disease.
In another attempt, after the clinical trials on 340 patients, Chinese medical authorities identified that favipiravir, a drug used to treat influenza appears to be effective for coronavirus.
Deleted profile
perhaps try quercetin, it is extremely low in toxicity :
A man in the USA has already died using choroquine as a COVID-19 treatment and his wife is in critical condition. It is unknown what dosage they consumed.
2 Recommendations
25th Mar, 2020
Kiran R
Bangalore University
Dear
Amy Johnson
, thanks for sharing your opinion. Till now I was not aware of this drug Quercetin. In a recent update, Hydroxychloroquine has been recommended by several authorities. The drug is 40 percent less toxic than parent Chloroquine. Apparently the man who died had taken the nonmedical form of chloroquine which is used to fight parasites in aquariums.
According to the following source, the FDA has approved off-label use for the hydroxychloroquine to help coronavirus patients.
Deleted profile
Kiran R a USA man and his wife just poisoned themselves this week experimenting with chloroquine. the man died and his wife is in critical condition. Also, I shared a scientific paper, not my opinion.
Deleted profile
there is no chemical difference in a "medical" or "nonmedical" form of a compound
28th Mar, 2020
Ankit Kumar Singh
Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar
Yes, zinc stops the coronavirus to replicate and multiply. For that zinc needs to be penetrated to cells. For this purpose, hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine can be used that has the potential to fight coronavirus. But these drugs have gastrointestinal effects.
8 Recommendations
28th Mar, 2020
Kiran R
Bangalore University
UPDATE
Remdesivir, a compound with a broad spectrum of antiviral activities has been found effective against Covid-19. Remdesivir is a nucleotide analog inhibitor of RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. Previously, Remdesivir has been effective against several RNA viruses, including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV.
The following review article details the possible mechanisms of chloroquine interference with the Covid-19 virus replication cycle.
2 Recommendations
1st Apr, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
Anit Kumar Singh: " Yes, zinc stops the coronavirus to replicate and multiply "
Well... ultimately, that is the effect. Intracellular Zinc interferes with coronavirus transcription, which results in the ability of the virus to replicate. [] However, being a ++ ion, extracellular zinc requires active transport to pass across the cell membrane. It so happens that chloroquine is a zinc ionophore, thus provides zinc++ with the transport mechanism. [] In this instance, chloroquine has no drug action. It is the zinc that is in play, and I find it concerning that so many news organizations (and governments) are failing to convey this fact..opting, instead, to portray chloroquine as having the key drug action. it does not...
8 Recommendations
2nd Apr, 2020
Łukasz Szarpak
Polish Society of Disaster Medicine
Zumla et al. indicated that remdesivir and chloroquine are highly effective in
the control of 2019-nCoV infection in vitro
2nd Apr, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
@lukasz szarpak can you please provide the exact article citing to which you are referring? I am curious to learn what the drug action of chloroquine is, in this cocktail...
3rd Apr, 2020
Kiran R
Bangalore University
UPDATE,
A study has been initiated on Preemptive Therapy for SARS-Coronavirus-2 and this study is open to anyone who lives in United States and meets the criteria. The study aims to determine if hydroxychloquine can be useful for SARS-Coronavirus-2 infection.
The proposed study uses a public health model with an estimated 3000 patients.
3rd Apr, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
Mika Turkia I am willing to discuss the possibility of co-authoring a review article. I think that critical mass, herein, is assuring we are rigorous in identifying as many legitimate (non-anecdotal) sources as possible. I have just breezed over (all that time allows) a recent (March 30th) article from Johns Hopkins, which reviews a great many options and posits potential directions...though there is no mention of zinc (whatsoever) nor do I recall mention of quercetin or selenite:
This article (and most others) are dismissive of "Traditional Chinese Medicine" approaches, as anecdotal. Unfortunately, if there are solid, peer-reviewed examinations of folk medicines, I do not know them. That might be another article...? If you wish to exchange contact information, in order to facilitate communication, let me know and we can take this conversation offline.
7th Apr, 2020
Victor Koman
The Agorist Institute
Amy Johnson
As long as the chloroquine phosphate (Aralen) isn't merely an ingredient in a sack of fish-tank cleaner! That's how an Arizona woman poisoned herself and her husband.
7th Apr, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
@Victor Koman... <sigh> unfortunately, it's at the expense of the lay public and peril to the Scientific Method and real science that US leadership ignore method, fact and process in favor of misinformation/disinformation, hyperbole, platitudes and stupidity.
8th Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Yes, I think so. See my Face Book group page, Nutrition and Cytology.
I have been studying zinc for many years.
9th Apr, 2020
Jorge Castaño
Otelo&Fabell
I am trying myself 200mg of hydroxychloroquine every 72 hours and 60 mg of zinc per day as an experimental prophylactic procedure. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04326725
9th Apr, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
Suzanne Adams, I am curious to learn of any peer-reviewed research you and/or your colleagues have produced on zinc?
Jorge Castaño, can you help me to understand why - when there have been ongoing trials (with some early, notable successes) in Asia and (I have been told by German colleagues) Germany, using a 500mg dose of chloroquine combined with 50mg of zinc, daily, for ten days. What was the rationale for changing the dosages and timing strategy? Is there a precedent for that approach to which you can refer me? Far too frequently, of late, I am learning of seemingly random drug/supplement strategies that don't have any apparent basis in scientific method or medical verity.
10th Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Hi Jonas,
I have a chapter on zinc in my book entitled, The Art of Cytology: An Illustrative Study Guide with Micronutrient Discussions. It was published in 2007 but the words still ring true, and I would only be piling on more references if I revised it. I also made a Facebook group page called "Nutrition and Cytology" where I have posted numerous PubMed articles on various micronutrient topics, especially zinc and folate. Presently we are trying to figure out just what is needed to stop the covid-19 virus from entering the cells. You are welcome to join this Facebook page and also I have a copy of my zinc chapter.
Are you working on the covid-19 virus?
Suzanne
10th Apr, 2020
Jorge Castaño
Otelo&Fabell
There are positive results for Hydroxychloroquine+Zinc+ Zithromax prescription in America. Check this video
Zithromax 500 mg, 1 pill a day for five days.
Hydroxychloroquine 200 mg, twice a day for five days.
Zinc 220 mg, per day for five days.
11th Apr, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
@Jorge Castaño per the FDA: "The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is warning the public that azithromycin (Zithromax or Zmax) can cause abnormal changes in the electrical activity of the heart that may lead to a potentially fatal irregular heart rhythm. Patients at particular risk for developing this condition include those with known risk factors such as existing QT interval prolongation, low blood levels of potassium or magnesium, a slower than normal heart rate, or use of certain drugs used to treat abnormal heart rhythms, or arrhythmias."
This makes use of the drug in treatment of coronavirus infections a poor idea, given the vast portion of global populations with both known/treated heart disease and undiagnosed heart disease. It's too risky a proposition, since the downside of using azithromycin is death. Whereas, zinc is considered a supplement, and safely taken over the counter at the dosage and for the timeframes recommended. And, whilst chloroquine is known to cause damage to the retina, when taken in high doses for many months to years, there is no known/reported toxicity during a ten day course (the current recommended dosage in combination with zinc is, once again, 500mg chloroquine and 50mg zinc, once per day, for ten days).
12th Apr, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
Curious that the article places second the obvious drug effect of zinc, an essential element for the human body, in favor of a hypothetical secondary effect of chloroquine, which is toxic to the retina. My suspicion...we are underestimating the possibility of using a different zinc ionophore, one that is non-toxic, in providing active transport to extracellular zinc. Chloroquine simply doesn't have a known drug action in this case. We don't have to speculate about zinc's action, as it's already documented that zinc interferes with coronavirus transcription.
1 Recommendation
14th Apr, 2020
Claude Pelletier
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
Is human ribosome hibernation by zinc depletion (missing Zinc-Finger in ribosome) giving a chance to mycobacteria/virus to overtake the ribosomes? https://www.pnas.org/content/115/32/8191
19th Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Yes I think missing zinc fingers are a problem in many disease conditions. They stabilize p53, the most common mutated gene in human cancer. The four zinc fingers in p53 keep this gene from mutating and causing cancer.
20th Apr, 2020
Wayne White
Nutrisol
A study by Chen-Chen Liou (for his doctoral thesis at Linacre College) showed that histidine (which forms a histidine/zinc complex) can cause a substantial increase in zinc uptake by red blood cells. (The thesis can be found at: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:176943c5-b0bc-45d7-abe1-3240f6710b54/download_file?safe_filename=602788992.pdf&file_format=application%2Fpdf&type_of_work=Thesis - sorry, I don't have experience with embedding links in this venue).
So my question is whether or not histidine (or another amino acid) used in combination with a zinc source (such as zinc sulfate) could enhance the effectiveness of zinc in treating COVID-19 infections. Presumably, amino acids would have low toxicity, and they are usually relatively inexpensive. As noted in a previous answer, Quercetin (which can also form a complex with zinc ions) is also being investigated as a means for enhancing the effectiveness of zinc in treating COVID-19.
1 Recommendation
20th Apr, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
@Wayne White I am trying to find a ready scientifically sound response for you. I can say without even checking that I have been discussing ionic zinc (Zn++) whilst zinc sulfate is a compound, which I cannot say is as readily available intra-cellularly. It could be a water soluble, in which case it won't make any difference and becomes ionic once ingested. However, the dosage would have to change. If the recommended dose of ionic zinc is 50mg per day, for instance, the dose for zinc sulfate might be 200 to 250mg, in order to result in a net dose of 50mg zinc.
Pretty busy of late (as a medical first responder) so not much time to research. Soon as I can I will update this.
20th Apr, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
Dmitry Kats
I just read your project, regarding niacin. Intriguing. Let's chat, at our mutual convenience. Send me a note when you can...
20th Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
22nd Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Kiran and Jonas! Here is a petition to get funding for a zinc and chloroquine treatment for plan for Covid-19:
1 Recommendation
22nd Apr, 2020
Kiran R
Bangalore University
Dear Suzanne Adams thanks for sharing.
22nd Apr, 2020
Wayne White
Nutrisol
Besides considering any contribution of the ionophore by itself in helping to fight the virus, there may be two other competing processes to consider in selecting the best ionophore to combine with the zinc: Zinc transport through the cell membrane (or even into the virus itself), and any need for the ionophore to release the Zn++ as free ions. Some of the better ionophores for getting the zinc into the cell may also bind the zinc such that the free Zn++ ions may not be available. This makes Docta Kats idea of using niacin particularly interesting because with the carboxylic acid being in the 3 position, the zinc would presumably not be as strongly bound as some of the stronger chelating agents (i.e. alpha amino acids, picolinic acid, etc.). Thus if the niacin can effectively transport the zinc through the cell membranes, it could be an excellent choice as an ionophore.
On a side note, presumably, taking a soluble zinc salt (zinc sulfate, etc) along with an ionophore would allow the complex to form right after dissolution (assuming they are in close proximity). Obviously having the two pre-mixed or even pre-complexed would help to ensure that the complex forms. There are some tests that indicate better absorption of the zinc when complexed with the ionophore, so if taken in separate tablets or capsules, it would seem to be best to take the zinc and the ionophore at the same time to maximize the opportunity for the complex to form.
Finally, to Jonas Moses and all other front-line medical personnel working to combat COVID-19, a heart-felt thank you for risking your health to help those who are sick and the world community in general.
1 Recommendation
22nd Apr, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
Suzanne Adams Thank you for the links! I continue to question the desirability of using chloroquine, knowing there are other, more benign zinc ionophore options. I also question the scientific evidence for use of chloroquine as a drug in COVID 19 treatment. I have not seen any compelling evidence that it has its own antiviral drug effect with this coronavirus.
Wayne White most kind, Sir. Also continuing to follow the niacin trail...certainly interesting.
22nd Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Jonas Moses, thanks for appreciating them.
Wayne White, can I share your paper on zinc transport through cell membranes with my group of mostly cytologists, pathologists, and other doctors on my Facebook group page, "Nutrition and Cytology"? We are talking about alternatives to chloroquine and how to get zinc into the cells to block the virus.
You are all welcome to join and help convince doctors of zinc's power in protecting cells from viruses, especially the coronaviruses. I am only a cytologist and it is hard for me to answer all of their questions and respond to their comments. They are trying to be open-minded. Micronutrient use is pretty foreign to them. I wish you would help me.
1 Recommendation
22nd Apr, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
Suzanne Adams regarding your comment: " Micronutrient use is pretty foreign to them. I wish you would help me." I highly recommend you speak with Dr. Manuel Toca, who is an international SME on (among other things) Nutrigenomics. He is a former clinical colleague of mine and regular collaborator on Precision Medicine, Medical Genetics/Genomics, Epigentics, Nutrigenomics and Proteomics... additionally, he is a residency-trained Internal Medicine physician, US Sport Medicine-certified... well, suffice it to say that he belongs in this conversation. If you agree, I will discuss making an introduction with him.
22nd Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
I would love it!
PS: There are doctors now posting on my site about their studies with zinc and covid-19 now! I hope you join too.
22nd Apr, 2020
Wayne White
Nutrisol
Suzanne Adams, regarding the paper, I included the URL for the download (sorry, I'm not familiar with how to do a hyperlink on this website). It seems to be available for public download. However, since it is someone else's doctoral thesis, you might want to get Chen-Chen Liou 's permission (assuming you can make contact). I wish you the best on getting the help you need in communicating with the broader medical community.
23rd Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Thank you so much. I'm glad I asked for permission because I thought it was your work but I'll try to contact the owner of the manuscript for permission to post it. At least I will read thoroughly through it and thank you so much for posting it here. Having many ways to get zinc into the cells, especially safely with natural substances that we consume each day, is so important for doctors to know at this time in particular.
28th Apr, 2020
Vladimir Chubanov
Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich
Regarding the comment: "We are talking about alternatives to chloroquine and how to get zinc into the cells to block the virus...
You may wish to look at our recent paper suggesting such mechanism:
TRPM7 is the central gatekeeper of intestinal mineral absorption essential for postnatal survival
February 2019 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(10)
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1810633116
28th Apr, 2020
Yahy Mohamed
Sana'a University
According to a study was done.Yes it may be used ,this study will be published soon.
28th Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
I have always liked the idea of using natural ionophores, like quercetin and other polyphenol flavonoids. Niacin and clioquinol look promising too. Just started reading about them.
Here's a new report that just came out today that I'd like to share with you as it discusses hydroxychloroquine, and also common blood pressure medications and how there is a need for a thorough study of them in relation to covid-19 cases and their complications.
PS: ACE inhibitors work to block zinc and are known to cause a deficiency.
28th Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Here is the new report I meant to send on hydroxychloroquine for covid-19.
1 Recommendation
28th Apr, 2020
Yahy Mohamed
Sana'a University
Suzanne Adams but what about the mechanism? Is it true?
29th Apr, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Treatment of army veterans with hydroxychloroquine +/- azithromycin shows no benefit and is possibly detrimental.
"In this study, we found no evidence that use of hydroxychloroquine, either with or without azithromycin, reduced the risk of mechanical ventilation in patients hospitalized with Covid-19. An association of increased overall mortality was identified in patients treated with hydroxychloroquine alone"
This off-label use of a malaria drug is looking to be a snake oil remedy.
29th Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
I was never into hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine myself because I'm into the natural ionophores that we can take in every day from our diet, or make use of as medicines. Several symptoms of covid-19 infection are consistent with zinc deficiency. I think some of the zinc depleting medications, in particular the ACE inhibitors, have resulted in pts. with too low of zinc in their extracellular matrix.  If zinc levels aren't checked, monitored, and brought up to optimal levels, I don't see how any ionophore can work to get the little zinc it finds into the cells.  My concern with using a powerful drug like chloroquine when zinc is low, is that it might take the little zinc it finds out of the bones and muscles where it needs to stay, leading to side effects. I have been talking to a great zinc researcher that has been researching zinc for many years. He has written numerous papers that have been published on zinc throughout the years, especially in relation to prostate cancer. I cited his work in my chapter on zinc in my book several times. His name is Leslie C. Costello, and he is now here on ResearchGate posting his new projects and papers. I would love for you to get connected with him because he really would be able to answer your questions about zinc. I think we could all benefit hearing from him to gain great insights regarding zinc compounds in medicine. There are already several being used now.
29th Apr, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Suzanne Adams . What dietary ionophores are absorbed by the intestines?
29th Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Here are some zinc ionophores described in published papers below:
PS: Natural ones are often polyphenols flavonoids found in fruits, such as quercetin, and herbs, such as epigallocatechin-gallate found in green tea.
*Zinc ionophore activity of quercetin and epigallocatechin-gallate: from Hepa 1-6 cells to a liposome model.
*Quercetin Zinc complex and bladder Ca
*Chemoprevention of Prostate Cancer by Natural Agents: Evidence from Molecular and Epidemiological Studies
*A Cancer-Selective Zinc Ionophore Inspired by the Natural Product Naamidine
*Chemical Synergy between Ionophore PBT2 and Zinc Reverses Antibiotic Resistance
*Clioquinol, pyrithione for cancer and degen neuro diseases
*Zinc pyrithione for skin cancer
*Developing drugs targeting transition metal homeostasis (ionophores and chelators)
1 Recommendation
29th Apr, 2020
Wayne White
Nutrisol
Treatment of army veterans with hydroxychloroquine +/- azithromycin shows no benefit and is possibly detrimental.
Others have reported that zinc must be given with the hydroxychloroquine in order for it to be effective. Specifically Dr. Anthony Cardillo in Los Angeles reported that without the zinc the treatment wasn't effective. It would appear that the hydroxychloroquine acts as an ionophore, which might help to keep the zinc from binding with proteins in the cells where it can't have an effect on the virus. I also wonder if the ionophore helps the zinc penetrate the virus itself. Anyway, it appears that the zinc is the active component here (rather than the hydroxychloroquine) and the ionophore may help it to be more effective.
29th Apr, 2020
Claude Pelletier
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
@Wayne White intracellular Zinc as "Zinc-Finger" could prevent Ribosome Hibernation and overtake from Virus.
1 Recommendation
29th Apr, 2020
Yahy Mohamed
Sana'a University
Wayne White please what is the mechanism of action between zinc and hydroxychloroquine? And the evidance of this mechanism?.
29th Apr, 2020
Wayne White
Nutrisol
what is the mechanism of action between zinc and hydroxychloroquine?
Hydroxychloroquine has a hydroxy group separated from the amine group by two carbon atoms. The nitrogen and the oxygen can thus complex with the Zn++ ion, forming a 5-atom chelate ring. It is likely that at least two hydroxychloroquine molecules can thus chelate a single Zn++ ion. Chelation of metal ions is a well studied subject with numerous references.
It has been theorized that complexing the zinc ion with some organic molecules improves the zinc transfer rate across cell membranes. There have been a number of studies indicating other ligands (such as histidine or other amino acids, which can also chelate the zinc ion) have improved uptake both across the intestinal wall and also by red blood cells (in vitro). Being more familiar with industrial chemistry than biochemistry, I am not as familiar with the transport of the zinc ions across membranes and with the mechanism(s) for zinc interfering with the replication of a virus within a cell, and I will defer to the experts in that area.
Since there have been several "anectodal" studies where combined hydroxychloroquine and zinc has apparently had a high rate of very positive outcomes (vs the study mentioned above with the slightly negative result for hydroxychloroquine alone) the relevant questions now would seem to be:
  • Can zinc taken as a medication (without the hydroxychloroquine) effectively fight the COVID-19 causing virus?
  • Is hydroxychloroquine combined with zinc a more effective treatment for COVID-19 than either zinc or hydroxychloroquine alone, and if so, is the combination a safe enough treatment?
  • Are there other organic molecules/zinc complexes that might improve the effectiveness of zinc in fighting the virus, and if so, what, would be safe and effective?
  • Is there any way to accelerate studies and/or clinical trials on these issues so that if one of these approaches does turn out be an effective treatment, it can be recognized and made available in time to save lives?
Since I am not in a position to effectively answer any of these questions, I will need to bow out and leave the discussion to others who are in a better position than myself.
2 Recommendations
29th Apr, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Hydroxychloroquine is a Zn++ chelator, but like almost all chelators it also binds other divalent transition metals like Cu ++.
~80% of Zn++ in the circulation is bound to serum albumin.
Since serum albumin is a major plasma protein (~30 mg/ml), it is unlikely that cells will ever come into contact with circulating HCQ-Zn++ complexes.
1 Recommendation
29th Apr, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Anecdotal accounts of HCQ/Zn++/azithromycin healing powers without having control subjects are as suspect as the anecdotal accounts of homeopathic nostrums.
Double blind clinical studies is the only way to determine whether this treatment has any merit or if it is snake oil.
29th Apr, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Suzanne Adams . The case for therapeutic applications of dietary flavonoids is not clear cut.
"Poor oral bioavailability has been a major limitation for the successful use of dietary flavonoids as cancer chemopreventive agents."
They are also not Zn++ specific chelators.
29th Apr, 2020
Wayne White
Nutrisol
Anecdotal accounts of HCQ/Zn++/azithromycin healing powers without having control subjects are as suspect as the anecdotal accounts of homeopathic nostrums. Double blind clinical studies is the only way to determine whether this treatment has any merit or if it is snake oil.
I strongly disagree. While I do agree that the clinical studies are necessary, if we didn't have anecdotal evidence as a start to base the clinical studies on, our medical practice would likely still be in the dark ages. In addition, when a significant number of small studies without the double blind methodology all have very strong positive results, I would think that would be enough evidence to do further clinical studies. By requiring the full blown clinical phase trial methodology before allowing that a treatment may be used you are in essentially saying that there is no hope for treating patients with COVID-19, because those studies often take years to complete. If there is a strong indication that a treatment is effective, thousands of people might be spared from death or life-long injuries from the illness. I agree that those clinical phase trial studies need to be completed in the long term, that does not mean that there can be no benefit from shorter term studies. For example treating a group of patients vs looking at a group of patients that received no treatment. If there is a large difference, even though the "control" group is less than ideal (i.e. received no placebo), and if there are a number of such small studies done that all indicate strong, positive results, either the placebo effect is unbelievably strong, or there is some real effect there. Then the longer term studies can be used to better quantify the results and determine long term safety aspects. I agree with others that these experimental treatments need to carefully monitored and documented by the physicians using them, and there should probably be consideration given to reserving the treatment to those where the risk of the illness outweighs the risk of the treatment. Use of the experimental treatment should probably not be considered as a preventive measure for the general public. What we need now is more solid interim data, and we need it quickly.
29th Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
There are some really good lecture videos on Covid-19 by a pulmonologist critical care physician who I've been following for a while now. There are about 60 of them at least now, and they are free as a public service.
This is #34 which explains how chloroquine works at the cellular and molecular level to get zinc through the cell membrane and inside the cell to stop the viral replication. It has good drawings made partly on the spot.
There are also a few other video lectures about zinc before and after this one to watch too:
The lectures are taught online at medcram.com
Here is a pubmed report on zinc and how it inhibits coronavirus replication:
29th Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Steingrimur, I read that too about zinc chelators as opposed to zinc ionophores. The ionophores don't bind as strongly to zinc, so they are more certain to release the zinc into the cells and not hold onto them instead.
29th Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Steingrimur,
*The natural zinc ionophore, quercetin, shows strength:
Here's a new report that delves deeply  into natural phytochems and ionophores that help zinc work:
 "There is increasing evidence from a myriad of laboratory, animal, epidemiologic studies and available clinical trials that specific dietary agents (namely Lycopene, Epigallocatechin gallate, Sulforaphane, Indole-3-Carbinol, Resveratrol, Quercetin, Curcumin & Piperine) and Zinc display the ability to inhibit signalling pathways which lead to prostate carcinogenesis. "
*And clioquinol, which is in the family of chloroquine, appears to be a safer zinc ionophore than chloroquine:
30th Apr, 2020
Victor Atanasov
Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski"
Does the classic anti-malarial Quinine work as a zinc ionophore and/or inhibitor of endosomal acidification (like the chloroquine)?
30th Apr, 2020
Claude Pelletier
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
Zinc (along with cupper and manganese) are 3 metals that help Superoxyde Dismutase Enzyme to work. Source: Dr. Seheult 17:15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aj2vB_VITXQ&feature=youtu.be
Endothelial Oxydative Stress could be the culprit here. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)
According to Dr. Seheult: "ACE2 is being downregulated and is no longer able to suppress Angiotensin induction of Reactive Oxygen Species", "SARS COV-2 destroys ACE2 which allows NADPH to ovewrproduce Superoxide molecules", "by comorbidity the superoxyde that maybe cause endothelial Damage"
1 Recommendation
30th Apr, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
I agree that anecdotal observations can lead to breakthroughs in medicine, like Jenners’ cowpox vaccinations to protect against smallpox and Marshalls’ notion that ulcers are caused by H. pylory.
Conversely, anecdotal observations can also lead to falsehoods and quackery that harm more than they help. Look at bloodletting, radium therapy and Trumps’ deranged musings on the curative potential of UV light and disinfectants.
The study I linked to above compared HCQ treatment to standard care of COVID19 infected veterans. It showed that HCQ treatment caused more fatalities than standard care.
Therefore, rushing into clinically untested cures can cause more deaths.
30th Apr, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Quinine, like HCQ, binds many transition metal ions.
Both are cell permeable and by passive diffusion disrupt the acidification of lysosomes. More ominously is that they also disrupt pH gradients of all cell organelles including mitochondria.
Whether they act as metal specific ionophores is still not clear. Cells are generally impermeable to charged compounds including metal complexes. Cell uptake of metals is mostly regulated by receptor mediated endocytosis or ion channels but not by passive diffusion.
30th Apr, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Bioavailability of orally administered medications depends on them staying intact in the harsh conditions present in the digestive system.
1) Low pH of the stomach (pH ~2.0) followed by rapid neutralization.
2) Detergent-like cholic acids in bile.
3) Redox actions of gut microbes.
4) Diffusion through the intestinal mucosal barrier.
5) Diffusion through intestinal epithelial cells.
6) Efficient binding to plasma carrier proteins (e.g serum albumin).
I seriously doubt that any non-covalent metal chelates can stay intact through these conditions.
30th Apr, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Yes I realize that about zinc ions. They need a carrier molecule to get inside the cell.
1 Recommendation
1st May, 2020
John-Paul Leonard
University of California, Berkeley
Re: anecdotal evidence vs. gold standard trials, there is another way. I invite you all to visit my project at http://fieldtrials.net . Small crossover trials by treating physicians could urgently validate (or refute) therapies like HCQ+high dose zinc. In fact, crossover trials are the recommended vehicle for bio-availability studies. Even single-case studies can be statistically significant. High-end clinical trials are never going to happen, certainly not soon enough to save lives and losses.
2 Recommendations
1st May, 2020
John-Paul Leonard
University of California, Berkeley
@Docta Kats, Agree it's really important to find an effective OTC ionophore. Not much comes up on a search of niacin as zinc ionophore. Niacin is a combination of nicotinic acid and nicotinamide (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK541036/ ) Are either of those substances zinc ionophores? Niacin seems to be a Ca++ ionophore and there is one article about a calcium ionophore increasing intracellular zinc "the so-called calcium ionophore A23187 is not specific for Ca2+ ions but also transports Zn2+ with high selectivity over Ca2+" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14716092 I'm also having a hard time finding your research on twitter or sound cloud, could you post it here, or a good link? Thank you
1 Recommendation
No one knows the truth, nor will researchers know they are afraid of getting it, until they do serious autopsies and experiment with medications. It has been too long and all of the government and researchers are turning a blind eye.
5th May, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
John-Paul, did you check the ones on my Facebook group that are already using it, like the ones from Eastern Virginia medical school?
5th May, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
John-Paul Leonard I would very much like to discourage you and your colleagues from using Chloroquine. This approach is dangerous and inappropriate, given that there are other, safer zinc ionophore alternatives.
1 Recommendation
6th May, 2020
Yahy Mohamed
Sana'a University
Suzanne Adams
The answer for your question.
6th May, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Whoever said I was the one that wanted chloroquine. I don't know the first thing about chloroquine except it was used for malaria.
That question was made by Kiran A., and it's still a good question.
My idea has always been zinc bound with an over-the-counter type ionophore like quercetin or another natural polyphenol flavonoid or similar substance.
Vitamin D and few other things are also really good like NAC.
1 Recommendation
7th May, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Kiran R,
7th May, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
Suzanne Adams There are abundant issues with this article, far too many to enumerate in a single comment and I simply do not have time to go into great detail, here, so will give an obvious instance:
" Supplementation of zinc is known to be clinically relatively safe if dosing ranges and upper limits of dosing are based on recommended dietary allowances [20] "
"...clinically relatively safe..?" Zinc is essential to more bodily functions than nearly any element in the periodic table. Without zinc in our diets, we would cease to exist. Thus, a ridiculous statement. Further, the statement is referenced "[20]" to an article that does not appear in any search. The direct link takes one to a dead link page. The authors do not appear to understand they are asserting gross exaggerations of facts about chloroquine and hydroxycholorine, which makes me wonder if they are somehow associated with certain drug manufacturers. I can find no unequivocal, peer-reviewed literature that "a pH increase in intracellular compartments might be one important inhibiting effect of CQ and probably of HCQ in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients..." If you follow the trail on this statement, reference [8], you can read multiple commentaries bashing that review article on the scientific merits, alone.
Once again, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are not the answer, and ought not be recommended or further studied. They are dangerous drugs, with severe downside, employed in patients for whose underlying diseases the nasty side effects of the drugs is the "lesser of two evils."
7th May, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
I'm just posting a new review that came in today. Doctors use drugs all the time with tremendous side effects. My idea is using zinc with natural ionophores like quercetin. What is your idea?
7th May, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
I am for zinc for CoVi, along with other micronutrients in short supply, and zinc fortification worldwide as well. I based my opinions on anything else after many studies are in. I believe in open-mindedness and that the decision on hydroxy is not in yet. I do believe that it would be much safer with zinc added. This cardiologist from Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit has a differing opinion on it is what I am saying and the studies are not in yet. I believe that I should have respect for his opinion as he is a doctor, and also specialized in cardiology. With love, Suzanne
Jonas, I believe I sent you my book chapter on zinc and that you know how strongly I believe in it, and how many years I've been following the studies on it. I believe in your concerns regarding the dangers of chloroquine. However, wouldn't every single drug be taken off the market if it had dangerous side effects. All one has to do is listen to the TV drug commercials and be horrified by the side effects of these drugs, especially the ones that suppress the immune system with side effects of cancer and death even, not to mention the inability to fight off infections.
7th May, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
7th May, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
Suzanne Adams A better question would be, "why are we barking up this tree, when we already know that there is serious downside to these drugs?" It is a time-waste and interfering with more appropriate efforts to identify the best drug treatments and vaccines possible to address this coronavirus. What is the point of spending all this money chasing after a non-cure we already know [from more than 50 years of data] can damage the eyes [resulting in blindness] and cause cardiac issues, potentially resulting in death? There is no upside to this...
1 Recommendation
7th May, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Here is an explanation for that question by this doctor that I just now heard:
7th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
This is more of a political issue than a scientific one. Some are desperate to believe a conman from New York.
Seriously, trump said that injections with disinfectants and blasting the body with UV light should be looked at as a treatment for the virus. Their devotion to trump reminds me of a cult.
7th May, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
Steingrimur Stefansson agreed. However, ResearchGate is supposed to be a bastion of scientific investigation, critical thinking and solid scientific analysis. It is not a place to air political fanaticism, hyperbole, fringe beliefs, et al. That is the bailiwick of social media...
7th May, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
Suzanne Adams Dr. Graves is not an epidemiologist, not a SME in infectious disease, no background in pharmacokinetics... she is a retired FP physician and well-known Conservative activist.. Small wonder she hypes the White House approach to this pandemic and parrots Mr. Trumps's assertion that chloroquine is a wonder drug. Look at who is interviewing her...a high profile right wing Conservative mouthpiece magazine, "The New American." Not CNN, ABC, CBS, not MSNBC, not Al Jezeerah, not BBC or British World Service, not NPR or any other respected, internationally acclaimed news organization. This isn't the NY Times, Washington Post, LA Times, Chicago Trib or WSJ...it's a tiny, right wing political rag.
Again, if there are any peer-reviewed, scientifically sound articles on the efficacy of chloroquine speaking to the drug's front line pharmacokinetic action regarding coronavirus, I cannot find it.
Furthmore, Dr. Graves apparently supports the work [research/] of the French doctor, Didier Raoult, whose recent article on Chloroquine use in treating COVID 19 is under scrutiny of retraction by Elsevier and Medscape: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/928336
...as bad science.
1 Recommendation
7th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Jonas Moses touting hydroxychloroquine as a virus cure is a fringe belief. I have been on RG for a long time, but I was dismayed when I saw some RG threads praising homeopathy! This sort of pseudo-science has to be confronted especially now when so many lives are at stake.
1 Recommendation
7th May, 2020
Jonas Moses
EnVision Eye Center - Metepec
Steingrimur Stefansson THANK you! Wholly in agreement.
7th May, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
I don't believe any of these MD's have any thing to do with homeopathy.
Ongoing Hydroxy zinc studies:
*Eastern VA Med School Covid-19 Protocol:
*WHIP COVID-19 Study:
William W. O’Neill, MD, medical director of the Center for Structural Heart Disease at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit and one of the organizers of the WHIP COVID-19 study, to learn more. William W. O’Neill, MD, can be reached at woneill1@hfhs.org.
His reference listed:
----------------------------
*IV Zinc Only Study:
 The trial is being led by Dr Joseph Ischia from Austin Health, along with Dr Oneel Patel from the Department of Surgery at the University of Melbourne:
Updated IV Zinc Only Report; Fast Tracked:
---------------------------
*Zinc and Hydroxy Study in NY:
Cardiologist Dr. Avni Thakore is the study’s principal investigator
-------------------------
1 Recommendation
7th May, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
8th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Suzanne Adams If you go to Clinicaltrials.gov you will find that there are no clinical trials underway or planned using IV zinc for COVID19 anywhere in the world.
8th May, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Steingrimur,
Here is Dr.Joseph Ischia's medical webpage. Contact information is available if you would like to talk to him directly about his zinc trial in Melbourne, Australia. He is a board certified surgical uro-oncologist who has done extensive research and work with zinc in his patients. He is part of Epworth UroRenal and Vascular Clinical Institute in Melbourne.
PS: the big reason why zinc is particularly important with coronaviruses is because it works directly at the Ace II receptor sites on the cells by stopping the viral spike protein from getting inside the cell and then using the DNA to replicate itself. Here is what I mean, described in detail in this article:
Also, here's what zinc did when it was added to AZT therapy for HIV/AIDS:
I could post so many more from PubMed but they are already posted on my Facebook group page "nutrition and cytology". You're welcome to join. There're now over 700 members and most of them are doctors from around the world.
8th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
"International Zinc Association (IZA) – industry association dedicated exclusively to the interests of zinc and its users – has been closely monitoring the situation and working actively finding potential treatment with zinc for COVID19.
It is obvious that this group is only interested in pushing zinc onto the medical community whether it helps or not. Maybe trying to get some of the money off this snakeoil "cure".
8th May, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
it is obvious that you are just pushing for a vaccine and know very little of what about zinc
8th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Suzanne Adams Are you an anti-vaxxer?
1 Recommendation
8th May, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
No but they're not very effective when you still have obesity, and zinc deficiency along with vitamin D deficiency.
8th May, 2020
John Mason
University College London
This website is a useful resource, and there are many recent articles on this very subject: http://www.orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/index.shtml
8th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
John Mason Non peer reviewed "science" articles are less useful than toilet paper. At least TP has a designed purpose. Science deniers will always be relegated to the garbage heap of history.
9th May, 2020
Suzanne Adams
American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Steingrimur, no I'm saying that zinc levels in people need to rise before any vaccine can be effective. How can antibodies be made when there's not enough of zinc to do so, especially in those who are on zinc depleting drugs like ACE inhibitors. Your insulting prejudicial statements are going to be reported. You're absolutely unprofessional in your behavior, and I'm not a Trumper.
9th May, 2020
Steingrimur Stefansson
Molecular Innovations Inc. Novi Michigan
Mika Turkia Anybody with a credit card can announce a clinical trial. When they have to justify statistics, cohort composition. mission statement , end-point evaluation, age dependent inclusivity, etc, these slugs just fade away.
Can you help by adding an answer?

Similar questions and discussions

Opinions on this SARS era research on quercetin as an anti-viral against SARS and COVID-19?
Question
7 answers
  • Deleted profile
over the counter nutritional supplement quercetin shown to have antiviral activity against SARS/coronavirus probably also COVID19 given their close relationship and infection mechanism, spike sequence, etc
Small Molecules Blocking the Entry of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus into Host Cells
Ling Yi, Zhengquan Li, Kehu Yuan, Xiuxia Qu, Jian Chen, Guangwen Wang, Hong Zhang, Hongpeng Luo, Lili Zhu, Pengfei Jiang, Lirong Chen, Yan Shen, Min Luo, Guoying Zuo, Jianhe Hu, Deliang Duan, Yuchun Nie, Xuanling Shi, Wei Wang, Yang Han, Taisheng Li, Yuqing Liu, Mingxiao Ding, Hongkui Deng, Xiaojie Xu
Antiviral activity of an analog of luteolin.Since quercetin, which is structurally related to luteolin, is an ingredient of antioxidant and antiallergy medicines that had been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA; the national drug code numbers of the medicines are 65448-3085, 65448-3005), we sought to determine whether quercetin could also antagonize SARS-CoV entry. Assays with the HIV-luc/SARS pseudotyped virus showed that quercetin also had antiviral activity against HIV-luc/SARS, with an EC50 of 83.4 μM (Fig. 3). The cytotoxicity of quercetin was very low, with a CC50 of 3.32 mM (data not shown). As an FDA-approved drug ingredient, quercetin offers great promise as a potential drug in the clinical treatment of SARS.
Chloroquine effective in COVID-19: True or false?
Discussion
214 replies
  • Prashant WankhadePrashant Wankhade
Chloroquine effective in COVID-19: True or false?
Dr. Prashant R. Wankhade
Hypothesis:
It has been proposed that these viruses are internalized by receptor mediated endocytosis and delivered to lysosomes. At acidic pH, the membrane surrounding the virus fuses with the membrane of lysosome, allowing the nucleic acid of virus to cross lysosomal membrane and enter the cytoplasm where the virus replicates. Infection of tissue culture cells by these viruses can be prevented by chloroquine, an agent that blocks function of lysosome. Chloroquine is a weak base that diffuses in lysosome and raises the pH of lysosome causing impairment of function of lysosomal enzymes. Viruses that requires acidic pH to fuse with cell membrane can no longer do so in the presence of chloroquine and the cells are protected from infection.
Facts:
1. Aim of the virus is to reach the destination where it can replicate. This destination is cytoplasm for RNA viruses and nucleus for DNA viruses.
2. Normally viruses enter the cell by direct membrane fusion or endocytosis-based mechanism.
3. Exact mechanism of COVID-19 entry in cell isn’t clear (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92477/). If its entry is via membrane fusion then there is no need for COVID-19 to cross Lysosome as the virus particles will get direct entry in cytoplasm. Even if the entry is endocytosis-based then also it is less likely to cross Lysosome.
4. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are known to alter Lysosomal function. But there are discrepancies in the literature about whether or not chloroquine raises the lysosomal pH (Autophagy. 2018; 14(8): 1435–1455). Some studies do not support this fact whereas others state that the change in pH may not last longer than 1 to 4 hours. So, the fact that Chloroquine will cause alteration in viral cell cycle is not clear.
5. Viruses like polio virus and Hepatitis-C virus enters the cell via endocytosis; in that case Chloroquine would have helped in controlling these infections also, but no guidelines recommend its use.
6. This hypothesis related to Chloroquine and Viral infection is not new. One of the articles published in 2003 advocates its possible role in treatment of HIV infection but none of the guidelines has yet recommended (Lancet Infect Dis. 2003 Nov;3(11):722-7).
The same article advocates its possible role in clinical management of Corona related Middle East Respiratory syndrome (MERS) and Corona related severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) but no further data available on its definite role.
7. RNA viruses including COVID-19 can replicate in cytoplasm and need not require entry in the nucleus like DNA viruses. Chloroquine doesn’t have any effect on cytosolic pH to alter the replication of virus and in fact that will be hazardous for cell itself.
8. Thus, these facts put question mark on above hypothesis.
9. And finally, in this era of evidence-based medicine we need concrete evidence to support the hypothesis; as it’s not necessary for every hypothesis to reflect vis a vis in clinical applicability.
Why did Fauci not recommend Chloroquine as a treatment for Covid19
Discussion
131 replies
  • Stanley LahamStanley Laham
Why did Dr. Fauci wait 2 months to recommend an expensive patented nucleic acid analog produced by an American Company when he had proof that Chloroquine was effective as both an antiviral and immune regulator to prevent the lethal effect of Covid19??
PUBLISHED IN NATURE, 04 FEBRUARY 2020
Cell Reseach
“Chloroquine, a widely-used anti-malarial and autoimmune disease drug, has recently been reported as a potential broad-spectrum antiviral drug.8,9 Chloroquine is known to block virus infection by increasing endosomal pH required for virus/cell fusion, as well as interfering with the glycosylation of cellular receptors of SARS-CoV.10 Our time-of-addition assay demonstrated that chloroquine functioned at both entry, and at post-entry stages of the 2019-nCoV infection in Vero E6 cells (Fig. 1c, d). Besides its antiviral activity, chloroquine has an immune-modulating activity, which may synergistically enhance its antiviral effect in vivo. Chloroquine is widely distributed in the whole body, including lung, after oral administration. The EC90 value of chloroquine against the 2019-nCoV in Vero E6 cells was 6.90 μM, which can be clinically achievable as demonstrated in the plasma of rheumatoid arthritis patients who received 500 mg administration.11 Chloroquine is a cheap and a safe drug that has been used for more than 70 years and, therefore, it is potentially clinically applicable against the 2019-nCoV.”

Related Publications

Article
The article provides a review of foreign literature for 2020 on existing methods of drug treatment of coronavirus disease COVID-19. To date, in the treatment of COVID-19 in different countries, a little more than 10 drugs are used. The largest number of studies on the testing of these drugs is carried out by scientists from China, the USA, and Euro...
Article
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus is spreading rapidly, and scientists are endeavoring to discover drugs for its efficacious treatment in China. Chloroquine phosphate, an old drug for treatment of malaria, is shown to have apparent efficacy and acceptable safety against COVID-19 associated pneumonia in multicenter clinical trials conduc...
Article
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is advancing globally, and pharmaceutical prophylaxis is one solution. Here, we propose repositioning chloroquine (CQ) as prophylaxis against COVID-19. CQ blocks viral attachment and entry to host cells and demonstrates efficacy against a variety of viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrom...

 


https://www.nature.com/articles/ncb2678.pdf?origin=ppub






Virus entry: What has pH got to do with it? Ari Helenius

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8175575/


. After several years of working on membrane proteins using the Semliki Forest virus (SFV) as a model, I decided in 1976 to focus my research on the mechanisms by which animal viruses such as SFV enter and infect their host cells. I had just moved from Finland with the lab of Kai Simons to the newly founded European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) in Heidelberg, Germany. I was eager to tackle a challenging problem — and one that did not require work with detergents. Relying almost exclusively on electron microscopy, previous work on animal virus entry had left the field divided between proponents of direct virus penetration through the plasma membrane of the host cell and those who favoured penetration into the cytosol from intracellular vacuoles after endocytosis. Together with Jürgen Kartenbeck, a colleague in the German Cancer Research Center (where we were temporarily housed), and Erik Fries, a Swedish post-doctoral fellow, we studied what happened when SFV was added to cells in tissue culture. Using electron microscopy, we visualized virus particles binding to the cell surface, becoming internalized by coated vesicles and accumulating in intracellular vacuoles. Biochemical assays with radioactive virus particles demonstrated that endocytosis was rapid and efficient. We confirmed that infection was prevented by weak bases such as ammonium chloride and chloroquine, and showed that this involved inhibition of virus entry. However, these compounds did not inhibit the endocytic uptake of SFV. To our disappointment, we had no evidence of fusion between host and virus membranes.


For almost two years, the virus entry pathway and mechanism of host penetration continued to elude us. However, in the spring of 1978, I had the chance to participate in a Dahlem Conference in Berlin called ‘Transport of Macromolecules in Cellular Systems’. It was an opportune time for a meeting on this topic: pathways of vesicle transport were being discovered, receptor-mediated trafficking processes were beginning to be described, and the important role of clathrin-coated vesicles was finally properly appreciated. All the leaders in the membrane cell biology field were present. During a coffee break, I asked William Sly, a pioneer in the trafficking of mannose-6-phosphate receptors, whether he knew what weak bases such as ammonium chloride and chloroquine do to cells. He directed me to a paper by Brian Poole showing that these agents raise the pH in lysosomes. When Erik Fries and I were discussing the conference in the laboratory the following week, he made a remark that changed everything. He simply asked, “Could pH have something to do with it?” Suddenly, all the pieces of the puzzle fell into a coherent picture. We realized that the acidic pH in lysosomes and other endocytic vacuoles was not only required to optimize the degradative action of acid hydrolases, but could also serve as a ‘cue’ for viruses to activate their penetration mechanism. Exposure to low pH ‘told’ the viruses that they had entered a cell and reached the endocytic pathway, and that it was time to activate the penetration machinery. We speculated that low pH induced a change in the spike glycoproteins present on the virus envelope that allowed fusion of the viral envelope from the lumenal side with the limiting membrane of the vacuole. As a result, the viral capsid was released into the cytosol without itself having to cross the hydrophobic barriers formed by a membrane.


Over the following months, we validated all the predictions of our pH hypothesis. For example, we could demonstrate a membrane fusion reaction in  vitro by simply mixing liposomes and SFV, and briefly dropping the pH to 6 or below. Moreover, when we added acidic medium to cells, we could ‘fool’ surface-bound viruses into fusing with the plasma membrane; the entry block caused by weak bases was bypassed and the cells became infected. Joined by Judy White, Mark Marsh and Karl Matlin as postdoctoral fellows in the lab, we extended the acid-activation concept to other viruses. For the influenza A virus, the threshold was a pH-unit lower, and exposure to low pH induced a dramatic, irreversible conformational change in the haemagglutinin glycoprotein. We realized, moreover, that the acidic organelles where viruses were activated were not lysosomes, but pre-lysosomal vacuoles. We called these vacuoles ‘endosomes’, a name that soon became the general term used for these complicated and dynamic compartments. Today, we know that most viruses (whether enveloped or not) use endocytic entry mechanisms. For the majority, a drop in pH serves as a trigger for host penetration. Some bacterial toxins also rely on low pH as a cue. Moreover, it is well known that differences in the pH between compartments regulate directional transport of cargo in the endocytic and secretory pathways. Endosomes have attained a visibility and recognition that those of us working on them in the early 1980s could hardly have dreamt of. I have had other turning points along my scientific path, but none of them with quite as many significant consequences as the one involving endosomal entry of SFV and the role of pH. COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTS The author declares no competing financial interests




. 1994 Feb;76(2):657-62.
 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.76.2.657.

Dependence of surfactant function on extracellular pH: mechanisms and modifications

Affiliations 

Abstract

We investigated alterations in pH on the surface properties of natural lung surfactant and the calf lung surfactant extract (CLSE), suspended in 10 mM N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid, using a pulsating bubble surfactometer. Increasing the pH value of the medium to > 7.4 decreased the ability of CLSE, but not of natural lung surfactant mixtures (2 mg phospholipid/ml), to achieve a low minimum surface tension during dynamic compression and enhanced their sensitivity to albumin inactivation. These detrimental effects on surface tension were reversed by addition of surfactant protein A (SP-A; 3% by weight) or by increasing the lipid concentration to 4 mg/ml. SP-A-induced lipid aggregation at pH 10 was not different than at pH 7.4. Alkalinization impaired the ability of CLSE to restore normal lung mechanics in excised surfactant-deficient rats lungs. These results indicate that cooperation between SP-A and the hydrophobic surfactant proteins has an important role in achieving low minimum surface tension at pH > or = 7.6.

Similar articles

Cited by 8 articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances


Ionophore

Description

Description

An ionophore is a chemical species that reversibly binds ions. Many ionophores are lipid-soluble entities that transport ions across the cell membrane. Ionophores catalyze ion transport across hydrophobic membranes, such as liquid polymeric membranes or lipid bilayers found in the living cells or synthetic vesicles. Wikipedia

Mar 31, 2021 — 1.1 Zinc ionophores could inhibit SARS-CoV-2 ... The Covid-19 pandemic is a disease caused by the novel RNA coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2. Mild ...


 



 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.