Saturday, January 16, 2021

Artemisinin - the wonder plant that helped a Chinese scientist win a Nobel Prize

Artemisinin is another one of those drugs that has great testimonials about its miraculous abilities to prevent disease (on the cheap), also happens to be a DE-WORMER... like Ivermectin... and Fenbendazole.  Hydroxychloroquine is also an anti-parasitic.  

Hmmm...  Big Pharma rakes in billions of dollars every year, from people who have Cancer and Covid. Don't suppose that could have anything to do with the Medical Industry's vehement insistence that there is NO WAY something cheap, and readily available to everyone, could actually keep people from having to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on Cancer and Covid treatments?

Check out these two reviews for Artemisinin, from a brand that's cheap and readily available on Amazon. You can search reviews for keywords like Covid, to see these reviews (below) on Amazon, for yourself.  Then, do a search for the word "cancer" in the artemisinin reviews for the brand below. You will see that there are OVER 50 people who are taking it for cancer. Will post some of those reviews below the reviews that mention the word Covid. 

Then, read the history behind Artemisinin... it's pretty interesting.  

You can also grow your own Artemisinin. Better get those plants and seeds now, before it's outlawed like cannabis! : D  You can find Artemisinin plants on ebay, like this one. And you can also buy Artemisinin seeds from Amazon.




Zazzee Artemisinin 100 mg per Capsule120 Vegan Capsules


Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2022
I read about Artemisinin in a Covid support group. I am 67 and was hospitalized for Omicron Pneumonia for seven days. When I came home I had covid brain fog for weeks. I lost my taste and smell and the worst of it I had no energy. I followed directions on bottle and took one pill a day for a week. The second day my brain fog had lifted and continues to get better day by day. My smell is starting to come back and so is my taste. After 1 week I had more energy. I now take four pills a day, 2 in am 2 pm. I will do so until I fully recover. This is working!
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 3, 2022
I was experiencing covid long haul symptoms for two months despite taking the usual supplements - C D and zinc. This was recommended and I began taking as directed. Within one week I had consistent improvement, at two weeks I'm 90% free of the most troublesome symptoms. Artemisinin will remain part of my maintenance supplements.


And here are some reviews that mention the word "cancer." Just pasting a few, but there are OVER 50 reviews that mention cancer (for this brand, at least), and most of them seem to be positive. 

Hmmmm...


Reviewed in the United States on July 10, 2020
I ordered this brand of Artemesinin after reading about this sweet Annie herb and the many benefits. I am a breast cancer survivor, went through traditional mastectomy surgery and reconstruction. It wasn’t an easy road as I ended up going through multiple surgeries in a short period of time. I wish I had the knowledge back then that I have today. This was several years ago and at the time I was not very familiar with herbs, only with juicing and how diet plays a huge role in your overall health.
So I got this for my husband’s and my health as a maintenance and to cleanse our body of unwanted parasites, biofilm, yeast, candida, etc.
So I started on empty stomach, with 2 in the morning and 2 at night with 18mg iron In AM only, also take black pepper for better absorption. Then on 2nd week rotation went up to 3 in AM and 3 in PM ( so important to take with iron, do your research, Dr. Henry Lai at Washington State University) iron is loved by cancer cells and when the cancer eats the iron the Artemesinin comes in and kills the bad cells. When this happens your body will have die off symptoms. I have definitely had an extremely tired with brain fog feeling, cold symptoms too. This is how I know it is working. We are on 2nd week of 5 days on 4 days off rotation. Rotation is important as your body gets used to herb and when you stop periodically and reboot the herb works stronger somehow. Will be using this long term along with many other natural supplements and herbs.
I did Buy 2 other brands, 1 from allergy research group and 1 from Longlifenutri. I wanted to get a few other brands to try as well. This brand is potent so I am impressed.
I wholeheartedly believe a person can heal and regenerate their body from within, no matter what sickness ails you, through raw fruits and veggies, detoxification and fasting. This is what I have learned and I have done tons of research over the years. I chose to no longer eat meat as well. Herbs are an added bonus but a person must choose to change their diet as well to become healthy. The Sad American Diet is causing so much havoc on people’s health. You can see it everywhere around you. My husband refuses to change his diet so it takes a lot of willpower to take care of yourself while being tempted with the unhealthy food around you. I did eventually conquer this hurdle, lol.

I hope this helps someone who wants to get started on this amazing plant extract which is a gift from God
FYI: Please do your research on doses and intervals, I have read so many reviews and most all reviews have varied dosing.
The most important thing I learned from Dr Lai is to take with Iron.
May the Blessings be
584 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2019
My dog has cancer tumours in her neck which are pressing on major nerves to her back legs. So she cannot
walk - other than that her health is good. Using Artemisinin along with Artemix and Butyrex to treat tumours.
so far it's working and tumours have shrunk about 50%. She now can move her back legs a little - hopeful
she will walk again - maybe depending on damage to nerves..
Update - Copper (brown dog in pic) can now hold her back legs in a normal position bent at the hip, and tumour
in neck is shrinking (not fast enough but it's cancer). Still cannot stand or walk but back legs and left front have
some nerve control - she can move them, but just cannot stand up. Pleased with Artemisinin so far
Customer image
233 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2018
Purchased this based on the positive reviews and research on canine cancer. Our 9 yr old pitbull was diagnosed with oral fibrosarcoma and was given a couple of weeks to 2 months to live. Our vet recommended surgery but that comes with removal of a good portion of his jaw and not a great prospect for extending his life (maybe a 6 months). Out of respect for his dignity and quality of life we declined the surgical approach and have immersed ourselves into a holistic approach toward battling his disease. We met with a holistic vet and our boy has been on many supplements and chinese herbs along with a high protein raw diet since late October. I can't be sure of its success, but since we started him on Artemisinin his tumor has decreased in size. He is active, eating well and generally acting like a 3 yr old dog. We are hopeful this, along with the other supplements and herbs, is helping to boost his immune system and naturally attack the cancer cells. So far so good. I will continue to post updates (good or bad).

Update 4/29/19 - its been 6 months and I'm happy to say the tumor is completely gone. Again, I am not here to say that Artemisinin is the exact reason, but coupled with other supplements and raw diet our dog is cancer free.
222 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on August 14, 2018
I'm on my second bottle of Artemisinin. Not really sure what's happening with the cancer. The tumor is still there, no shrinkage yet. Regardless I really appreciate the way you do business. I received my Artemisinin with a couple of days, maybe three at the most. I was touched with your concern on the dosage and your following up is excellent. If it's working you will continue to get my business, if it doesn't, well, you won't. The clock for me is ticking and I can hear it. It's really strange to feel good and know the end could be so near. Thank you I'll probably buy another bottle in a few weeks.
243 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on June 6, 2019
Ii don't have a review as far as how the products is working. I started taking artemisinin after watching the docu series titiled "The Truth about cancer." They recommended 5 herbs to promote immune health which is the first way
of fighting cancer possibilities. Artemiisinin is one of the five.
169 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2018
One capsule 4x per week and I am still cancer free. Wahoo!!
162 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2018
I'm using this product along as part of a cancer treatment protocol for one of our dogs with thyroid adenocarcinoma non-movable, inoperable tumor. Since adding the ART, the tumor has stabilized. I've been using this specific product for several months now and my dog is happy , active, has a good appetite, weight, and in general is doing quite well.
121 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 29, 2019
I did quite a bit of research online for natural remedies for prostate cancer. Artemisinin was one product I found that had good results. I've been taking this product for only a month (along with an iron supplement that aids it's effectiveness) and I must say my symptoms have dramatically decreased. Very pleased.
70 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 20, 2018
It is a very promising product (originally invented against malaria and with an unexpected effect of shrinking malignant tumors) that can boost your immune system starting with a very low dosage of 100 mg and gradually increasing it to 400 mg per day. It is supposed to kill cancer cells but leave healthy cells intact. I am taking it preventatively. There are studies claiming that this supplement is added to conventional anticancer treatments like chemotherapy showing an noticeable improvement. As a stand-alone substance it could be very effective, but I've heard only anecdotal stories, not verified by myself in the framework of rigorous studies. While 400 mg need not be an upper bound for the dosage to reach its full potency, increasing it above 400 may pose unknown risks. Again there are no sufficient statistics about the effect of this supplement for humans at this point, but there are very impressive results of experiments rendered on animals, with no reported side effects.
72 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on February 11, 2018
I am giving these to my dog which has cancer. She is a fighter and seems to be stable at the moment. After 2 weeks of use she is liking her food again and the cancer has not grown more. Fingers crossed.
96 people found this helpful
Report abuse


You can also read more about Artemisin (aka Sweet Wormwood) by clicking HERE).

You can read about how drugs like Hydroxychloroquine work (by raising the pH of your endosomes) by clicking HERE.

You can see a few books that show the power of natural antivirals (check out the Amazon reviews), by CLICKING HERE.


You can read about Tu Youyou's discovery of Artemisinin, in the article below. Note how she got the idea that artemisinin would be helpful, because she'd read in an ancient Chinese medicinal book (around 400 BC), that soaking artemisinin in water (not boiling it) had beneficial effects.

https://fortune.com/2015/10/07/nobel-prizes-2015-project-523-chinese-medicine-malaria/

The secret Chinese operation that conquered malaria — and won a Nobel

(FOCUS)SWEDEN-NOBEL PRIZE-CHINA-TU YOUYOU (CN)
BEIJING, Oct. 5, 2015-- Undated file photo shows Tu Youyou, right front, a pharmacologist with the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, working with professor Lou Zhicen to study the traditional Chinese medicine, in 1950s. China's Tu Youyou, Irish-born William Campbell, and Japan's Satoshi Omura jointly won the 2015 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine, the Nobel Assembly at Sweden's Karolinska Institute announced on Monday. Tu won half of the prize for her discoveries concerning a novel therapy against malaria. (Xinhua via Getty Images)PHOTOGRAPH BY XINHUA NEWS AGENCY/GETTY IMAGES

At the height of the Cultural Revolution, Project 523 — a covert operation launched by the Chinese government and headed by a young Chinese medical researcher by the name of Tu Youyou — discovered what has been the most powerful and effective antimalarial drug therapy to date.

Known in Chinese as qinghaosu and derived from the sweet wormwood (Artemisia annua L.), artemisinin was only one of several hundred substances Tu and her team of researchers culled from Chinese drugs and folk remedies and systematically tested in their search for a treatment to chloroquine-resistant malaria.

How Tu and her team discovered artemisinin tells us much about the continual Chinese effort to negotiate between traditional/modern and indigenous/foreign. 


 

Indeed, contrary to popular assumptions that Maoist China was summarily against science and scientists, the Communist party-state needed the scientific elite for certain political and practical purposes.

Medicine, particularly when it also involved foreign relations, was one such area. In this case, it was the war in Vietnam and the scourge of malaria that led to the organization of Project 523.

A request from Vietnam and a military answer

As fighting escalated between American and Vietnamese forces throughout the 1960s, malaria became the number one affliction compromising Vietnamese soldier health. The increasing number of chloroquine-resistant malaria cases in the civilian population further heightened North Vietnamese concern.

In 1964, the North Vietnamese government approached Chinese leader Mao Tse Tung and asked for Chinese assistance in combating malaria. Mao responded, “Solving your problem is the same as solving our own.”

From the beginning, Project 523, which was classified as a top-secret state mission, was under the direction of military authorities. Although civilian agencies were invited to collaborate in May 1967, military supervision highlighted the urgent nature of the research and protected it from adverse political winds.

The original three-year plan produced by the People’s Liberation Army Research Institute aimed to “integrate far and near, integrate Chinese and Western medicines, take Chinese drugs as its priority, emphasize innovation, unify plans, divide labor to work together.”

The medical mission

Project 523 had three goals: the identification of new drug treatments for fighting chloroquine-resistant malaria, the development of long-term preventative measures against chloroquine-resistant malaria, and the development of mosquito repellents.

To achieve these ends, research on Chinese drugs and acupuncture was integral.

The decision to investigate Chinese drugs was not without precedent. Back in 1926, Chen Kehui and Carl Schmidt of the Peking Union Medical College published their original paper on ephedrine, derived from Chinese herb mahuang. It ignited a research fire in which more than 500 scientific papers on ephedrine (for relief for asthma) appeared around the world by 1929.

In the 1940s, state interest in the Chinese drug changshan and its antimalarial properties led to the establishment of a state-funded research institute and experimental farm in Sichuan province.

Project 523’s embrace of Chinese materia medica — the traditional body of knowledge about substances’ healing properties — is a more recent example of the efforts to “scientize” Chinese medicine through selective appropriation and detailed investigation.

Biomedical interest in Chinese drugs was not in itself new. But the institutional climate within which Project 523 investigators worked was different from earlier antimalarial research efforts. The Vietnam War had exacerbated an epidemiological crisis to which Maoist China responded with nationalist fervor by turning to its institutions of traditional Chinese medicine.

In the 1960s, such institutions were a mixing ground of specialists, many of whom possessed more than a passing familiarity with Chinese medicine and biomedicine. This ensured that qinghao research proceeded within a climate in which scientists, “who themselves had learnt the ways of appreciating traditional knowledge, worked side by side with historians of traditional medicine, who had textual learning.”

Tu Youyou’s story

Tu Youyou’s research fits within this Maoist story of medical systematization and standardization.

Born in 1930, she was a medical student during the 1950s, when state efforts to make Chinese medicine scientific through the research and expertise of biomedical researchers were especially acute. She rose to the head of a malaria research group at the Beijing Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine in 1969.

The group was composed of phytochemical researchers who studied the chemical compounds that occur naturally in plants and pharmacological researchers who focused on the science of drugs. They began with a list of over 2,000 Chinese herbal preparations, of which 640 preparations were found to have possible antimalarial activities. They worked steadily and obtained more than 380 extracts from some 200 Chinese herbs, which they then evaluated against a mouse model of malaria.

Of the 380-plus extracts they had obtained, a qinghao (Artemisia annua L.) extract appeared promising, but inconsistently so. Faced with varying results, Tu and her team returned to the existing materia medica literature and reexamined each instance in which qinghao appeared in a traditional recipe.

Tu was drawn to one particular reference made by Ge Hong 葛洪 (284-363) in his fourth-century BC text, Emergency Prescriptions One Keeps Up One’s Sleeve. Ge Hong instructed: “Take a bunch of qing hao and two sheng [2 x 0.2 liter] of water for soaking it, wring it out to obtain the juice, and ingest it in its entirety.”

In what can be characterized as her eureka moment, Tu had the idea that “the heating involved in the conventional extraction step we had used might have destroyed the active components, and that extraction at a lower temperature might be necessary to preserve antimalarial activity.” Her hunch proved correct: Once they switched to a lower-temperature procedure, Tu and her team obtained much better and more consistent antimalarial activity with qinghao. By 1971, they had obtained a nontoxic and neutral extract that was called qinghaosu or artemisinin. It was 100% effective against malarial parasites in animal models.

Tu’s research has drawn accolades from the international scientific community, while also igniting a debate in the Chinese language media about the celebration of individual inventors over collective group efforts.

This too, perhaps, may be part of the legacy of Maoist mass science, which demanded research that served practical needs and engaged the masses. Scientific achievement, while important, was not the be-all, end-all of scientific work. During the Cultural Revolution, it mattered that science proceed along revolutionary lines. It mattered that scientific advances resulted from collective endeavor and drew from popular sources. Does it still?

Jia-Chen Fu is an assistant professor of Chinese at Emory University. This article originally appeared on The Conversation.

Qinghao
Qing Hao (Artemisia Annua) is a Chinese herb traditionally used as an anti-fever medicine. The use of this herb against fever was first documented in a medical treatise called '52 ailments' (五十二病方), which discovered in 1973 in the tomb from 168 BCE during the Han Dynasty.
Tea Season: Spring


https://www.fic.nih.gov/News/GlobalHealthMatters/september-october-2015/Pages/china-artemisinin-discovery.aspx


COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation.

COVID-19 public health info from US CDC  |  COVID-19 research info from the US NIH  |  COVID-19 resources for global health researchers


Chinese researchers discovered effectiveness of artemisinin against malaria

September / October 2015 | Volume 14, Issue 5

Close up of green, leafy Qinghao plant, Artemisia annua L
Photo by Jorge Ferreira,
via Wikimedia Commons

Artemisia annua L.

by Shana Potash

Today's best treatments for severe malaria are based on the potent drug, artemisinin. A treasure from China's medicine chest, it was rediscovered by Chinese scientists who transformed a centuries-old herbal remedy into a new class of drugs that have helped hundreds of millions of malaria sufferers around the world.

The story begins in the 1960s, during the Vietnam War and China's Cultural Revolution under Communist Party Chairman Mao Zedong. Malaria was rebounding in Asia as parasites that cause the mosquito-borne disease were becoming resistant to the available medicines. North Vietnam, in jungle warfare with the U.S., asked China for help developing new antimalarials for its troops. China launched a secret program investigating both known chemicals and traditional Chinese medicines. The chemical route quickly delivered new treatments to the battlefield. But scientists studying traditional medicines ultimately produced the powerful botanical artemisinin, several derivatives, and other drugs that can be combined with them.

Artemisinin is derived from the common plant, Qinghao, the Chinese name for Artemisia annua L., also known as sweet wormwood. It had been used in China for more than 2,000 years. The earliest record, from 168 B.C., was written on a piece of silk unearthed from a tomb and recommended the herb as a hemorrhoid therapy. A fourth century manuscript noted it as a malaria treatment and advised readers to take a handful of Qinghao, soak in 2 liters of water, strain the liquid and drink.

Throughout the 1970s, teams of Chinese scientists moved Qinghao from plant to drug. Early work produced a crude extract that was 100 percent effective against malaria in mice. Later, scientists isolated the extract's active component, and named it Qinghaosu, known in the West as artemisinin. They determined it had a chemical structure that was different from the existing antimalarials - which was important in solving the problem of resistance - and then tested it in clinical trials. China first used artemisinin-based drugs on the battlefield in 1979.

China did not disseminate information about artemisinin to the West during the Cultural Revolution. But when that period ended, news began to emerge and scientists in other countries, including the U.S., undertook their own studies. Western drug companies also became very interested.

Research inside and outside of China demonstrated that fast-acting artemisinin, combined with a longer-lasting partner drug, delivers the necessary one-two punch to clear parasites from the body. Today, artemisinin-based combination therapies are the WHO-recommended best available treatments for most patients with malaria, particularly in areas of parasite resistance.

More Information

Related publications:

Related Fogarty news and resources:

To view Adobe PDF files, download current, free accessible plug-ins from Adobe's website .


https://malariaworld.org/blog/viet-c%C3%B4ng-artemisia-annua-arteannuin-b-and-artemisinin

The Viet-Công, Artemisia annua, arteannuin B and artemisinin

December 30, 2016 - 22:05 -- Pierre Lutgen

Artemisia annua came under the spotlight during the Vietnam War. Viêt-Cong who operated in swamps and rain forests lost more soldiers by mosquito bites than by American bullets. Ho Chi Min turned to China for help. Researchers at the Chinese Institute of Material Medicine had found a region of China that reported no malaria cases, and when they investigated, they discovered that its people drank a decoction of Artemisia annua at the first symptoms of malaria. And actually, wild Artemisia has been used for millenniums in several regions of China and is still used to treat fevers and malaria. It was easy to acquire tons of this dried herb for Viêt-Cong. Taken as an infusion it worked wonders. The Americans, faithful to their less efficient pills, never knew what was going on.

         CJ Puotinen, Artemisinin, malaria and cancer, NEHA Internat, Winter 2003

Already in 1967, confronted with a strong recrudescence of malaria in the Southern provinces the Chinese authorities launched a nationwide program involving several hundred Chinese scientists. A part of this project, called “Program 523” endeavored to explore the traditional Chinese herbal medicine. More than 1000 samples of different herbs have been studied by the modern methods and isolation of the active principles is monitored with antimalarial screening in animal models. Many active principles had been isolated, for example yingzhaosu, from the traditional antimalarial medicine Dichroa febrifuga and Arbotrys uncinatus. It appears thus that these activities had started several years before the Vietnam war and the request for help by the Vietcong. And that the scientific activities took place in a nationwide program and not hidden somewhere in basements.

         Xiao-Tian Liang, We-Shuo Fang, Medical Chemistry of Bioactive Natural Products. Edited by Chinese Academy of Medicinal Sciences Beijing. Translation Wiley Interscience 2006

Studies with extracts from Artemisia annua started only in 1972 and this may be under the influence of some informations which came from Europe. Let’s not forget that Artemisia annua is growing wild on most European coastal river banks: Elbe, Rhine, Po, Rhone, Danube. Serbians presented their research results on Artemisia annua in February 1972 at an international conference in India. The reference to this work is quoted in the book Chinese Materia Medica, CRC Press, New York 1993 by You-Ping Zhu.

          D. Jeremić, A. Jokić, A. Behbud and M. Stefanović, New Type of Sesquiterpene Lactones Isolated From Artemisia Annua L. – Ozonide of Dihydro Arteannuin”, 8th International Symposium on The Chemistry of Natural Products, New Delhi, 1972, C-54, 221

One year later it was published in a well known peer reviewed journal Tetrahedron Letters

          D.Jeremić, A. Jokić, A. Behbud, M. Stefanović, A new type of sesquiterpene lactone isolated from Artemisia annua L., Tedrahedron Letters 1973 Vol 14- Iss 32, 3039-3042

The molecule was further described in 1974

          Uskoković MR, Williams TH, Blount JF. The structure and absolute configuration of arteannuin B. Helvetica chimica acta 57:3 1974 Apr 27 pg 600-2 and  Helv Chim Acta, 1974, 27;57, 602-15.

In the early 1970 the Swiss at the ETH Zürich were working on arteannuin B and published their results.. They hardly could have contacts with the Chinese and the administration of Artemisia annua infusions to Vietcong soldiers.

          DG Leppard, M Rey, AS Dreiding, R Grieb. The structure of arteannuin B and its hydrolysis product. Helv Chim Acta, 1974, 27;57, 602-15.

All this may explain why the Chinese started their Artemisia annua work with arteannuin B. Principal administrator of the project was Zhang Jianfang and it involved research teams in Hainan, Yunnan, Shandong, Beijing.

          Mao-Tian Liang, Wei-Shuo Fang, editors, Medical Chemistry of Bioactive Natural Products, Wiley-Interscience, 2006 New Jersey

The first trials with arteannuin B (qinghaosu II) were started in Hainan in October 1973 by doctor Li Chuangjie. A total of eight cases were studied, three with vivax and five with falciparum malaria. In both infections, the temperature normalization took 30 hours and parasitemia was cleared in 65 hours. But during follow-up parasites reappeared after a few days or weeks. Two patients did not respond and were considered treatment failures. To a large extent it is logical that the work in Yugoslavia and in China started with arteannuin B because the Artemisia species available were both of the type rich in artannuin B and poor in are artemisinin. Especially the Artemisia annua from the Beijing province.

         Youyou Tu . The discovery of artemisinin (qinghaosu) and gifts from Chinese medicine. Nature Medicine. 2011, 17, 1217–1220 doi:10.1038/nm.2471

By the end of 1972, the Beijing Institute of Chinese Materia Medica had identified and separated out several active constituents, one of which had an antimalarial effect and was named qinghaosu II. In 1973 preclinical animal toxicology testing was done at. Arteannuin B (qinghaosu II) showed cardiac toxicity in some animals. This explains why progress slowed in the years 1973. Finally arteannuin B was tested on three researchers and showed no apparent toxicity. Leaders therefore agreed to start clinical trials with arteannuin B. A clinical trial with thirty vivax malaria patients was run in the Shandong province and compared favourably with chloroquine. At the same time Zhan Eryi and Luo Zeyuan at the Yunnan Institute of Materia Medica improved the extraction methods and isolated white crystals with good antimalarial properties. This was called qinghaosu or artemisinin.. In January 1974, the head office organized a meeting of all district office leaders of Project 523. In May 1974, a clinical trial with artemisinin was completed with 26 vivax malaria cases. In most cases, no parasites were detectable in the blood 48 hours after drug administration. But the recurrence rates were high, in 4 out of 5 patients. Similar results were obtained in November 1974 by Li Guaqiao’s team for 18 falciparum malaria cases. At the end of February 1975, the national head office called for another meeting of all province leaders at Beiwei Road Hotel in Beijing ant it was decided that all research units should concentrate their efforts on artemisinin.

        Zhang Jianfang editor. A detailed Chronological Record of Project 523 and the Discovery and Development of QingHaosu (Artemisinin), Translation Keith and Muoi Arnold 2006, ISBN: 978-1-62212-164-9

        FH Jansen; Z Yin. 2002. Who Discovered Artemisinin? ISBN 90-807479-1-2. 25

One of the first peer reviewed papers of the Chinese team with the name of Tu Youyou and relating the discovery of artemisinin was published in 1979 by a team of Chinese scientists. Tu Youyou was not the main author but co-author.

        Liu JM, Ni MY, Fan JF, Tu YY, Wu ZH, Wu YL, Chou WS (1979) Structure and reaction of Arteannuin. Acta Chim Sin 37:129–143

Another paper was published at the same date without names.

        Qinghaosu Antimalaria Coordinating Research Group: Antimalaria Studies on Qinghaosu, Chinese Medical Journal. 1979, 92.12

At the same date the Ministry of Health nominated 6 institutions for the Discovery of Qinghaosu Award:

-          Academy of Chinese Traditional Medicine

-          Shandong Institute of Traditional Medicine

-          Yunnan Institute of Materia Medica

-          Institute of Biophysics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

-          Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemsistry

-          Guangzhou College of Traditional Medicine

Apparently, Tu Youyou is not the person who first discovered the antimalarial action of the extract, and not the first person who isolated the antimalarial Qinghaosu either, and these parts of work were not done under her instruction. Isolation of the active ingredient, inhibition of parasites in mice and primary clinical trials were carried out by three institutions respectively. Artemisinin was in fact discovered in 1972 from the leaves of Artemisia annua by Zhenxsin Wei There were critical voices in China after Tu Youyou won the Nobel prize. “I feel happiness and sorrow” said Liu Changhua, a professor of history.” I am happy that the drug has saved lives, but if this is the path Chinese medicine has to take in the future I am sad. Western drug companies examine traditional pharmacopeia around the world looking for new drugs. If this is the path we must go down, I think it is a disrespect of our cultural heritage. Artemisia has been in continuous use for centuries to fight malaria and other fevers”. Dr. Nicholas J. White, a prominent Oxford malaria researcher, said it was “not fair to credit this discovery to one individual”. During all these years the research on Artemisia annua extracts continued and other molecules were studied. Deoxoqinghaosu was synthesized from arteannuic acid and it was found more effective against K173 strain of Plasmodium berghei than the natural compound qinghaosu.

         B Ye; Y-L Wu; G-F Li; X-Q Jiao, Antimalarial activity of deoxoqinghasosu, Acta Pharm. Sin., 1991

There was also some hope that other Artemisia plants might contain molecules more efficient than arteannuin B or artemisinin. This is not a surprise because Chinese scientist Shengua (1095) and Li Shisten (1593) had found that Artemisia apiacea which does not contain any artemisinin had better antimalaria properties than Artemisia annua. A large variety of Artemisia plants was studied in these years by the Chinese: Artemisia eriopoda. Artemisia argyi, Artemisia anomala, Artemisia japonica, Artemisia apiacea, Artemisia gmelini,

         Yin Jianping, Tu Youyou, Chemical constituents of woolystalk wormwood (Artemisia eriopoda).  Zhongcaoyao 1989, 149-50 ISSN 0253-2670

         Gu Yuncheng, Tu Youyou, Chemical constituents of Japanese wormwood (Artemisa japonica), Zhongcaoyao, 1993, 24(3) CODEN : CTYAD8

         Wu Chongming, Tu Youyou, Isolation and identification of the lipophilic constituents from Artemisia argyi,  Zhongcaoyao, Tongbao 1985 10(1) 31-2, ISSN 0254-0029

         Xiao YQ, Tu Youyou, Identification of the lipohilic constituents of Artemisia anomala. Yao Xue XUE Bao, 1984, 19, 909-913

         Wu C, Tu Youyou, Studies on the constituents of Artemisia apiacea Hance, Chin Trad Herbal Drugs 1985, 6. 2-3.

         Wu C, Tu Youyou, Studies on the constituents of Artemisia gmelini. Chin Bull Bot 1985 3, 34-7

This is not a surprise because Chinese scientist Shengua (1095) and Li Shisten (1593) had found that Artemisia apiacea which does not contain any artemisinin had better antimalarial properties than Artemisia annua. All these studies of the team around Tu Youyou reflect some lack of confidence in artemisinin and Artemisia annua. It looks like searching for a needle in a haystack.

The continuing failure rates with monotherapy of arteannuin B and artemisinin prompted some trials with Artemisia annua extracts administered in capsules. The result was encouraging. The cure rate for Plasmodium berghei and Plasmodium vivax infections was 100%. This formulation was found to be better than chloroquine in fever subsidence and disappearance of malarial symptoms, while the recrudescence rate was still high, the latter could be inhibited by increasing therapeutic course or daily dosing time.

          Wan YD, Zang QZ , Wang JS Studies on the antimalarial action of gelatin capsule of Artemisia annua. Chinese Journal of Parasitology & Parasitic Diseases 1992, 10(4):290-294


Note how the rates of malaria in Vietnam have declined. It is stated in the study, below, that artemisinin helped with that decline.

You can read about Vietnam's low covid infection rate HERE. And you can read about how countries that use drugs like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine just *happen* to have very low Covid infection rates, by CLICKING HERE.

https://malariajournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12936-018-2372-8

The decline of malaria in Vietnam, 1991–2014

Abstract

Background

Despite the well-documented clinical efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) against malaria, the population-level effects of ACT have not been studied thoroughly until recently. An ideal case study for these population-level effects can be found in Vietnam’s gradual adoption of artemisinin in the 1990s.

Methods and results

Analysis of Vietnam’s national annual malaria reports (1991–2014) revealed that a 10% increase in artemisinin procurement corresponded to a 32.8% (95% CI 27.7–37.5%) decline in estimated malaria cases. There was no consistent national or regional effect of vector control on malaria. The association between urbanization and malaria was generally negative and sometimes statistically significant.

Conclusions

The decline of malaria in Vietnam can largely be attributed to the adoption of artemisinin-based case management. Recent analyses from Africa showed that insecticide-treated nets had the greatest effect on lowering malaria prevalence, suggesting that the success of interventions is region-specific. Continuing malaria elimination efforts should focus on both vector control and increased access to ACT.

Background

Over the past 15 years, scale-up in key tools to prevent and treat malaria has contributed to a dramatic reduction in transmission worldwide [1]. Principal among these tools have been insecticide-treated nets, indoor residual insecticide spraying, and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT)—the most effective anti-malarial therapy currently available for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum. In 2005, the World Health Organization began recommending ACT as first-line therapy for uncomplicated P. falciparum [2], although treatment with artemisinin-containing anti-malarials had already begun in areas confronted with resistance to chloroquine, sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine, and mefloquine [3]. Early clinical studies on artemisinin derivatives in the 1990s [4,5,6,7,8] and larger trials of ACT in the 2000s [9,10,11,12,13] demonstrated high clinical efficacy and a rapid killing rate, which would later make ACT the recommended first-line therapy for national malaria control programmes worldwide.

Beyond its well-established clinical efficacy, artemisinin may have population-level benefits in malaria control due to its moderate effect of reducing post-treatment carriage of gametocytes [14,15,16,17]—the sexual stage of malaria transmitted from human peripheral blood to Anopheles mosquitoes. Treatment of P. falciparum with an artemisinin-containing anti-malarial results in rapid killing of parasite asexual stages (99% daily kill rate [18, 19]) and, when combined with a partner drug, results in undetectable parasitaemia by microscopy after 3 days of treatment [8, 20]. Low parasite densities in the blood generally indicate that patients are less likely to transmit gametocytes to mosquitoes [21, 22]. However, the long-term population-level effects of ACT case management on parasite transmission are only now beginning to be documented through retrospective analyses [1, 23, 24], prospective studies [25,26,27,28], meta-analyses [29], and mathematical modelling [30,31,32]. The fact that ACT is typically introduced as a component of comprehensive malaria control efforts makes it challenging to isolate the effectiveness of ACT from that of other concurrently introduced control strategies, such as indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs).

An excellent case study for the long-term effects of artemisinin use in malaria case management is found in Vietnam. Following an epidemic of chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum in the late 1980s, Vietnam implemented a new national malaria control programme into which artemisinin-based case management was introduced; vector control practices were expanded and health capacity was strengthened. The incidence of malaria in Vietnam subsequently declined [33, 34]. Data on incidence, anti-malarial use, vector control effort, and various health-systems metrics were recorded in annual reports from Vietnam’s National Institutes for Malariology, Parasitology, and Entomology (NIMPE). An analysis of these data for the provinces in the southern part of the country from 1991 to 2010 showed that the strongest association with reduced malaria incidence was the proportion of stocked or ordered anti-malarial drugs that were artemisinin derivatives [24]. The present study extends the work by Peak et al. [24] by adding data from national-level reports collected including Vietnam’s central and northern provinces, and adding newer annual data from 2011 to 2014. In addition, this study introduces a measure of estimated malaria cases for Vietnam, using the detection and diagnostic capabilities in Vietnam during this time period. The findings of this study support the robustness of the association between adoption of artemisinin-containing anti-malarials for case management of P. falciparum and declining malaria incidence.

Methods

Data collection

The data used in this analysis were obtained from the Institutes for Malariology, Parasitology, and Entomology (IMPE) located in Ho Chi Minh City and the National Institutes for Malariology, Parasitology, and Entomology (NIMPE) in Hanoi. Data structure and cleaning have been described previously [24]. Briefly, NIMPE is responsible for defining guidelines, training staff, supporting local and provincial malaria posts and clinics, purchasing and distributing anti-malarial drugs, distributing insecticide-treated nets, identifying malaria transmission hot-spots, spraying insecticide in homes, and other control and response efforts [35]. Data from NIMPE/IMPE annual reports from 1991 to 2014 were collected in hard copy for all 58 provinces and 5 municipalities in Vietnam. In order to account for changes in provincial borders over the study time period, some provinces/municipalities were combined for analysis (see Additional file 1).

Malaria case data and case estimation

Data collected on malaria cases include provincial-level counts of cases, severe cases, and deaths. Malaria case numbers were available as either the number of clinically suspected malaria cases, y, or the number of suspected cases confirmed by microscopy, x, where x is a subset of y and both may include cases of P. falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria. However, for the y−x cases that remained unconfirmed, the reports do not indicate whether these cases tested negative by microscopy or if they were simply untested. The distinction between cases that tested negative and untested cases could be made if either the positive predictive value, q, of clinical diagnosis or the fraction of clinically suspected cases that undergo blood-slide diagnosis, fBSD, were known. If fBSD is known, then the total number of suspected cases that undergo microscopy, y⋅fBSD, can be used to calculate the positive predictive value, q, where q has a maximum value of one:

q=min(1,xy⋅fBSD)

Likewise, if the positive predictive value is known, then the fraction of suspected cases that underwent blood-slide confirmation can be calculated, unless q=1, in which case all clinically suspected malaria cases are truly malaria. If the rate of blood-slide confirmation, fBSD, is known, then the true number of malaria cases (falciparum and vivax combined) can be estimated as:

x+y⋅q⋅(1−fBSD)

which is equal to xfBSD when q≤1. Since independent estimates of q or fBSD cannot be obtained, fBSD was assumed to increase linearly in each province, with an independent slope for each province, during the years 1991–2014. This assumption is consistent with NIMPE annual reports, which show an increase in health system capacity and microscopy during this period. The linear increase in fBSD was chosen to minimize the variance in the year-to-year positive predictive value, as it is likely that clinicians’ ability to correctly diagnose a malaria case did not change significantly during this time. This assumption is supported by the opinions of IMPE/NIMPE staff. However, the relative prevalence of other febrile diseases is likely to affect the positive predictive value of malaria clinical diagnosis, depending on the level of similarity between the symptoms of these diseases and malaria symptoms.

Predictor data

Provincial-level annual data on the following potential predictors of provincial malaria case counts in Vietnam from 1991 to 2014 were identified and collected: (1) the proportion of treatment courses for P. falciparum containing artemisinin (see Additional file 2), (2) the proportion of the population protected by vector control measures (IRS or ITNs), (3) the proportion of the population living in urban areas (Government Statistics Office, Vietnam), (4) the discretionary budget per capita for the malaria control programme, and (5) staff trained per 100-persons.

Data on vector control measures contained in the annual reports were used to calculate the proportion of the population protected by vector control measures, as has been done in previous work [24]. These data include the total number of people protected by insecticide-treated bed nets and indoor residual spraying, reported as the sum of these two measures. ITN coverage is defined by NIMPE as the proportion of individuals who share an ITN with a maximum of three other household members [36]. Missing data on vector control measures were imputed by linear interpolation.

The reports also contained data on two measures of health system capacity: the discretionary budget and the training of health care workers. Budgetary data, broken down into sub-budget allocations for the local malaria control programme, and data on staff trained to support the malaria control programme, were both available in the reports by province and year. The discretionary budget per capita, which excludes the allocated budget for purchasing anti-malarial drugs, insecticides, and subsidies for ITNs and IRS, were used as measures of health system capacity after adjusting for historic inflation in the VND. The number of staff trained per capita was also used as a measure of health system capacity. Data for these two measures of health system capacity were only available for the years 1997–2014. Due to the high degree of missingness in measures of health system capacity, no imputations were conducted.

Data on the number of individuals living in urban areas were available by province for all years after 1994 from the General Statistics Office of Vietnam and are available online at the GSO website [37]. These data were used to calculate the proportion of the population in each province living in urban areas. Total population data was also available for all years after 1993 from the General Statistics Office of Vietnam. Missing population data were imputed linearly.

Statistical analysis

Poisson-regression models were fit to provincial-level malaria case data from 1991 to 2014, using three different model outcomes: (1) clinically-diagnosed malaria cases (‘suspected’ cases), (2) blood-smear confirmed cases (‘confirmed’ cases), and (3) cases estimated by minimizing the year-to-year variation in the positive predictive value of clinical diagnosis, as described above (‘estimated’ cases). All case measures include cases of falciparum and vivax malaria. Models included a province-specific fixed effect and the log of the population as an offset term. Lagged variables were not used as the time stratification in the data is too coarse (see Peak et al. [24]). Models were fit using generalized estimating equations (GEE), appropriate for correlated time-series data, with a log-link function, an independent correlation structure, and a robust covariance matrix estimator [38]. Spearman’s rank correlation tests were conducted to investigate temporal trends in the data. Models were fit to data from all 51 provinces in Vietnam for the 24 years from 1991 to 2014. Additionally, provincial-level data were stratified into northern, central, and southern regions and models were separately fit in order to explore regional trends. Due to missingness in the health system capacity variables, a set of models was fit to data from 1997 to 2014 using all five covariates as predictors (i.e., ‘five-covariate models’) and another set of models was fit to data from 1991 to 2014 using only three covariates (i.e., ‘three-covariate models’), which excluded the two measures of health system capacity—discretionary budget and staff trainings. All analysis was conducted in R, using the geepack package for fitting generalized estimating equations [39].

Results

Changes in malaria transmission

All measures of malaria incidence in Vietnam declined significantly between 1991 and 2014, with the majority of the decline occurring in the 1990s (Fig. 1). Suspected malaria cases in Vietnam declined from 1,290,250 cases in 1992 to 27,868 cases in 2014, corresponding to a 98.3% reduction in incidence. The confirmed case incidence decreased by 94.9% over this time period, from 224,923 cases in 1992 to 14,941 cases in 2014. Severe malaria cases declined from 24,022 cases in 1992 to 65 cases in 2014 and malaria fatalities declined from 2,702 deaths in 1992 to nine deaths in 2014. Similarly, estimated malaria cases declined 586,172 to 17,939 over this time. The declining trend in incidence between 1991 and 2014 was consistent across all provinces in Vietnam (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

Incidence of suspected, confirmed, and estimated cases of malaria per 1000 person-years by region from 1991 to 2014 on a log-transformed scale where labels correspond to raw (unlogged) values. In 2014, there were 473 confirmed cases in the northern region, 12,006 confirmed cases in the central region, and 2,462 cases in the southern region

Fig. 2
figure2

Incidence of suspected, confirmed, and estimated cases of malaria, by province (1992–2014). Provinces are arranged approximately by decreasing latitude (north to south) from top to bottom, and left to right. The y-axis is log-transformed, but the labels correspond to raw (unlogged) values and the “0.0” label on the y-axis corresponds to true zero

Malaria burden in Vietnam, 2014

In 2014, malaria transmission was highest in Gia Lai province located in central Vietnam where an estimated 4,386 cases occurred. Only 22 provinces, most in central Vietnam, reported more than 50 confirmed malaria cases in 2014 (Table 1). Incidence varied greatly between northern provinces and was generally low in the southern provinces (Fig. 3a). Mapping the positive predictive value of clinical malaria diagnosis (q) in 2014 revealed that q tended to be much greater in the south than in the north (Fig. 3b), attributable to northern provinces having high numbers of suspected cases while reporting very few slide-confirmed cases. From 2010 to 2014, the average positive predictive values ranged from 0.10% in Hai Phong located in the northern region to 99.2% in Binh Thuan located in the southern region. Excluding the northern provinces and an outlier in Ba Ria-Vung Tau, the average positive predictive value ranged from 31.4% in Hau Giang/Can Tho/Soc Trang to 99.2% in Binh Thuan province; this is the expected range for the positive predictive value of malaria clinical diagnosis according to senior IMPE/NIMPE staff.

Table 1 Malaria cases in 2014, by province
Fig. 3
figure3

a Incidence of malaria in Vietnam, 2014. Incidence is calculated per 1000 person-years using the estimated number of cases. b Average positive predictive value, q, by province for the years 2010–2014

Malaria control measures between 1991 and 2014

The percentage of treatment courses ordered for P. falciparum malaria that contained artemisinin increased significantly (Spearman ρ) from 12.1% in 1992 to 92.9% in 2014 across Vietnam and relatively uniformly for nearly all provinces (Fig. 4). The proportion of the population living in urban areas increased from 21.2% in 1995 to 33.1% in 2014. Again, this trend was similar across provinces and statistically significant almost everywhere. Unlike urbanization and the adoption of artemisinin, vector control measures did not show clear temporal trends when looking across provinces. Nationwide, the proportion of the population protected by vector control measures increased year-to-year from 1992 to 1997 (8.0% in 1992, 16.6% in 1996, 18.1% in 1997, 18.0% in 1998) and dropped to 9.7% in 2012 and 4.1% in 2014. Most provinces showed no temporal trend for vector control patterns.

Fig. 4
figure4

Changes in covariates between 1991 and 2014 for northern, central, and southern provinces

Effects of covariates on malaria incidence

In the analysis using all 51 provinces, after controlling for the proportion of the population living in urban areas and the proportion of the population protected by vector control, the proportion of treatments for P. falciparum that contained artemisinin was significantly (p < 0.001) and inversely associated with all three measures of malaria incidence (Fig. 5). A 10% increase in the proportion of treatments containing artemisinin was associated with a 32.8% (95% CI 27.7–37.5%) reduction in the incidence of estimated cases, a 29.4% (95% CI 24.9–33.5%) reduction in the incidence of confirmed cases, and a 29.0% (95% CI 24.7–33.1%) reduction in the incidence of suspected cases. The proportion of the population living in urban areas was significantly and inversely associated with suspected (p < 0.001) and estimated (p < 0.05) cases, but not with confirmed cases. The proportion of the population protected by vector control measures was not significantly associated with any of the three measures of malaria incidence in the nationwide analysis.

Fig. 5
figure5

Percent change in malaria incidence associated with a 10% increase in the proportion of treatments for P. falciparum containing artemisinin (top row), proportion of the population living in urban areas (middle row), and proportion of the population protected by vector control measures (bottom row), by region and nationwide, as predicted by models using these three covariates only. The circle shows the mean effect size, the solid line shows the 95% confidence interval, and the dotted lines shows the 99.9% confidence interval. Outcome variable used in model is indicated by color. For clarity, the x-axis has been limited to range from – 90 to 90%

Additionally controlling for changes in health system capacity using staff trainings and the discretionary budget similarly revealed that the proportion of treatments for P. falciparum containing artemisinin was significantly (p < 0.001) inversely associated with incidence, as measured by suspected, confirmed, and estimated cases (Fig. 6). Again, no significant associations were found between the proportion of the population protected by vector control and any of the three measures of malaria incidence. The proportion of the population living in urban areas was significantly inversely associated with suspected cases (p = 0.004), but was not significantly associated with estimated or confirmed cases. The discretionary budget was found to be positively but weakly associated with the number of suspected cases, with a 10% budget increase corresponding to a 1.35% (95% CI 0.09–2.6%) increase in the number of suspected cases (p = 0.035). Staff trainings per 100-persons was not found to be significantly associated with any incidence measure.

Fig. 6
figure6

As in Fig. 5, with the addition of covariates measuring health system capacity

Regional variation

The proportion of purchased P. falciparum treatments that contained artemisinin was found to be significantly (p < 0.001) inversely associated with all three measures of malaria incidence in all three regions (northern, central, southern) of Vietnam, both with (Fig. 5) and without (Fig. 6) the inclusion of the health system capacity variables. A possible inverse association between the proportion of the population living in urban areas and malaria incidence can be seen for the central provinces, although it is only significant when looking at suspected cases. The relationship between urbanization and malaria in the northern provinces is difficult to assess as the inferred associations were not robust across models and covariates. There was no evidence of a relationship between urbanization and malaria in the southern provinces.

Although the proportion of the population protected by vector control measures was not found to be significantly associated with malaria incidence when all provinces where analysed together, a few significant associations were identified when the analysis was stratified by region. In the three-covariate models, the proportion protected by vector control measures was significantly and inversely associated with all three measures of malaria incidence in the northern provinces (p < 0.01). However, in the five-covariate models, this association only remained significant for incidence measured by suspected cases and the directionality of the effect was reversed. For the southern and central provinces, no statistical evidence to support an association between vector control and malaria incidence was found. The lack of robustness in these results and the presence of positive associations between vector control and malaria suggested that the NIMPE/IMPE data did not contain any evidence for an effect of vector control on malaria incidence in Vietnam.

The discretionary budget was not significantly associated with any of the three measures of incidence in any of the three regions. Staff trainings were significantly and inversely associated with confirmed and estimated (p < 0.05) cases in the central region; however, in the northern region, staff trainings were positively associated with confirmed (p < 0.01) and estimated ( p< 0.001) cases. Overall, the health capacity variables do not have robust associations with malaria incidence; it is important to remember that as malaria incidence drops, budgets and staff numbers for malaria control programmes will also be reduced.

The results of the entire analysis were robust to the method of calculation for the proportion of treatments for P. falciparum containing artemisinin (see Additional file 3).

Discussion

The most robust statistical association in the data reported by Vietnam’s National Institutes for Malariology, Parasitology, and Entomology from 1991 to 2014 is the negative association between malaria incidence—measured in three different ways—and the purchases of artemisinin-based drugs (as a fraction of total drug purchases) by provincial malaria control programmes. The significant negative association between the proportion of treatments for P. falciparum containing artemisinin and malaria incidence persists whether or not health system variables are included in the analysis and whether the data are analysed regionally or nationally. These findings are consistent with those of Peak et al. [24] in their analysis of southern Vietnam from 1991 to 2010.

Data limitations

Although the predictor data assembled for this study only show that artemisinin-derivatives were purchased (but not used or prescribed), other descriptions of the health system and anti-malarial usage in Vietnam in the 1990s indicate that artemisinin drugs were in fact used and probably favoured, when compared with other drugs, in the treatment of P. falciparum malaria [33, 34]. In 2003, anti-malarial treatment guidelines were updated in Vietnam to reflect the fact that artemisinin therapies had been accepted worldwide as the most effective treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria; indeed, it was the trials conducted in southern Vietnam in the 1990s [4, 5] that initiated these discussions. Non-artemisinin therapies were no longer recommended after 2003 in Vietnam, and the average clinician’s familiarity and experience with artemisinin-based therapies would have meant these drugs were favoured as treatment for malaria. Malaria case numbers were already quite low in 2003 (61,204 estimated cases) and the NIMPE data indicate that sufficient numbers of courses were available for all provinces. Clinicians working in southern Vietnam at the time would estimate that the vast majority of falciparum malaria cases would have received an artemisinin-containing therapy as first-line treatment. Nevertheless, as systematic data on usage or prescription are not available in the NIMPE reports, this is a limitation in the present analysis and any analysis linking drug/treatment purchase data to incidence.

A second limitation of the data is the lack of coverage information. As anti-malarial drugs in Vietnam have been free at least since the 1990s, the question of coverage reduces to a question of access and education. Publicly available demographic health surveys (1997, 2002, 2005) do not contain information on the percentage of children or adults who took an anti-malarial for a febrile episode suspected of being malaria. As with the question on drug purchases and drug use, with no direct coverage data available, the best source of information comes from clinicians with local knowledge of access, treatment-seeking habits, and the current malaria burden. In 2014, it is very likely that treatment coverage for a febrile malaria episode was 100%. It is also likely that, since the turn of century, treatment coverage was very high or near 100%. During the 1990s, it is not possible to make an educated guess on how high treatment coverage levels were. Systematically collected data on coverage do not exist, and this analysis does not aim to test whether treatment coverage was an influential covariate in reducing malaria case counts in Vietnam from 1991 to 2014.

Additional general limitations of this analysis include the reporting system itself as it does not include true positives that did not report to the health system. Individuals with mild symptoms are less likely to seek care and, when they do, are more likely to receive a false negative clinical diagnosis. These cases are known to occur in Vietnam [40], but it is unlikely that they represent a major proportion of the population. Second, the coarse nature of the data (annual aggregation) reduces certainty in associations and prevents observation of short-term effects. A cohort with active surveillance and knowledge on anti-malarial drug use and other interventions would be the ideal data set for inferring these associations. These study designs are common in Africa where transmission levels are still high, but the low number of malaria cases in Vietnam makes such studies impractical.

Comparisons across regions

The results of this study differ substantially from a recent continent-wide analysis in Africa showing that approximately 68% of the decline in malaria from 2000 to 2015 can be attributed to the use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) [1]. One reason may be the differential effort in Vietnam placed on ensuring access to ACT versus distributing ITNs. ACT medicines in Vietnam are free in the public sector and there are virtually no private sector sales. With low annual case numbers and a concentration of cases in a few provinces, Vietnam has achieved nearly full ACT coverage for malaria, while implementation of vector control is irregular and generally reaches < 30% of the population in endemic provinces. This contrasts with the access and treatment scenario in Africa where it was recently reported that only 20% of children under the age of five received an ACT for a confirmed case of P. falciparum malaria [41]. As ACT scale-up from 2000 to 2015 reached only 20% coverage in Africa, while ITN scale-up reached coverages between 40 and 70% [42], perhaps it is not surprising that the estimated effect size of ACT on malaria incidence in Africa is low. In principle, a statistical effect should be detectable for small increases of ACT coverage, but in practice these effects tend to be non-linear and an increase from 0 to 20% may not have the same effect as an increase from 20 to 40%. The differing results between Vietnam and Africa are not necessarily contradictory. It may simply be the case that in Africa we have not yet had an opportunity to fully measure the extent to which ACT could reduce malaria incidence under a scenario of widespread access to ACT.

A second potential explanation for differences in ITN/IRS efficacy across continents may lie in the biting habits of the most common Anopheles species in each region. Three of the most common vector species in central Vietnam (where the majority of malaria transmission occurs today) are Anopheles dirus, Anopheles maculatus, and Anopheles minimus. While An. maculatus appears to bite outdoors and early in the evening (making ITN use less effective), biting behaviour varies substantially for An. dirus and An. minimus [43]. Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus are the most common species in west and central Africa and their feeding and resting habits inside and outside households have been described in numerous studies over the years. Nevertheless, changes through time in anopheline species distributions and feeding habits (due to ITN use or IRS) make it impossible to specify whether vector control measures should be effective based on species distribution alone. Exact feeding habits for each species differ from region to region and frequently depend on past insecticide and bed net use [44], making it difficult to compare large geographic areas on their potential for successful vector-based intervention.

A third possible explanation for the differing conclusions reached using Vietnamese data and African data is that in low transmission regions, ACT case management is more effective than ITN use as a general malaria control policy, whereas the reverse may be true for high transmission regions. ACT case management is a control strategy that works by targeting symptomatic individuals, while vector control acts broadly to protect the entire at-risk population. As a result, ACT case management may be less effective at reducing transmission in highly endemic areas due to the presence of asymptomatic cases that may never be diagnosed and treated [30, 45]. In Vietnam, transmission intensity and population immunity are low, and individuals with malaria are more likely to experience symptoms, seek treatment, and receive an ACT [46, 47]. The population-level effects of ACT case management in areas of low transmission suggest that rapid ACT scale-up could be an effective endgame strategy for regions close to achieving elimination [30]. Additionally, bed nets may have played a less important role in the decline of malaria in Vietnam between 1991 and 2014 due to the challenge of increasing bed net utilization in specific high-risk groups such as forest workers who stay overnight in areas where transmission intensity is the greatest [48].

Positive predictive value

The positive predictive value (PPV) of malaria clinical diagnosis revealed that the average PPV for the years 2010–2014 in the northern part of the country ranged from 0.10 to 54.44%, whereas in the central and southern parts of the country, PPV ranged from 31.4 to 99.2%. In the northern provinces, suspected case counts are high, but confirmed case counts are low. Based on Vietnam’s substantial experience with malaria microscopy and clinical malaria diagnosis, and the existence of a centralized malaria health system, it is likely that over-reporting of suspected malaria cases is occurring in the northern provinces. It is much less likely that a lack of microscopes, microscopists, or a truly low PPV of clinical diagnosis is the cause of the large number of suspected cases reported from the north.

Outlook

A key evaluation that will need to be made in the coming years is whether the use of ACT in Vietnam continues to be associated with declining malaria in the presence of drug resistance. Mutations in the kelch protein of P. falciparum have been shown to be associated with slower clearance of parasites by the artemisinin derivatives [49]. These mutations were first seen at appreciable frequency in Binh Phuoc province in Vietnam during the last 4 months of 2014 [50], and they should be monitored in conjunction with absolute case counts to determine if additional control efforts are needed due to failed treatments and sustained incidence.

With communicable diseases still playing a large role in the World Health Organization’s health-related Sustainable Development Goals for 2030, malaria elimination will stay on the agenda as an important public health priority in countries that are in or approaching near-elimination phase. Vietnam reported fewer than 10,000 confirmed malaria cases both in 2015 and 2016, placing it in a small group of 30–35 countries that could realistically eliminate malaria by 2030 [51]. As monitoring and active surveillance scale up during this phase, it is critical to understand the local causes of malaria decline over the past ten or more years that have enabled each country to reach near-elimination phase. In Vietnam, the path to low malaria incidence has clearly been led by high levels of artemisinin and ACT use in the public sector at coverage rates that can realistically be considered as having a noticeable impact on malaria elimination in some provinces. Active surveillance, reactive case detection, and following at-risk groups are the next key focal areas in Vietnam’s next phase of moving the majority of its provinces to zero malaria over the next decade. The major gloom on the horizon is the spread of artemisinin-resistant genotypes in Vietnam [50, 52, 53], as the arrival of drug-resistance can undermine elimination efforts [54, 55]. It is uncertain if a public health response in this context (e.g., lengthening ACT courses, follow-up with second-line drugs) will be sufficient to maintain the cure rates previously observed with ACT and keep Vietnam on the road to elimination. Public health agencies and researchers must work together during this time to share knowledge and data, remain open to quick changes in public health strategy, and squarely keep the focus on the public good of eliminating malaria.

References

  1. 1.

    Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Cameron E, Bisanzio D, Mappin B, Dalrymple U, et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature. 2015;526(7572):207–11.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hien TT, White NJ, et al. Qinghaosu. Lancet. 1993;341:603–8.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Arnold K, Hien TT, Chinh NT, Phu NH, Mai PP. A randomized comparative study of artemisinine (qinghaosu) suppositories and oral quinine in acute falciparum malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1990;84:499–502.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hien TT, Tam DTH, Cue NTK, Arnold K. Comparative effectiveness of artemisinin suppositories and oral quinine in children with acute falciparum malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1991;85:210–1.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Nosten F, van Vugt M, Price R, Luxemburger C, Thway K, Brockman A, et al. Effects of artesunate-mefloquine combination on incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria and mefloquine resistance in western Thailand: a prospective study. Lancet. 2000;356:297–302.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hien TT, Arnold K, Vinh H, Cuong BM, Phu NH, Chau TTH, et al. Comparison of artemisinin suppositories with intravenous artesunate and intravenous quinine in the treatment of cerebral malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992;86:582–3.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nosten F, Luxemburger C, ter Kuile FO, Woodrow C, Pa EhJ, Chongsuphajaisiddhi T, et al. Treatment of multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria with 3-day artesunate-mefloquine combination. J Infect Dis. 1994;170:971–7.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sutherland CJ, Ord R, Dunyo S, Jawara M, Drakeley CJ, Alexander N, et al. Reduction of malaria transmission to anopheles mosquitoes with a six-dose regimen of co-artemether. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e92.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hien TT, Dolecek C, Pham PM, Nguyen TD, Nguyen TT, Le HT, et al. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine against multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Vietnam: randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2004;363:18–22.

    Article CAS Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yeka A, Banek K, Bakyaita N, Staedke SG, Kamya MR, Talisuna A, et al. Artemisinin versus nonartemisinin combination therapy for uncomplicated malaria: randomized clinical trials from four sites in Uganda. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e190.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Smithuis F, Kyaw MK, Phe O, Aye KZ, Htet L, Barends M, et al. Efficacy and effectiveness of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus artesunate–mefloquine in falciparum malaria: an open-label randomised comparison. Lancet. 2006;367:2075–85.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    International Artemisinin Study Group. Artesunate combinations for treatment of malaria: meta-analysis. Lancet. 2004;363:9–17.

    Article CAS Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Price RN, Nosten F, Luxemburger C, ter Kuile FO, Paiphun L, Chongsuphajaisiddhi T, et al. Effects of artemisinin derivatives on malaria transmissibility. Lancet. 1996;347:1654–8.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Targett G, Drakeley C, Jawara M, von Seidlein L, Coleman R, Deen J, et al. Artesunate reduces but does not prevent posttreatment transmission of Plasmodium falciparum to Anopheles gambiae. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:1254–9.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Drakeley CJ, Jawara M, Targett GAT, Walraven G, Obisike U, Coleman R, et al. Addition of artesunate to chloroquine for treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Gambian children causes a significant but short-lived reduction in infectiousness for mosquitoes. Trop Med Int Health. 2004;9:53–61.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bousema JT, Schneider P, Gouagna LC, Drakeley CJ, Tostmann A, Houben R, et al. Moderate effect of artemisinin-based combination therapy on transmission of Plasmodium falciparum. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:1151–9.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    White NJ. Assessment of the pharmacodynamic properties of antimalarial drugs in vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1413–22.

    PubMed PubMed Central CAS Article Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Stepniewska K, Ashley E, Lee SJ, Anstey N, Barnes KI, Binh TQ, et al. In vivo parasitological measures of artemisinin susceptibility. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:570–9.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    White NJ. Qinghaosu (artemisinin): the price of success. Science. 2008;320:330–4.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bousema T, Drakeley C. Epidemiology and infectivity of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax gametocytes in relation to malaria control and elimination. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24:377–410.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ross A, Killeen G, Smith T. Relationships between host infectivity to mosquitoes and asexual parasite density in Plasmodium falciparum. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:32–7.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    O’Meara WP, Mangeni JN, Steketee R, Greenwood B. Changes in the burden of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:545–55.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Peak CM, Thuan PD, Britton A, Nguyen TD, Wolbers M, Thanh NV, et al. Measuring the association between artemisinin-based case management and malaria incidence in southern Vietnam, 1991–2010. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92:811–7.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bhattarai A, Ali AS, Kachur SP, Martensson A, Abbas AK, Khatib R, et al. Impact of artemisinin-based combination therapy and insecticide-treated nets on malaria burden in Zanzibar. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e309.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sawa P, Shekalaghe SA, Drakeley CJ, Sutherland CJ, Mweresa CK, Baidjoe AY, et al. Malaria transmission after artemether–lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine: a randomized trial. J Infect Dis. 2013;207:1637–45.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Landier J, Parker DM, Thu AM, Carrara VI, Lwin KM, Bonnington CA, et al. The role of early detection and treatment in malaria elimination. Malar J. 2016;15:363.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Landier J, Kajeechiwa L, Thwin MM, Parker DM, Chaumeau V, Wiladphaingern J, et al. Safety and effectiveness of mass drug administration to accelerate elimination of artemisinin-resistant falciparum malaria: a pilot trial in four villages of Eastern Myanmar. Wellcome Open Res. 2017;2:81 (version 1; referees: 2 approved).

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Okell LC, Drakeley CJ, Ghani AC, Bousema T, Sutherland CJ. Reduction of transmission from malaria patients by artemisinin combination therapies: a pooled analysis of six randomized trials. Malar J. 2008;7:125.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Okell LC, Drakeley CJ, Bousema T, Whitty CJ, Ghani AC. Modelling the impact of artemisinin combination therapy and long-acting treatments on malaria transmission intensity. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e226.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Maude RJ, Socheat D, Nguon C, Saroth P, Dara P, Li G, et al. Optimising strategies for Plasmodium falciparum malaria elimination in Cambodia: primaquine, mass drug administration and artemisinin resistance. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37166.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Okell LC, Cairns M, Griffin JT, Ferguson NM, Tarning J, Jagoe G, et al. Contrasting benefits of different artemisinin combination therapies as first-line malaria treatments using model-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5606.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ettling MB. Control of malaria in Vietnam from 1980 to 2000: what went right? World Health Organization, regional office for the western Pacific. 2002. http://zanran_storage.s3.amazonaws.com/www.wpro.who.int/ContentPages/20813052.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2018.

  34. 34.

    Schuftan C. A story to be shared: the successful fight against malaria in Vietnam. WHO WPRO and the global Roll Back Malaria Programme. 2000. https://www.panna.org/sites/default/files/vietnamMalaraStudy20071106.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2018.

  35. 35.

    Erhart A, Thang ND, Xa NX, Thieu NQ, Hung LX, Hung NQ, et al. Accuracy of the health information system on malaria surveillance in Vietnam. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101:216–25.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Van Nam N, de Vries PJ, Van Toi L, Nagelkerke N. Malaria control in Vietnam: the Binh Thuan experience. Trop Med Int Health. 2005;10:357–65.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    General Statistics Office of Vietnam. Population and employment. 2017. http://www.gso.gov.vn/Default_en.aspx?tabid=491. Accessed 31 May 2018.

  38. 38.

    Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13–22.

    Article Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Halekoh U, Højsgaard S, Yan J. The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Softw. 2006;15:1–11.

    Article Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Imwong M, Nguyen TN, Tripura R, Peto TJ, Lee SJ, Lwin KM, et al. The epidemiology of subclinical malaria infections in South-East Asia: findings from cross-sectional surveys in Thailand–Myanmar border areas, Cambodia, and Vietnam. Malar J. 2015;14:381.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bennett A, Bisanzio D, Yukich JO, Mappin B, Fergus CA, Lynch M, et al. Population coverage of artemisinin-based combination treatment in children younger than 5 years with fever and Plasmodium falciparum infection in Africa, 2003–2015: a modelling study using data from national surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(4):e418–27.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Mappin B, Dalrymple U, Cameron E, Bisanzio D, et al. Coverage and system efficiencies of insecticide-treated nets in Africa from 2000 to 2017. eLife. 2015;4:e09672.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Trung HD, Bortel WV, Sochantha T, Keokenchanh K, Briët OJ, Coosemans M. Behavioural heterogeneity of Anopheles species in ecologically different localities in Southeast Asia: a challenge for vector control. Trop Med Int Health. 2005;10:251–62.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Gatton ML, Chitnis N, Churcher T, Donnelly MJ, Ghani AC, Godfray HCJ, et al. The importance of mosquito behavioral adaptations to malaria control in Africa. Evolution. 2013;67:1218–30.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bousema T, Okell L, Felger I, Drakeley C. Asymptomatic malaria infections: detectability, transmissibility and public health relevance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:833–40.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lindblade KA, Steinhardt L, Samuels A, Kachur SP, Slutsker L. The silent threat: asymptomatic parasitemia and malaria transmission. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2013;11:623–39.

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Snow RW, Marsh K. The consequences of reducing transmission of Plasmodium falciparum in Africa. Adv Parasitol. 2002;52:235–64.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Thanh PV, Hong NV, Van NV, Malderen CV, Obsomer V, Rosanas-Urgell A, et al. Epidemiology of forest malaria in central Vietnam: the hidden parasite reservoir. Malar J. 2015;14:86.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ashley EA, Dhorda M, Fairhurst RM, Amaratunga C, Lim P, Suon S, et al. Spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. New Engl J Med. 2014;371:411–23.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Thuy-Nhien N, Tuyen NK, Tong NT, Vy T, Thanh NV, Van HT, et al. K13-propeller mutations in Plasmodium falciparum populations in malaria endemic regions of Vietnam from 2009 to 2016. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e01578-16.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    World Health Organization. Malaria eliminating. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hien TT, Thuy-Nhien NT, Phu NH, Boni MF, Thanh NV, Nha-Ca NT, et al. In vivo susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to artesunate in Binh Phuoc Province, Vietnam. Malar J. 2012;11:355.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Imwong M, Suwannasin K, Kunasol C, Sutawong K, Mayxay M, Rekol H, et al. The spread of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in the Greater Mekong subregion: a molecular epidemiology observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:491–7.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Maude RJ, Pontavornpinyo W, Saralamba S, Aguas R, Yeung S, Dondorp AM, et al. The last man standing is the most resistant: eliminating artemisinin-resistant malaria in Cambodia. Malar J. 2009;8:31.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Nguyen TD, Olliaro P, Dondorp AM, Baird JK, Lam HM, Farrar J, et al. Optimum population-level use of artemisinin combination therapies: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3:e758–66.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

PDT, NDT, JF, MFB, TTH designed the study. SMG, MFB, BTG developed the analysis. DDHG and TDN quantified the data collection methods and validated the data. PDT, NDT, GET, NVT, TTH compared epidemiological results to expectations based on clinical case management practice in Vietnam. SMG analysed the data and wrote the first draft of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

SMG would like to thank the New Voices in Global Health program for the opportunity to present this work at the World Health Summit in Berlin, Germany in October 2016.

Competing interests

JF is the director of the Wellcome Trust. The authors declare that they have no other competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Data can be made available to other investigators on the basis of a collaboration with Vietnam’s National Institutes for Hygiene and Epidemiology (NIMPE) by contacting NIMPE directly.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

SMG was supported by a grant from the Princeton University Council for International Teaching and Research. PDT, DDHG, NVT, TDN, and TTH are supported by Wellcome Trust grant 089276/B/09/7. MFB was supported by a Wellcome Trust/Royal Society Sir Henry Dale Fellowship (098511/Z/12/Z) and is currently supported by the Pennsylvania State University.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Affiliations

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maciej F. Boni.

Additional files

Additional file 1.

Regional groupings of provinces used in the analysis.

Additional file 2.

Additional methods and tables.

Additional file 3.

Regression results using the alternative calculation for the proportion of treatments containing artemisinin.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goldlust, S.M., Thuan, P.D., Giang, D.D.H. et al. The decline of malaria in Vietnam, 1991–2014. Malar J 17, 226 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2372-8

Download citation

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:




No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.