There are significant proven health effects from wireless technology and wireless devices. These include insomnia, headaches, fatigue, heart palpitations, all caused by exposure to wireless devices and their radiation problems. More serious symptoms and conditions include heart arrhythmia, infertility, tinnitus, numbness or tingling in the extremities, diabetes, cancer, and permanent DNA damage.
Here's the video. Again, the full transcript can be found below the video on this page.
EX PRESIDENT OF MICROSOFT IN CANADA- 5G UNVEILED FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE IN IT-EXPLAINED BY CANADIAN
Transcript of what Frank Clegg says:
"Hello my name is Frank Clegg and I spent over 40 years in the technology sector.
My most recent position was the president of Microsoft Canada. In my career, I’ve seen the tremendous benefit that technology can provide. I've also seen the potential harm if technology is not implemented correctly, and I believe our current implementation of Wireless technology is not safe. That's why I co-founded Canadians for Safe Technology, and why I joined the business advisory Group of The Environmental Health Trust.
I’m especially concerned about our current implementation of 5G Wireless technology, and the more research I do, the more experts I talk to, the more concerned I become.
Now there’s no doubt that there are benefits such as autonomous vehicles, and faster download speeds. But at the same time, I think there’s potential harm. I think it’s important that we understand that 5G is not just an incremental number on our cell phones.
In fact, over 230 scientists and researchers, from 41 countries around the world have formally written to the United Nations, their member nations, and the World Health Organization, expressing their concern over the planned rollout of 5G technology, especially for vulnerable populations such as children, pregnant women, and the environmentally sensitive. They have been joined by State legislatures and federal Regulators who have asked the FCC to provide evidence that there is NO HARM from the rollout of 5G technology.
There is no doubt that the engineers and businesses and companies that roll out technology are well-meaning. However, their focus is on being first to market, and getting new products into the market, as efficiently and quickly as it can. I am not aware of ANY research or studies by my industry or related industry that deal at all with the health or safety effects of wireless technology.
Here are some important facts about 5G:
5G technology has not been tested. I am not aware of a single study that shows that 5G technology is safe. 5G, as in all other wireless technology, gives off radio frequency radiation, which is absorbed in the human body, and it accumulates in the human body.
One segment of 5G technology are millimeter waves. Millimeter waves are used by the US and Israeli government, in their active denial systems, which are used for crowd control. What they do is they provide a very painful reaction to skin or means of the body. We have no idea what the impacts will be, to human health, if that kind of millimeter wave technology is used, and we’re exposed to it, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. There are significant proven health effects from wireless technology and wireless devices. These include insomnia, headaches, fatigue, heart palpitations, all caused by exposure to wireless devices and their radiation problems.
More serious symptoms and conditions include heart arrhythmia, infertility, tinnitus, numbness or tingling in the extremities, diabetes, cancer, and permanent DNA damage. Mental health is also impacted, with increased anxiety, depression, rises in ADHD and autism, mood swings, and emotional instability. In fact, all these health factors and conditions have risen exponentially over the last 30 years, and hundreds of studies have shown proof of biological harm from wireless devices. Most recently, in 2018, the National Institute of Health’s National Toxicology program released the findings of a 14 year, 25 million dollar study, that showed clear evidence of harm, in terms of cancer and permanent DNA damage. This study, several months later, was verified by the prestigious Ramizini institute out of Italy that found the same results.
Now you may ask how a product that has this potential harm could ever be released to the market, and to the public, for public use. The way the process works is, the FCC regulates all wireless devices and products associated with them.
The FCC guidelines are based on small, short term, infrequent exposure. They do not worry about the accumulated effects from multiple devices. They don't measure or monitor the effects of exposure, 24 hours a day or 7 days a week, and they have no special consideration for children, pregnant women, or those who have shown environmental sensitivities to wireless radiation.
In terms of the guidelines there's actually NO oversight provided by the FCC, and in fact the telecommunications industry is SELF-POLICING. So, what we're left with, is almost a wild west scenario where the regulations and the guidelines are significantly lacking and the industry is left to it's own accord, to roll this technology out to the marketplace.
In addition to the concerns about the FCC Guidelines themselves, The Federal Telecommunications Act in 1996 prohibits any telecommunication company to be sued on the basis of the safety or health of their products. So in other words, there is NO LIABILITY to the telecommunications industry of any of the impacts of their products.
Just last week, the reinsurer Swiss Re came out with their annual forecast, and they specifically identified 5G technology as an upcoming insurable health concern globally, over the next 3 years.
There is also growing concern that the telecommunications industry knew about the potential impacts of RF radiation years ago, and in fact we're starting to see some of the behavior from my industry, similar to what the Tobacco industry did over the last few decades.
The telecommunications industry has over 500 lobbyists working in congress and other areas of legislation protecting the industry.
Together, all these issues I've referenced, plus the general lack of awareness in the general public have led us to the situation where we are today. So where are we today?
Today we currently have a significant amount of exposure in our homes, in our businesses, in our schools, and in most public areas where we go to, today. Cisco has announced and predicted that by 2030, there will be over 500 billion wirelessly connected devices in the world. That works out to be almost 60 devices for every person on the planet. Many states and cities around the world are debating and passing legislation about the rollout of 5G technology, and in fact what we're seeing in the US is that on the Federal and the state level, they're fast-tracking some of this legislation to support the rollout of 5G infrastructure.
Unfortunately this legislation seems to be taking away all individual rights, and the rights of local towns, counties and cities in passing more power to the telecommunication companies. We believe this is a historic and precedent-setting power shift from the individual and state and local level, over to an industry.
In fact, many communities in the US and around the world are passing moratoriums preventing the rollout of 5G technology until it is proven safe.
5G WILL impact you personally. There are designs that show the requirement for small cell 5G antennas as close as every 3rd house in the neighborhood, and could be as close as every 500 feet in public areas. The impact of that radiation at that level of frequency and intensity and power, 24 hrs a day and 7 days a week is unprecedented and is not understood.
I've spent the last 5 years of my life and have had the opportunity to meet with experts worldwide, experts who have spent their careers studying the impact of wireless radiation and devices. I've also had the opportunity to meet with some of the great minds in the technology sector who have helped to create these tremendous products that we use in our lives and provide tremendous benefit to us.
I'm convinced that there are safer alternatives available, so we can have the best of both worlds. Technology that can provide the tremendous benefits, but technology that is safe. There is no incentive or motivation to provide the research and the funding to look for safer alternatives. So that's why it's UP TO US to help encourage that investment. That can be by asking our legislators to pass legislation, encouraging the industry to do it, or it can be by us directly, trying to advocate for change in the industry to allow them to become more responsible, to provide safer technology that still provides tremendous benefit. We can't do this all on our own, we need your help.
Here's what you can do. The most important thing is to get educated. We provide a little bit of an overview in some of the scientific evidence that shows this as a potential harm. But now you have to take the initiative. There are some tremendous websites:
Canadians for Safe Technology,
The Environmental Health Trust,
SaferEMR.com, and the
Physicians for Safe Technology.
There are also other resources that are listed at the end of this video. We encourage you to spread the word, share this information, share the video, with your coworkers, with your family, with your friends, with legislators at the state and federal level, even your local school boards can have an impact if they choose to engage. Ultimately your knowledge is in your power, and your power is in your hands. I fundamentally believe we can have the best of both worlds that has access to the technology and the tremendous benefit it provides, but in a safe manner. We are advocates for SAFE technology, not NO technology.
I thank you for your time."
From the Swiss Re website:
https://www.swissre.com/institute/research/sonar/sonar2019/SONAR2019-off-the-leash.html
Off the leash – 5G mobile networks
5G – short for fifth generation – is the latest standard for cellular mobile communications. Providing ultrafast broadband connection with higher capacity and lower latency, 5G is not only heaven for your smartphone. It will enable wireless connectivity in real time for any device of the Internet of things (IoT), whether that be autonomous cars or sensor-steered factory. In doing so, it will allow decentralised seamless interconnectivity between devices.
To allow for a functional network coverage and increased capacity overall, more antennas will be needed, including acceptance of higher levels of electromagnetic radiation. In some jurisdictions, the rise of threshold values will require legal adaptation. Existing concerns regarding potential negative health effects from electromagnetic fields (EMF) are only likely to increase. An uptick in liability claims could be a potential long-term consequence.
Other concerns are focused on cyber exposures, which increase with the wider scope of 5G wireless attack surfaces. Traditionally IoT devices have poor security features. Moreover, hackers can also exploit 5G speed and volume, meaning that more data can be stolen much quicker. A large-scale breakthrough of autonomous cars and other IoT applications will mean that security features need to be enhanced at the same pace. Without, interruption and subversion of the 5G platform could trigger catastrophic, cumulative damage. With a change to more automation facilitated by new technology like 5G, we might see a further shift from motor to more general and product liability insurance.
There are also worries about privacy issues (leading to increased litigation risks), security breaches and espionage. The focus is not only on hacking by third parties, but also potential breaches from built-in hard- or software “backdoors.” In addition, the market for 5G infrastructure is currently focussed on a couple of firms, and that raises the spectre of concentration risk.
Potential impacts:
Cyber exposures are significantly increased with 5G, as attacks become faster and higher in volume. This increases the challenge of defence.
Growing concerns of the health implications of 5G may lead to political friction and delay of implementation, and to liability claims. The introductions of 3G and 4G faced similar challenges.
Information security and national sovereignty concerns might delay implementation of 5G further, increasing uncertainty for planning authorities, investors, tech companies and insurers.
Heated international dispute over 5G contractors and potential for espionage or sabotage could affect international cooperation, and impact financial markets negatively.
As the biological effects of EMF in general and 5G in particular are still being debated, potential claims for health impairments may come with a long latency.
About Frank Clegg:
Other videos:
5G EFFECTS ON DIABETES AND MENTAL HEALTH - VETERAN MD DROPS BOMBSHELL ABOUT 5G TECHNOLOGY DANGERS
DR. THOMAS COWAN, MD ON 5G EFFECTS ON THE HUMAN BODY
5G/EMF HEALTH EFFECTS
HISTORIC WIN AGAINST 5G DANGERS - ROBERT F. KENNEDY - THE HIGHWIRE WITH DEL BIGTREE
5G: Next Gen Health Dangers (Documentary)
COVID & 5G CONNECTION – ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION SICKNESS – DR. LEE MERRITT
DR CHARLIE WARD ON 5G EMF PROTECTION WITH EXPERT STEVE LEPKOWSKI
DR. PRIYANKA BANDARA ITNJ TESTIMONY - HEALTH EFFECTS OF EMFS
5G, CELL PHONE RADIATION HEALTH EFFECTS LENNART HARDELL MD EXPERT LECTURE 4/2019
"THE TRUTH ABOUT MOBILE PHONE AND WIRELESS RADIATION" DR. DEVRA DAVIS
5G EXPLAINED - RADIATION POISONING IS CAUSING SICKNESS
Yes, cell phones really can cause cancer. Have a look at this video and you'll see some pretty strong evidence. There are MANY videos out there, showing women who've developed cancer in areas of their body where they kept their cell phones. Same is true for men who kept cell phones in their pockets, and people who held cell phones too close to their head, for too long, for too many years.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/k3jTrZ2hDjtc/
https://www.brighteon.com/de2d6354-5983-409f-b65a-ad2be01445ef
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GAjCLgCgsUUU/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Wieha9p6NLoO/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UluAc0JI8NZm/
The following article can be found on the Children's Health Defense site, via this link:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/5g-radiation-microwave-syndrome-symptoms/
Please consider subscribing to their newsletter - it is very informative!
5G Radiation Causes ‘Microwave Syndrome’ Symptoms, Study Finds
In the first study of its kind, Swedish researchers found 5G radiation causes typical symptoms indicative of “microwave syndrome.” The study, published in the journal Medicinsk Access, also confirmed that non-ionizing radiation — well below levels allowed by authorities — can cause health problems.
58
Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender's Top News of the Day. It's free.
In the first study of its kind, Swedish researchers found 5G radiation causes typical symptoms indicative of “microwave syndrome.”
The study, published in the journal Medicinsk Access, also confirmed that non-ionizing radiation — well below levels allowed by authorities — can cause health problems.
According to the study, a 5G base station installed on the roof of an apartment building caused extremely high levels of non-ionizing radiation in the apartment of the two persons living just below the station.
Within a few days of exposure, the residents of the apartment developed symptoms of microwave syndrome. After moving to a place with lower radiation, the symptoms quickly decreased or disappeared.
Measurements before and after the installation of the 5G installation showed that switching to 5G led to an increase in radiation from 9 milliWatts/m2 to a maximum of 1,690 milliWatts/m2 — high enough for both acute and long-term health effects.
Measurements were taken both before 5G deployment and on several occasions afterward.
Before 5G was installed there were already base stations for 3G or 4G in the same location directly above the apartment. So even though the radiation level before switching to 5G was high, after switching on 5G, the levels increased 188 times.
This shows that non-ionizing radiation from a 5G base station placed on a roof close to a living space can be exceedingly high.
The highest radiation level was detected in the bedroom, located just 5 meters below the base station, prompting the authors of the study to call for further investigation into the effects on people exposed to 5G radiation levels.
“It is shocking that this is the first study performed on 5G health effects, three years after the roll-out of this technology started and after having already exposed the population to 5G high-intensity pulsed microwave radiation for several years,” Mona Nilsson, managing director of the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation and co-author of the study, told The Defender.
Nilsson added:
“There are no studies that show that this technology and the increasing and common exposure to 5G and 4G base stations at levels allowed by the government is safe. On the contrary, studies have repeatedly and convincingly showed increased risk of the microwave syndrome and cancer, at levels that are far below the levels that the government and the telecom companies falsely claim are safe.”
Oncologist and researcher Dr. Lennart Hardell from the Environment and Cancer Research Foundation, co-authored the study with Nilsson.
Tracking the subjects’ symptoms
In the study, a man and a woman, ages 63 and 62 years old, were exposed to 5G from the roof of their apartment building, beginning in November 2021. The individuals recorded their symptoms both before and after the exposure began.
Table 1 below, column 1, lists typical symptoms of microwave syndrome.
The second column (Before 5G) displays the self-assessed symptoms before 5G was deployed in the apartment, the third column (With 5G) shows the self-assessment after 5G was installed, and the fourth column (After 5G) indicates the perceived symptoms after moving to the new apartment, which had much lower non-ionizing radiation levels.
The man and the woman experienced fatigue, sleeping problems, dizziness, emotional effects such as irritability and depression, nose bleeds, tinnitus, heart symptoms, memory problems and skin issues, all typically associated with microwave syndrome.
All symptoms ceased or decreased within 24 hours (for the man) and 1-3 days (for the woman) of moving to the new apartment with low radiation levels.
Microwave syndrome — a brief history
Microwave syndrome was described in the 1970s by scientists in the former Soviet Union who were researching occupational risks due to exposure to non-ionizing radiation.
The Soviet researchers described multiple symptoms of the syndrome, including fatigue, dizziness, headaches, difficulty sleeping, concentration problems, mood swings, tinnitus, heart palpitations and memory loss.
The researchers noted the symptoms subsided when exposure to non-ionizing radiation ceased or decreased.
The most common cause of microwave syndrome symptoms is non-ionizing radiation exposure from cell phones, base stations for wireless communication, WiFi and smart meters.
The exposed person usually experiences symptoms in several bodily organs, although most often the symptoms are related to the central nervous system and the heart.
The symptoms vary from person to person, as sensitivity to microwave radiation is individual.
Several studies during the last 20 years have shown increased risk of microwave syndrome symptoms among people living near mobile phone base stations.
For example, a study out of India showed increased incidences of sleeping problems, headaches, dizziness, irritability, concentration problems and high blood pressure.
Increased non-ionizing radiation due to 5G
The Swedish study not only showed that 5G causes microwave syndrome almost immediately, but it also found the levels of non-ionizing radiation increased massively.
The values measured in the home of the man and woman in the study (maximum 1,690 milliWatts/m2) are significantly lower than those deemed safe (10,000 milliWatts/m2 as an average value over 6 minutes) by the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM).
Because microwave radiation tends to fluctuate wildly, and SSM’s reference is an average value, this means the maximum value is allowed to be significantly higher than 10,000 milliWatts/m2, and it does not protect against large fluctuations which are in fact more biologically active.
Furthermore, SSM’s reference value does not protect against long-term harmful effects, such as the microwave syndrome or cancer, that come with prolonged exposure from base stations, as is the case with exposure in homes, offices or schools.
The reference value applies only to protection against immediate effects as a result of radiation so intense that it heats up tissues within 30 minutes.
This means the general public is completely unprotected against effects other than acute thermal damage, despite the fact that such effects have been shown to cause nervous system harm, oxidative stress and DNA damage.
Study shows need to revisit ‘safe’ levels of non-ionizing radiation
Prior to their study, the authors noted, there were no scientific studies showing no risk of harmful health effects from chronic exposure to non-ionizing radiation from base stations at levels corresponding to SSM’s reference value, or at the levels measured in this case study.
There are not even any studies of any long-term risks of combining the non-ionizing radiation from 4G and 5G.
Hardell and Nilsson concluded, “To claim that exposure to radiation does not entail risks because the exposure is lower than SSM’s reference value thus has no scientific basis at all.”
In 2016, a group of researchers and doctors recommended maximum exposure during the day should be 0.1 and at night 0.01 milliWatts/m2.
However, despite extensive evidence of health risks, microwave radiation in the environment is increasing sharply. Still, the outdated reference value is used despite the fact it is demonstrably lacking protection against microwave syndrome and many other health risks.
Lennart Hardell and Mona Nilsson called for in-depth investigations of persons complaining of microwave syndrome-related problems who may be exposed to elevated levels of microwave radiation.
“Careful [patient] history must be taken to investigate various sources of microwave radiation,” they wrote. “In addition, the investigation should be supplemented with measurement of the radiation both in the home and at the workplace.”
Such patients must be properly investigated and given a medical diagnosis, with careful consideration taken to eliminate or reduce the disease-causing factor — that is, reduce exposure to non-ionizing radiation, as being the most important. This should be done as early as possible to reduce the risk of irreversible damage or chronic disease.
Furthermore, it has to be emphasized that the measured values in the studied apartment after the installation of 5G make the home uninhabitable from a medical point of view, regardless of the fact that the radiation is below the current reference values.
Nilsson said the telecommunications industry is “trying its hardest” to keep any information about the health hazards of this technology from the public “with the help of their captured organizations, the World Health Organization, the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection and other governmental agencies.”
She added: “Major telecom companies know the radiation they force on the public is dangerous. They have known it for decades, but still they do all they can to hide the truth from the public and force the technology on us all.”