Here are a whooole bunch of reasons why Joe Biden needs to stop calling this a "Pandemic of the Unvaccinated."
In the Highwire video below, you can see a Yale study that shows that two doses of COVID-19 vaccines was not protective against Omicron infection at any time, and the Vaccine Efficacy (VE) was negative 38%. This means that these vaccines actually made the vaccine recipients more susceptible to being infected with COVID!
large
From the Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/23/vaccinated-people-now-make-up-majority-covid-deaths/
Covid is no longer mainly a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Here’s why.
The Washington Post’s essential guide to health policy news
It’s no longer a pandemic of the unvaccinated
For the first time, a majority of Americans dying from the coronavirus received at least the primary series of the vaccine.
Fifty-eight percent of coronavirus deaths in August were people who were vaccinated or boosted, according to an analysis conducted for The Health 202 by Cynthia Cox, vice president at the Kaiser Family Foundation.
It’s a continuation of a troubling trend that has emerged over the past year. As vaccination rates have increased and new variants appeared, the share of deaths of people who were vaccinated has been steadily rising. In September 2021, vaccinated people made up just 23 percent of coronavirus fatalities. In January and February this year, it was up to 42 percent, per our colleagues Fenit Nirappil and Dan Keating.
DATA SHOWS COVID VACCINES ARE ACTUALLY ACCELERATING INFECTION AND TRANSMISSION!
If this seems hard to believe, please CLICK HERE to learn about how the COVID vaccines are triggering Antibody Dependent Enhancement (A.D.E.), which many doctors and scientists have been trying to warn the public about, since the beginning of the pandemic. Even Tony Fauci admitted that this is something that could happen, and it would be our worst-case-scenario!
Here is a legal update from ICAN (the Informed Consent Action Network), sent out on 3/28/22, that you really should see:
|
ICAN has obtained an official response to FOIA requests submitted by ICAN’s attorneys to the CDC regarding the number of positive COVID-19 cases among its employees, as well as how many of those individuals were vaccinated for COVID-19. The official response (given with a whole bunch of caveats, meaning, “cover your butt” excuses) was that approximately 70% of COVID-19 cases among the CDC employees in August 2021 were in those vaccinated for COVID-19! Now, we don’t know the percent of CDC employees that were vaccinated as of August 2021, but if the CDC’s vaccination rate reflects that of adults in the United States, it was far less than 70%. But even if more than 70% of CDC employees were vaccinated, the fact that by the end of Summer 2021, 70% of its COVID-19 positive employees were vaccinated should have been a shocking figure and should have served as a wake-up call to the CDC about the failure of these vaccines to prevent infection. The CDC’s incredible excuse for why this figure could be incorrect is that its employees were teleworking to the extent possible and were not required to report their vaccination status or test results. These excuses are unpersuasive. There is no reason to believe that CDC employees would not disclose their vaccination status. There is also no reason to believe those vaccinated would be more likely to report being COVID-19 positive. If anything, those vaccinated would have been less likely to report being COVID-19 positive given that, as the CDC itself says, “persons who have been vaccinated are possibly less likely to get tested.” ICAN will continue to expose the data despite the CDC’s refusal to acknowledge it and course correct. To share this legal update, please use this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ |
Also please be sure to look at Suzanne Humphries' presentation from 2017, further down the page, in which she shows how monkeys in animal trials became more susceptible to viral infection, after being vaccinated.
If it seems too hard to believe our Government could have allowed us to be given vaccines that could actually harm us, please look at the information in these posts about The FDA, The CDC, Big Pharma, and Tony Fauci. They all have a history of misleading the public, and failing to protect human health and safety. Even the W.H.O. admits they have concerns about vaccine safety (despite the fact that they have commercials stating vaccines are safe and effective)!
When you have time, please be sure to watch the 60 Minutes special, on this page about the CDC, which shows all the deception, fear tactics, shaming and propaganda they used to get millions of Americans to take the Swine Flu Vaccine that ended up permanently injuring thousands of Americans! And the CDC director had to admit they had no data on the Swine Flu ever being present in the United States. Funny how history has a way of repeating itself.
THE FIRST TO PREDICT COVID VAX FAILURES
Come On, Charlie Brown, Get Vaccinated, Get Boosted, Get Boosted Again & Again, Then Take Paxlovid
How can they explain any of this data?Here's the first example right now. I will be adding more and more examples over time.
I have over 50 pieces of data that is simply impossible to explain if the vaccines are safe and effective. I’ll be adding them to this article over time, so check back for the latest. I’ll post the most recent additions at the top to make this easy. I’m starting with just one item right now which is the only item you need to know to stop the vaccine mandates. It is so important, I wanted to push it out now. UK government data shows the vaccines make things worse. We were misled.This is data from an unimpeachable source: the UK government in its Feb 2022 report. Look at the rates per 100,000 for doubly vaxxed vs. unvaccinated people for age ranges 40 to 80. Yup, you are more likely to be infected if you are vaccinated in each sub-range within 40 to 80. So there is no age confounding on this data. It’s simply impossible to explain. It shows why vaccine mandates are making you more susceptible to infection for people 40 to 80, not better.
Again, you can see the rest of the post by CLICKING HERE. |
This is per 100,000 people. In every category, the vaccinated did worse.
However this could be age confounded, so the Table below is much tougher to explain.
Here is the original reference.
The date of the report is in European format (Jan 12, 2022).
Government of Canada reveals Fully Vaccinated account for 4 in every 5 Covid-19 Deaths over the past month; the majority Triple Jabbed
The latest official data from the Government of Canada paints an extremely concerning picture for those who have decided to succumb to three doses of a Covid-19 vaccine. The triple vaccinated now […]
Dr. Byram Bridle talks about debates, science, blood, truckers, and Canada
DR SUZANNE HUMPHRIES - Speaking at Michigan for Vaccine Choice, 9 15 17
Transcribed from the video below:
“This article here’s really important. I think this author probably regrets the day he did this study, because a lot of us have not let go of this one. And he did this study on baboons, and his conclusion was that they failed to prevent colonization or transmission, when those baboons were vaccinated.
So, baboons manifest pertussis much the same way that humans do. And so he decided to vaccinate 3 groups of baboons. So, one group, they gave the old fashioned vaccine, the whole-cell vaccine, at 2 months, 4 months and 6 months, and one group he gave the acellular vaccine, the one we use today. At 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months. And then one group of baboons got infected with bacteria up the nose.
And then he decided to wait 1 more month, after they were all recovered from their vaccines, from their infections. And at 7 months, he re-exposed them all to the bacteria by intranasal inoculation.
And what he found, was a surprise, even to him.
The baboons who got the old fashioned vaccine were supposedly somewhat better, still shed bacteria for 18 days after they were re-exposed, ok, so, it’s not because the vaccine sheds, it’s re-exposure to the bacteria, the immune system isn’t fighting it very well, because it stopped fighting at the lung surface, so they’re shedding bacteria from the lungs, for 18 days. That’s the “good” vaccine, ok…
The one (vaccine) we use today, they shed for 42 days, even though they didn’t have symptoms, these baboons had NO symptoms, they weren’t coughing. This is grandma who gets bullied into getting the vaccine so she can be around baby, ok? She’s not coughing, but she has the potential to shed bacteria if she’s in the vicinity of it, for 42 days, and asymptomatically give that to the baby. And everyone will say, “We don’t know where it came from…. It’s these unvaccinated kids!”
Well, the unvaccinated kids are represented on the right. They’re the ones that had the infection recovered and never re-exposed. They couldn’t find any bacteria in the lungs after they were re-exposed, because that had that solid lung immunity.”
And then in the 2nd part of the experiment, they exposed them to what I consider naive baboons, that have no experience with the disease, and no experience with the vaccines, ok. This is the newborn baby who presumably, the mother never had the disease or a vaccine, totally naive immune system, exposes them to the… they didn’t expose them to the whole cell vaccine, and if they did, they didn’t publish the data cause it might have been, again, too embarrassing. But the vaccine that we use today, when they put that baboon who had the vaccine that we use today, and was re-exposed to the pertussis bacteria, infected the cage mates, OK, so that’s proof that grandma can affect your baby, even if you make her get a vaccine. And then, the ones that were recovered from the infection, when they were put in with the naive baboons, there was no transmission.
OK, so this paper is monumental, and speaks volumes.”
You can see this entire talk, by Dr. Suzanne Humphries, in the video below. You can see a whole page about Dr. Humphries, by CLICKING HERE.
Jen Psaki tests positive for COVID
FDA Report - All Causes Mortality Rate 24% Higher Among Vaccinated Group Comparing To Unvaccinated
New Study Finds "Fully Vaccinated and Boosted" Individuals Experience Faster Omicron Spread
NEW STUDY: VACCINATED SPREAD COVID
BIDEN’S SOTU ADDRESS MISLEADS AMERICA ON COVID
PFIZER ADMITS TRIPLE VAX DOESN’T STOP INFECTION
DR. RYAN COLE: NOT ALL ANTIBODIES ARE CREATED EQUAL, THE VAXXED ARE SPREADING VARIANTS LIKE WILDFIRE
80% OF COVID DEATHS IN UK/SCOTLAND HAVE BEEN VAXED AS MANDATORY INJECTIONS ROLL OUT AROUND THE WORLD
Insurance company data suggesting all cause mortality rate is higher in the vaccinated population.
UK Study: Myocarditis Risk Higher Among Vaccinated
The higher the vaccination rate, the higher rate of Covid
GERALDO EATS HUMBLE PIE
Study shows vaccinated get Covid at same rate
CDC Reveals 79% of Omicron Patients Were "Fully Vaccinated", 32% Had Booster Shots | Facts Matter
WHO IS DYING FROM COVID?
CDC says Fully Vaccinated spread Virus
THERE'S NO DATA SHOWING THE COVID VACCINE PROTECTS OTHERS - DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH
85% OF COVID DEATHS COULD'VE BEEN AVOIDED WITH EARLY TREATMENT - DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH
DR.ROBERT MALONE: BRITAIN REVEALS THAT 9 OUT OF 10 PEOPLE DYING OF THE COMMON COLD/FLU ARE VACCINATED
Fourth vaccine dose
COVID VACCINE SECRETS - WHAT WE KNOW - AND MAY NEVER KNOW - ABOUT COVID VACCINES
THE TIDE HAS TURNED
It's shocking to hear one of these nurses talking about how they were delivering Kentucky Fried Chicken to patients in the hospital. Fried foods that cause oxidative stress are one of the absolute worst things that any person with COVID should consume. It creates a chain reaction of free radicals that leads to Oxidative Stress, which can exacerbate a cytokine storm. CLICK HERE to see a page about Oxidative Stress and COVID-19.
THE INOCULATED ARE THE PROBLEM
Pro-Vaccine Doctor Says the Medical Establishment Lacks Evidence to Prove Anti-Vaxxers Wrong - Dr. Joseph Fraiman
From the video the video below:
6,091 Fully Vaccinated Cruise Passengers Suffer Massive Outbreak; 48 Cases Already | Facts Matter
Major Study: Naturally Immune People 99.6% Protected from Re-infection for 9 months | Facts Matter
'CASE RATE IS POSITIVELY CORRELATED AGAINST VACCINATION RATE' - UK COLUMN NEWS
Woman Injured by COVID Vaccine Says "We Are Being Silenced, Abandoned & Cast Aside as Collateral Damage"
CDC Admits Having No Records of 'Naturally Immune People' Transmitting Virus | Facts Matter
ARE THE VACCINATED DRIVING COVID VARIANTS?
NARRATIVE IS COLLAPSING! - POLICE THREATEN CHILDREN! - FAUCI ADMITS JAB DOES NOTHING!
THEY ADMIT IT! - JAB IS THE VARIANT! - CAUSING DEATH & INJURY! - MASSIVE COVERUP EXPOSED!
A PR NIGHTMARE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH
ALL COVID INOCULATIONS TRIGGER THE BREAKDOWN OF IMMUNOLOGICAL DEFENSES
THE CDC SAYS DEFINITION OF 'FULLY VACCINATED' WILL CHANGE AS MANDATORY BOOSTERS ARE COMING
THE PANDEMIC OF THE INJECTED: AS THE COVID NARRATIVE IMPLODES THE WHITE HOUSE DOUBLES DOWN ON LIES
"SIMPLY GENOCIDE" - 379,000 Dead from Jab, Deadly Bioweapon COVID Shots Killing Masses - Steve Kirsch with Stew Peters
The Largest Anti-Vax community In The World: 0 Covid Deaths
Harvard Study, Data From 68 Countries - Increases in COVID-19 are Unrelated to levels of Vaccination
A Cautionary Message From Vaccine Advocates w/ Dr. Aditi Bhargava, Kyle Warner, And Brianne Dressen
Kim Iversen: 'Show Me Your Papers' Becoming More Commonplace In Vaccine Mandate America
FULLY VACCINATED PEOPLE 885% MORE LIKELY TO DIE FROM COVID-19 THAN UNVACCINATED
DANISH STUDY REVEALS ALL VARIANTS MOSTLY INFECT THE "FULLY VACCINATED" & PFIZER'S HIDDEN SAFETY DATA
"WHAT IS KILLING PEOPLE NOW IS VACCINE INJURY!"
It's hard to believe Joe Biden would allow such a ridiculous message with no scientific basis, to appear on the White House's official Website.... but here it is! You can see the full post on THIS PAGE.
https://humansarefree.com/2021/09/covid-19-deaths-higher-than-this-time-last-year.html
BREAKING! Covid-19 Deaths 3,000% Higher Than This Time Last Year And 80% Of The Dead Had The Vaccine
HAFSeptember 24, 2021Trending Now
Authorities claim that the Covid-19 vaccines reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death, and they claim that the vaccines have so far been successful in doing so. But if this is the case, then why are Covid-19 deaths across the UK over 3,000 higher than this time last year? And why are 80% of those dying people who have had the Covid-19 vaccine?
The mainstream media, Public Health sources, and the Government are doing their best to convince you that it is the unvaccinated who make up the majority of those deaths.
One headline published by the Independent newspaper this week even claimed the country would be heading back into lockdown this winter if the unvaccinated cannot be persuaded to get the Covid-19 vaccine:
But you only need to take a look at the latest data available from Public Health Englandto realise that we will be heading into lockdown either way, because it isn’t the unvaccinated that are dying. The latest report reveals that 72% of Covid-19 deaths in England have been among the vaccinated since February 1st 2021 up to September 12th 2021, with the vast majority among the fully vaccinated.
The latest data from Public Health Scotland also confirms the same.
Official data shows that between the 14th August 2020 and the 12th September 2020 just 7 Covid-19 deaths were recorded in the whole of Scotland. But fast forward to the present day and official data shows 222 deaths were recorded across Scotland between the 14th August 2021 and the 12th September 2021.
This means Covid-19 deaths across Scotland are currently 3,071.4% higher than they were this time last year, despite the majority of the population of being vaccinated and summer being on their side.
The latest Covid-19 statistical report released by Public Health Scotland on the 22nd September also reveals that from August 21st through to September 17th 2021, 69,639 positive cases were recorded among the unvaccinated population, whilst 79,613 cases were recorded among the vaccinated population; 60,923 of which were among the fully vaccinated.
As you can see the number of cases is very similar between the unvaccinated population and fully vaccination population so you would expect to see a similar number of deaths among the unvaccinated and fully vaccinated population.
But table 17 of the latest report shows that this isn’t the case, as the fully vaccinated have accounted for the vast majority of Covid-19 deaths every week since the 14th August through to the 10th September, and our previous analysis of PHS reports also shows that the fully vaccinated have been accounting for the majority of Covid-19 deaths for a much longer period (see here).
From 14th August through to September 10th there were 208 Covid-19 deaths registered in Scotland. Of these the unvaccinated accounted for 41 deaths, the partly vaccinated (who may have actually had two doses but not have been counted as such due to receiving the second dose being less than 14 days prior to their death) accounted for 9 deaths, and the fully vaccinated accounted for 158 deaths.
This means that the unvaccinated account for just 19.7% of all Covid-19 deaths since August 14th 2021, whilst the vaccinated population account for 80.3% of all deaths since the same date, with the fully vaccinated accounting for 76% of the deaths.
Explosive! Public Health Data: 80% Of Covid-19 Deaths In August Were Vaccinated People.
Public Health Scotland attempt to show that this is expected and that the vaccines are actually saving lives by presenting an age-standardised mortality rate per 100,000 people by vaccination status. However, the flaw in this is that people are not born with Covid-19 because it is an infectious disease, therefore the real mortality-rate should be based on the outcome of the number of confirmed infections.
By taking the number of infections to have occurred in the week beginning 21st August, and compare them against the number of deaths occurring the week beginning 4th September, allowing two weeks between infection and death, we can estimate the actual mortality-rate.
There were 15,639 infections among the unvaccinated the week beginning 21st August, and 13 deaths among the unvaccinated the week beginning 4th September. Therefore, the case-fatality rate among the unvaccinated is 0.08%.
Whilst there were 14,527 infections among the fully vaccinated the week beginning 21st August, and 56 deaths among the fully vaccinated the week beginning 4th September. Therefore, the case-fatality rate among the fully vaccinated is 0.4%.
This suggests that the Covid-19 vaccines increase the risk of death by 400%, rather than reduce the risk of death by the 95% claimed.
These numbers suggest that the Covid-19 vaccines do not work, make the recipient worse, and that the United Kingdom has once very turbulent, dark winter ahead.
Source: TheExpose.uk
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/bhakdiburkhardt-pathology-results
Bhakdi/Burkhardt pathology results show 93% of people who died after being vaccinated were killed by the vaccine
The vaccine was implicated in 93% of the deaths in the patients they examined. What's troubling is the coroner didn't implicate the vaccine in any of those deaths.
 |
Summary
The vaccines are bad news. Fifteen bodies were examined (all died from 7 days to 6 months after vaccination; ages 28 to 95). The coroner or the public prosecutor didn’t associate the vaccine as the cause of death in any of the cases. However, further examination revealed that the vaccine was implicated in the deaths of 14 of the 15 cases. The most attacked organ was the heart (in all of the people who died), but other organs were attacked as well. The implications are potentially enormous resulting in millions of deaths. The vaccines should be immediately halted.
No need to worry. It is doubtful that anything will happen because the work wasn’t published in a peer-reviewed journal so will be ignored by the scientific community. That’s just the way it works.
The paper
I got an email recently from Mike Yeadon, former VP of Pfizer, who urged me to check out this video. He wrote me this email on 12/24/21:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fHIT55iM4Zv9/
Steve,
This is about the worst 15min I’ve ever seen.
Mass covid19 vaccination is leading to mass murder.
Mike
The video references this paper, posted on December 10, 2021, On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination by Sucharit Bhakdi, MD and Arne Burkhardt, MD. It has been getting a lot of attention lately.
Check out the number of likes and retweets… just in the first 3 hours!!!!
The authors did an autopsy in 15 patients who died (from 7 days to 6 months) after receiving the COVID vaccine. These were all cases where the coroner ruled as NOT being caused by the vaccine.
They discovered that in 14 of the 15 patients there was widespread evidence of the body attacking itself, something that is never seen before. The heart was attacked in all 14 cases.
A number of salient aspects dominated in all affected tissues of all cases:
inflammatory events in small blood vessels (endotheliitis), characterized by an abundance of T-lymphocytes and sequestered, dead endothelial cells within the vessel lumen;
the extensive perivascular accumulation of T-lymphocytes;
a massive lymphocytic infiltration of surrounding non-lymphatic organs or tissue with T-lymphocytes.
Lymphocytic infiltration occasionally occurred in combination with intense lymphocytic activation and follicle formation. Where these were present, they were usually accompanied by tissue destruction.
Here's the video presentation of the results.
VAERS as well as other independent studies (e.g., see this vaccine injury paper) shows the vaccines are killing people and that cardiac events were highly elevated. This study is consistent with those results.
This work independently validates the analysis of Peter Schimacher who showed a minimum of 30% to 40% of the deaths after vaccine were caused by the vaccine.
Reactions from a level-headed scientist (name withheld to protect him from attack)
If the autopsy findings are confirmed by other pathologists with additional samples, and if they are combined with the findings of Dr. Hoffe (>60% inoculant recipients have elevated D-dimer tests and evidence of clotting) and Dr. Cole (increase in cancers after inoculation, including twenty-fold increase in uterine cancer), we are seeing a disaster of unimaginable proportions. The conclusion (if supported by further data) is that essentially EVERY inoculant recipient suffers damage, with more damage after each shot. Given the seriousness of the types of damage (autoimmune diseases, cancer, re-emergent dormant infections, clotting/strokes, cardiac damage, etc.), these effects will translate into lifespan reduction, which should be counted as deaths from the inoculations. So, in the USA, where ~200M people have been fully inoculated, the number of deaths will not be the 10,000 or so reported in VAERS, or the 150,000+ scaled-up deaths from VAERS, but could be closer to tens of millions when the inoculation effects play out!
What the above three findings (Burkhart, Hoffe, Cole, and I suspect many others who have not yet come forward) show is that the post-inoculation effects are not rare events (as reported by the media-gov't), but are in actuality frequent events. They may be, in fact, universal, with the severity and damage different for each recipient.
The question in my mind is whether it is possible to reverse these inoculation-based adverse events. Can the innate immune system be fully restored? Can the micro clotting be reversed? Can the autoimmunity be reversed? I have seen a wide spectrum of opinions on whether this is possible, none of which is overly convincing.
Are we headed for the situation where the ~30% unvaxxed will be devoting their lives to operating whatever is left of the economic infrastructure and serving as caretakers for the vaxxed?
I realize the above sounds extreme, and maybe when more data are gathered from myriad credible sources the results and conclusions may change, but right now the above data seem to synchronize with the demonstrated underlying mechanisms of damage. Additionally, we seem to be doubling down on inoculations, with fourth booster being proposed for Israel, and UK suggesting quarterly boosters.
Dr. Ryan Cole’s reaction
Background of two of the scientists behind the study
Dr. Bhakdi has spent his life practicing, teaching and researching medical microbiology and infectious diseases. He chaired the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany, from 1990 until his retirement in 2012. He has published over 300 research articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology and parasitology, and served from 1990 to 2012 as Editor-in-Chief of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, one of the first scientific journals of this field that was founded by Robert Koch in 1887.
Dr. Arne Burkhardt is a pathologist who has taught at the Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen. He was invited for visiting professorships/study visits in Japan (Nihon University), the United States (Brookhaven National Institute), Korea, Sweden, Malaysia and Turkey. He headed the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen for 18 years. Subsequently, he worked as an independent practicing pathologist with consulting contracts with laboratories in the US. Burkhardt has published more than 150 scientific articles in German and international scientific journals as well as contributions to handbooks in German, English and Japanese. Over many years he has audited and certified institutes of pathology in Germany.
Subscribe to Steve Kirsch's newsletter
I write about COVID vaccine safety and efficacy, corruption, censorship, mandates, masking, and early treatments. America is being misled by formerly trusted authorities.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/pandemic-of-the-unvaccinated
Pandemic of the unvaccinated?
No way. Remember the Harvard study showed the more you vaccinate, the higher the cases. Here's more proof.
|
Multiple studies (such as the Harvard study) showed the more you vaccinate, the worse it gets. This is why mandating vaccination drives us deeper into a hole.
You can see it for yourself: vaccination drives hospital admissions.
For more info, see the full Analysis by Joel Smalley
My survey of healthcare providers
Also, see my survey of healthcare providers where I asked the same question. Click the image below to get the full PDF, including what they said about myocarditis rates. In short, we’ve been lied to. Here are just two of the questions. :
Subscribe to Steve Kirsch's newsletter
I write about COVID vaccine safety and efficacy, corruption, censorship, mandates, masking, and early treatments. America is being misled by formerly trusted authorities.
Hospitalisations by COVID-19 vaccination status
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust: 06-Sep-20 to 12-Dec-21
 |
1. Main points
For all ages, 18+ years, as COVID-19 admissions rose between 06-Sep-20 and 31-Jan-21, and between 06-Jun-21 and 31-Oct-21, total admissions fell, suggesting COVID-19 was not instrumental on NHS pressure.
The low point of the downward trend in admissions occurs in the week in which COVID-19 mass vaccinations begin.
The rise in weekly admissions is concomitant with the rise in vaccinations and only abates when adult vaccinations also abate.
The weekly variation in admissions for all ages, 18+ years, is more strongly correlated with patients vaccinated prior to admission than unvaccinated patients, both before and after the midpoint of vaccination rates.
It is strongly suggested that COVID-19 vaccinations drive the increase in hospital admissions throughout the period of observation, exceeding hospital bed capacity by 9k beds, roughly 272 beds per week, or 33% of total capacity.
The timing and magnitude of pressure caused by vaccinations varies by age group, health characteristics and vaccination timetable.
None of the age groups shows evidence of a reduction in hospital admissions during periods of COVID prevalence except at the end of the observation period which is just as likely to be the result of a cessation of vaccinations and/or survivorship bias, as it is protection against COVID.
2.Methods
Despite the fact that the government keeps telling us that coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccinations are intended to “save the NHS”, i.e. relieve demand on capacity, and “save lives”, it is challenging to prove this because of the abject lack of analysis and publicly available data on overall hospital admissions and underlying data on deaths by vaccination status, from the ONS and UKHSA.
To overcome this challenge, I have put in over 50 Freedom of Information requests to those organisations and a number of NHS Trusts.
Only one NHS Trust (Gloucestershire) was apparently willing and able to provide me with the information I requested, daily hospital admissions by age with date of first COVID-19 vaccination1.
From this data, I was able to construct weekly timeseries of hospital admissions between 06-Sep-20 and 12-Dec-21, grouped by age ranges and real vaccination status (simply vaccinated or unvaccinated at the time of admission).
I performed a relative trend analysis for each age group and a correlation between the weekly change in total admissions and vaccinated/unvaccinated admissions to estimate if vaccination had an effect on overall hospital admissions.
According to the ONS2:
The vaccination roll-out was also prioritised by health status of individuals, with the extremely clinically vulnerable and those with underlying health conditions being vaccinated earlier than other people in their age group. In addition, frontline health and social care workers, who could have a higher occupational risk, were also prioritised for vaccination.
These factors might influence the analysis which is also potentially affected by changes over time such as in COVID-19 infection levels, different dominant variants, differing levels of immunity from prior infection and seasonality.
That said, in analysing the data across periods where COVID-19 (variants) were prevalent and not, and taking into consideration the other potential confounders, I believe the conclusions drawn from the analysis are reliable and robust.
The analysis demonstrates the impact on hospital admissions during COVID-19 outbreaks, during periods when there is little or no COVID-19, when vaccination rates are low and climbing and when they are high and at a relatively steady state.
Estimating vaccine effectiveness is challenging when vaccination status is not allocated at random, as factors that vary between the vaccination status groups and over time need to be accounted for to determine the causal impact of vaccines on hospital admissions.
Nonetheless, this analysis gives a simple, fast measure of how hospital admission rates vary by vaccination status, and can indicate whether vaccines are likely to be successful in reducing pressure on the NHS.
The vaccination status is binary - either the patient had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine prior to admission or they had not.
3.Hospital admission rates by vaccination status, all ages over 18 years
The hospital admissions involving coronavirus (COVID) and non-COVID by vaccination status group for all admissions aged 18 years and over, between 20-Dec-20 and 12-Dec-21 (52 weeks) are shown in Table 1.
Of the 58k total admissions, roughly half were vaccinated prior to admission and only 5% of admissions were “with” COVID.
Inevitably, given the very low rate of COVID admissions, it is not possible to analyse the effectiveness of the COVID vaccine directly using this metric. However, if the vaccine was responsible for the very small number of COVID admissions, this should also result in “normal” admission levels at worst (unless, of course, the vaccine itself was responsible for causing non-COVID admissions).
There was no data available on normal admissions but bed occupancy has been consistently between 820 and 890 for this hospital and age group over the years, regardless of the time of year. The admissions are equivalent to around 1,100 each week on average, well in excess of normal occupancy which is also not far off maximum capacity.
Between 20-Dec-20 and 01-Aug-21 (33 weeks), the period when admissions were rising, the expected admissions (as a function of normal bed capacity and an arbitrary 1-week average stay) is 27k (Table 2). The actual number of admissions is 36k, an excess of around 272 per week on average, or 33% of capacity. This represents the number of excess discharges the hospital would have to make each week to maintain bed capacity.
According to Table 3, the average weekly increase in total admissions is almost 9 per week, every week between 27-Dec-20 and 01-Aug-21 (33 weeks) before it plateaus (and eventually recedes again).
This net increase is a function of a 14 admissions decrease in the unvaccinated relative to a 23 admissions increase in the vaccinated.
There are two competing hypotheses to explain the total increase.
The main hypothesis (mine) is that the vaccine (which is known to cause some severe adverse reactions that lead to hospitalisation)3 causes more non-COVID hospitalisations than potential COVID hospitalisations mitigated.
The alternative hypothesis is that the unvaccinated admissions do not decrease at the same rate as the vaccinated admissions increase due to the “unhealthy unvaccinated” effect, i.e. the seriously ill are too ill to be vaccinated or refuse if they are significantly moribund.
Notwithstanding the prescience required by the patient to fit the second hypothesis, this is obviously a stark contradiction to the statement above quoted from the ONS, whereby the critically ill and those with other underlying health conditions are actually prioritised for vaccination.
Nevertheless, we can put these hypotheses to a further test by looking at the correlations between total admissions and admissions by vaccination status.
As we can see from Figure 2, the correlations between vaccinated admissions and total admissions are about twice as strong as the correlations between total admissions and unvaccinated admissions for all the over 18s. This demonstrates that vaccinated admissions have a stronger relationship with the weekly variation of all admissions than unvaccinated admissions.
Looking at Figure 3, we can see that up until the end of March the vaccinated admission rate exceeds the population vaccination rate. This is consistent with the ONS statement that the clinically vulnerable are prioritised for vaccination. It appears that this results in an increase in hospital admissions, probably due to the vaccine itself as expected. It is plausible that the sustained increase in hospitalisations beyond March is simply due to a longer delay between vaccination and adverse event requiring hospitalisation in some of the vaccinated patients.
The trend analysis and correlation analysis together strongly suggest that vaccinated admissions are driving total admissions. Since admissions are rising for most of the period under study, it is apparent that COVID vaccinations are responsible for increased admissions, regardless of the incidence of COVID-19, the level of vaccination or the rate of vaccination.
4.Hospital admission rates by vaccination status, ages 18-39 years
Looking at Figure 4, we observe that vaccinated admissions did not start in earnest until 10-Jan-21 for patients aged between 18 and 39 years old. The mid point of vaccinations was on 06-Jun-21 which which is a few weeks after admissions have ceased to rise.
According to Figure 5, the vaccinated admission rate runs slightly below the population vaccination rate until the end of April with a couple of spikes. This might suggest that the clinically vulnerable in this age group were less likely to be hospitalised by the vaccine than all ages over 18 years.
However, overall we observe the same relative impact on total admissions that appears to be driven by the vaccinated patients (Table 4) with an average increase in admissions of 1.5 patients every week, resulting in an excess demand of 33% of normal bed capacity. Overall, only 33% of admissions were in the vaccinated.
The correlation plots (Figure 6) reveal that the vaccinated admissions are twice as closely related to total admissions than the unvaccinated in the first half of mass vaccination. This would be consistent with the expectation that the clinically vulnerable should be more susceptible to hospitalisation due to adverse reaction to the vaccine.
After the midpoint, the unvaccinated, although not strongly correlated in absolute terms are three to four times more closely correlated than the vaccinated, suggesting that the healthy patients in this age group are no longer affected by the vaccine, as we would expect.
5.Hospital admission rates by vaccination status, ages 40-49 years
Looking at Figure 7, we observe that vaccinated admissions did not start in earnest until 03-Jan-21 for patients aged between 40 and 49 years old. The mid point of vaccinations was on 18-Apr-21.
In contrast to the 18-39 year olds, we see a more significant rise admissions concomitant with the rise in vaccinated admissions.
According to Figure 8, the vaccinated admission rate runs well above the population vaccination rate until the end of April. This is consistent with the concomitant rise in admissions and might suggest that the clinically vulnerable in this age group were unsurprisingly more likely to be hospitalised by the vaccine than the 18-39 year olds.
After April, the admission rate trend is neutral, punctuated by some wild weekly variations which might signify that those being hospitalised may well have been hospitalised soon anyway.
Over the whole period between 03-Jan-21 and 01-Aug-21 (Table 5), there is a very modestly positive average weekly increase in overall admissions.
However, since the age group typically has relatively very few admissions, in percentage terms it actually represents a substantial increase over expectations with an excess demand of 63% of normal bed capacity. Overall, 59% of admissions were in the vaccinated which is higher than the average rate of vaccination in the population over the same period of just 53%.
The correlation plots (Figure 9) confirm the trend analysis and overall statistics. They reveal that the vaccinated admissions are substantially more highly correlated to total admissions than the unvaccinated in the first half of mass vaccination and almost twice has correlated afterwards as well.
It is clear that vaccinated admissions are driving the rise and variation in admissions for this age group in spite of the population not being predominantly vaccinated during the period.
6.Hospital admission rates by vaccination status, ages 50-69 years
Looking at Figure 10, we observe that vaccinated admissions start in earnest on 03-Jan-21 for patients aged between 50 and 69 years old. The mid point of vaccinations was on 07-Mar-21.
In contrast to the 40-49 year olds, we see a more modest rise in admissions for a few weeks after vaccinations start, followed by a sharp drop even as vaccinations continue, followed again by a more sustained rise through to mid-May.
According to Figure 11, the vaccinated admission rate runs exactly on the vaccinated population rate for the first five weeks. This is probably due to Healthcare workers being prioritised for this age group before the clinically vulnerable.
After Jan, the vaccinated admission rate runs consistently above the population rate until the end of March when over 70% of the population in this age group has been vaccinated.
Similarly to the 40-49 year olds, this is consistent with the concomitant rise in admissions and might suggest that the clinically vulnerable in this age group were unsurprisingly more likely to be hospitalised by the vaccine in the first few weeks after vaccination, followed progressively less by the less and less vulnerable.
Over the whole period between 03-Jan-21 and 01-Aug-21 (Table 6), there is a substantially positive average weekly increase in overall admissions.
In percentage terms it represents an increase over expectations of 35% of normal bed capacity. Overall, 68.5% of admissions were in the vaccinated which is almost exactly the same as the background population rate.
The correlation plots (Figure 12) confirm the trend analysis and overall statistics. They reveal that there is little correlation between total admissions and either vaccinated admissions or unvaccinated admissions up to the midpoint of mass vaccination.
However, after the midpoint, unvaccinated admissions continue to show little correlation, whereas vaccinated admissions are strongly correlated with a relationship that is more than five times stronger.
It is clear that vaccinated admissions are driving the rise and variation in admissions for this age group after the healthcare workers have been vaccinated.
7.Hospital admission rates by vaccination status, ages 70 years and over
Looking at Figure 13, we observe that vaccinated admissions start in earnest on 20-Dec-20 for patients aged 70 years and over. The mid point of vaccinations was on 24-Jan-21.
In contrast to the younger age groups, we do not see a rise in total admissions concomitant with a rise in vaccinated admissions for the first few weeks when the oldest and frailest are being vaccinated. The concomitant rise that we have observed in all the other age groups does not start until the midpoint of vaccinations on 24-Jan-21 when all of the oldest and frailest have been vaccinated.
According to Figure 14, the vaccinated admission rate does not significantly deviate from the vaccinated population rate for the first five or six weeks before running substantially below it.
This might suggest that the vaccine had no impact on the oldest and frailest. In other words, those hospitalised were going to be so, vaccinated or not.
Thereafter, the plausible explanation given to me by one of my practicing clinician colleagues why the vaccinated admission rate tapers more rapidly than the background population rate is perhaps that those who might previously have been hospitalised unfortunately no longer made it that far. This might also explain why all admissions fall precipitously below expected levels in October, after boosters are given and fits with my previous analyses on deaths, e.g.
Over the whole period between 03-Jan-21 and 01-Aug-21 (Table 6), there is a substantially positive average weekly increase in overall admissions.
In percentage terms it represents an increase over expectations of 32% of normal bed capacity which might now suggest that my estimate of 7 days hospital duration was too high and it is actually closer to 5 days. Overall, 72% of admissions were in the vaccinated which is substantially less than the average population rate for the period of 82%.
The correlation plots (Figure 15) confirm the trend analysis, that before the midpoint where it is mainly the 80+ year olds being vaccinated, there is little difference in the vaccination status in terms of driving the variability in admission rates.
However, after the midpoint, unvaccinated admissions correlation falls substantially, whereas vaccinated admissions remain strong, up to four times higher.
Once again, it is apparent that vaccinated admissions are driving the rise and variation in admissions for this age group after the the oldest and most frail have been vaccinated.
The analysis of the admission trends and correlations in weekly variability show that timing of vaccination roll out, age and health status affect hospital admission rates and timings just as vaccination status does.
However, it is also clear that taking these variables into consideration, plausible explanations can be given to explain the differences.
The ultimate conclusion is the same across all age groups as it was for the aggregate data - there is substantial evidence showing that COVID vaccinations are the main driver of changes in overall hospital admissions. Since inception, admissions are higher than expected for several months, strongly suggesting that the vaccines cause more hospitalisations than they mitigate.
8.Glossary
Coronaviruses
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines coronaviruses as "a large family of viruses that are known to cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)". Between 2001 and 2018, there were 12 deaths in England and Wales because of a coronavirus infection, with a further 13 deaths mentioning the virus as a contributory factor on the death certificate.
Coronavirus (COVID-19)
COVID-19 refers to the "coronavirus disease 2019" and is a disease that can affect the lungs and airways. It is caused by a type of coronavirus. Further information is available from the WHO.
Hospitalisations involving COVID-19
Hospitalisations as published on the UK Coronavirus Dashboard.
Data
In the interest of full transparency, a copy of the data, analysis tables and figures (and more besides) is available here.
9.Strengths and limitations
This analysis does not rely on biased or misleading vaccination classifications whereby vaccinated patients would be classified as unvaccinated within a certain number of weeks of being vaccinated or simply censored from the data. Nor does it only examine COVID endpoints rather than all endpoints and consider “fully vaccinated” as the only important outcome.
Unvaccinated also includes unknown vaccination status, i.e. where the patient record could not be matched to the National Immunisation Status database and/or was not known to the hospital by some other means.
10. Acknowledgement
I would like to publicly acknowledge and thank the FOI Team and anyone else at Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust for the effort put into putting the data together and delivering it within the statutory limit.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/covid_vaccination_status_of_hosp_9
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsinvolvingcovid19byvaccinationstatusengland/deathsoccurringbetween1januaryand31october2021
https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports
Subscribe to COVID Facts - Challenge the Narrative
Making sense of COVID using empirical data analaysis and modelling.
https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/40-places-where-covid-shots-have
40 Places Where Covid Shots Have Failed To Stop The Spread
24 countries and 16 states where cases reached new all-time highs after vaccination roll outs.
 |
|
One of the most surreal aspects of the global campaign to force the world into taking these experimental mRNA-vaccines is the sheer number of places where Covid-19 cases have reached new all-time highs after the introduction of these leaky vaccinations. Wasn’t the point of vaccination to slow the spread?
Even Bill Gates said in July 2020 that the “key goal” of these vaccinations is to “stop the transmission” in order to “get the immunity levels up so you get almost no infection going on whatsoever.” While the vaccines were being sold to the American people, Joe Biden said, “you are not going to get covid if you have these vaccinations.” The CDC Director, Rochelle Walensky said, “vaccinated people don’t carry the virus and don’t get sick.” And, Anthony Fauci said, “when people are vaccinated they can feel safe that they are not going to get infected.”
When did the goal of vaccinations cease to be prevention of infection and transmission? Wasn’t protection from infection and transmission always the goal of other vaccination programs such as polio, measles, and mumps? So let’s take a moment to explore how these covid shots have led to a record rise of cases in 40 places around the world, beginning with the Scandinavian countries:
Iceland, Finland, Denmark, and Norway are all at all-time highs in cases even though we are only beginning to enter the winter season when coronavirus cases, hospitalizations, and deaths tend to rise in the northern hemisphere. This seasonality also known as the “flu season” is due to changes in temperature, humidity, ventilation, sterilizing UV sunlight, and population-scale vitamin D levels. But this record increase in cases is also happening in lower latitude European nations such as:
As you can see, despite mass vaccination campaigns, mask mandates, and vaccine passports rolling out across many European nations, cases are now at their highest levels yet, and it is only the start of the winter flu season. This phenomenon is not exclusive to Europe and has also taken place in Asia:
Northern-Asian nations like Japan and South Korea have seen record numbers of cases since vaccination, but so have Southern-Asian nations including; Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines, and Vietnam. This rise in cases after vaccination has also inflicted the two island-nations of, Australia and New Zealand, which were previously hailed by the pro-lockdown, pro-vaccine mandate corporate media as “zero-covid” successes:
Although, to many independent scientists, physicians, and journalist, this rise in cases in Australia and New Zealand was an inevitable outcome due to the fact that these non-sterilizing vaccines do not stop infection or transmission. Now, moving on to the United States, many of the southern states have already reached new all-time highs in cases despite the roll out of the vaccination program:
As this data shows, despite the mass vaccination campaign, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Kentucky have all experienced their highest levels of cases yet between the months of July and October 2021. Furthermore, many of these southern states also experienced their highest levels of hospitalization and deaths during these same months. Interestingly, even Washington and Oregon, in the Pacific Northwest had their worst months (cases, hospitalizations, and deaths) yet, and are now entering the winter flu season at case levels near their 2020 peaks:
The vaccination campaign also failed to slow the spread on the islands of Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands which all saw record outbreaks after mass vaccination:
Now, as we approach the winter season, many Northern states are already at all-time high case loads, and will undoubtedly have their worse covid season yet if current trends continue. Especially, if the big pharma controlled corporate media and bought and paid for public health officials continue to only prioritize profits for vaccine makers rather than focusing efforts on safe and effective early treatment options such as monoclonal antibodies:
In summary, if the goal of vaccination is to slow the spread, as Bill Gates stated in 2020, and as has always been the goal of vaccination, then these vaccinations are completely failing all around the world. Now, big pharma controlled public health officials continue to claim that leaky vaccines are superior to no vaccines, but independent vaccine makers and scientists like Professor Luc Montagnier, Dr. Robert Malone, and Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche continue to warn that mass vaccinating with leaky vaccines are an incredibly dangerous experiment that can promote the evolution of more virulent pathogens. As documented by this 2015 NIH-funded study, “imperfect vaccination can enhance the transmission of highly virulent pathogens."
Additionally, it is completely non-sensical and a violation of the Nuremberg Code to coerce or force populations to take these experimental mRNA vaccines. This argument is further strengthened by the fact that these shots do not prevent infection or transmission. Therefore, vaccine passports do not serve any public health purpose, but they are an ideal tool of authoritarian tyrants looking for increased top-down control over human rights, freedoms, and liberties. Moreover, big pharma controlled government officials continue to ignore the fact that these experimental gene-therapy shots have been linked to more adverse events and deaths than all other vaccines combined over the last thirty years. If the vaccine does not provide personal immunity then the vaccine does not provide herd immunity. On the other hand, the only people guaranteed immunity in this entire pharma-fascist takeover of society, are the vaccine manufacturers themselves.
You can also find me on telegram, rumble, and gab.
*All data and charts from ourworldindata.org and nytimes.com.
THE DOWNLOAD:
Federal Prison Study Finds Vaccinated Just As Infectious As Unvaccinated: The study found that vaccinated prisoners were just as infectious as unvaccinated prisoners and there was no difference in the length of sickness between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. "During a high-transmission outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in a prison setting, we failed to find different durations of RT-PCR positivity, Ct values, or durations of viral culture positivity in fully vaccinated persons compared with persons who were not fully vaccinated." Read More.
Totalitarianism and the Five Stages of Dehumanization: The first step of dehumanization is the creation and political instrumentalization of fear. The second step is soft exclusion. The third is dehumanization through documented justification. The fourth is hard exclusion and the fifth is extermination. All totalitarian efforts always end on the dustheap of history. This one will be no exception. Read More.
Documents Show Bill Gates Has Given $319 Million to Media Outlets: Recipients of this cash include many of America’s most important news outlets, including CNN, NBC, NPR, PBS and The Atlantic. Gates also sponsors a myriad of influential foreign organizations, including the BBC, The Guardian, The Financial Times and The Daily Telegraph in the United Kingdom; prominent European newspapers such as Le Monde (France), Der Spiegel (Germany) and El País (Spain); as well as big global broadcasters like Al-Jazeera. Read More.
FDA Wants To Fully Release Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Data In 2076: The FDA has asked a federal judge to make the public wait until the year 2076 to disclose all of the data and information it relied upon to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. It wants 55 years to produce this information to the public. Everyone who wants to get vaccinated and boosted should be free to do so. But nobody should be coerced by the government to partake in any medical procedure. Certainly not one where the government wants to hide the full information relied upon for its licensure until the year 2076! Read more.
RFK Jr.’s ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ Hits Bookstores Today: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s highly anticipated book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” hits bookstores today. The New York Times bestselling author’s latest work details how Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates and their cohorts used their control of media outlets, scientific journals, key government and quasi-governmental agencies, and influential scientists and physicians to flood the public with fearful propaganda about COVID-19 virulence and pathogenesis, and to muzzle debate and ruthlessly censor dissent. Read more.
Subscribe to Kanekoa's Newsletter
A newsletter providing independent, fact-based reporting on COVID-19 and current events.
https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/alex-berenson-tells-joe-rogan-over-b43
Alex Berenson Tells Joe Rogan: 'Over 70% of COVID-19 Deaths in England Were Fully Vaccinated In September'
New York Times best selling author, Alex Berenson, appeared on “The Joe Rogan Experience” to discuss Public Health England's latest data on the COVID vaccines.
|
|
In a podcast episode released last Tuesday, New York Times best-selling author, Alex Berenson, who was permanently suspended from Twitter, appeared on “The Joe Rogan Experience” to discuss the latest reports on the COVID vaccines out of the UK.
Berenson showed Rogan a report entitled “COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report Week 38” from Public Health England (PHE), which is equivalent to the Center for Disease Control in the United States. He pointed to the fact that the British Government’s own data shows the majority of COVID cases and deaths occurred in the fully vaccinated during the month of September, or more specifically, between the weeks of 34 and 37 2021. Berenson said:
“I have to keep saying this to people because they almost don’t believe it. In the UK, more than 70% of the people who die now from COVID are fully vaccinated.”
According to Table 4 from the PHE Report, during the month of September, there were a total of 3,158 COVID deaths in England. PHE defines deaths as occurring “within 28 days of a positive specimen (COVID-19 test) or COVID-19 reported on death certificate”. And, they define fully vaccinated as “14-days or more after the second dose of a 2-dose vaccine”. In total, 2,284 of the 3,158 total COVID deaths in England for the month of September were fully vaccinated. In other words, 72.32% of COVID-19 deaths in England during September were fully vaccinated.
Berenson continued, “I’m going to keep saying it because nobody believes it, but the numbers are there in the government documents. They are not a secret. It’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s not somebody saying I heard this from my cousin. It’s in British government documents.”
“What I want everyone to see,” he said. “Is that the vast majority of people in Britain who died in September were fully vaccinated. Those are the numbers.” Berenson also discussed England’s “case rates by vaccination status” featured in Table 2 of the same PHE Report. Berenson said:
“This is UK Government data and what it says is that the idea that it is a ‘pandemic of the unvaccinated’ is a total lie. You are more likely to become sick if you are vaccinated than if you are not if you are older than 40.”
According to Table 2, during September, there were a total of 256,686 cases recorded for people above the age of 40. In total, 205,197 of the 256,686 cases in England during September were fully vaccinated. More specifically, 79.94% of the COVID-19 cases in England above the age of 40 during September were fully vaccinated. Furthermore, for those 40 and older, the average rate of COVID-19 per 100,000 was higher in the fully vaccinated at 724 per 100,000 compared to the unvaccinated at 520 per 100,000. This means in England during the month of September, if you were 40 or older, you were more likely to catch COVID-19 if you were vaccinated, rather than if you were unvaccinated.
The rate of cases per 100,000 classified by age group and vaccination status can be better visualized with Figure 2 from the same PHE Report. Note, the 40 and older age groups, where the fully vaccinated (blue) have a higher chance of catching COVID-19 than the unvaccinated (pink). Now, on the other hand, for those 39 and below, according to this data, the unvaccinated have a higher chance of contracting COVID-19, but considering the 10,000-fold difference in mortality rates between the old and the young, high COVID-19 rates in people under the age of 40 is exponentially less of a risk of hospitalization and death compared to high COVID-19 rates among the elderly. For example, according to the UK Government, between March 2020 and January 2021, 436 of 80,820 total COVID-19 deaths were 39 and below, representing half of one percent of the countries deaths, while the median age of death was 82 and the mean age of death was 80.
Alex Berenson came on the “Joe Rogan Experience” as it is now established fact across the medical community that these vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission. They are by definition “leaky vaccines”. In other words, they are vaccines that lower the chance of severe illness but still allow for infection and transmission of the virus. The real revelations here are the extent of cases and deaths occurring in the fully vaccinated in England during the month of September. How is it possible that public health officials and media pundits in the United States continue to call it a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” when 72.32% of COVID deaths in England occurred in the fully vaccinated last month? Why is no one in the mainstream media acknowledging the United Kingdom’s publicly available data showing for the 40 and older age groups, 79.94% of COVID-19 cases in England during September were fully vaccinated?
There is simply no way that England has completely contradictory data to the United States with the same virus and vaccines. Similar patterns to Public Health England’s data can be found in other countries around the world. For example, data from Israel, Iceland, and Singapore also show the majority of COVID cases in the fully vaccinated. In summary, U.S. public health and political officials with the help of corporate media outlets are lying, manipulating, and deceiving the American public. Meanwhile, an independent journalist like Alex Berenson will continue to seek out publicly available data from foreign nations to hold U.S. officials accountable.
In contrast, the fact-checkers at Reuters, the Associated Press, and the New York Times will debunk these statements by saying that the majority of people over the age of 40 are fully vaccinated in England, therefore it is to be expected that the majority of COVID-19 deaths would be fully vaccinated. Which does not change the fact that 72.32% of COVID deaths in England last month were fully vaccinated. Nor, does it debunk the fact that, if you are above the age of 40, you are more likely to catch COVID-19 if you are vaccinated rather than if you are unvaccinated according to this report from Public Health England.
You can find these video clips and more on my telegram, rumble, and gab accounts.
THE RUNDOWN:
YouTube Bans All Content Stating ‘Vaccines Are Ineffective Or Dangerous’: YouTube has expanded its medical misinformation policies with new guidelines targeting content that “falsely alleges that approved vaccines are dangerous and cause chronic health effects, claims that vaccines do not reduce transmission or contraction of the disease, or contains misinformation on the substances contained in vaccines will be removed.” Read More.
Peer-Reviewed Study: ‘COVID Shot More Likely To Kill Children Than Virus’: The study begins by discussing various stats in the pandemic, including how many people in the United States reportedly died from the disease, how many have been inoculated, and how many people have died following the shot according to the CDC’s VAERS database. The study boldly claims that “there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic.” Read more.
Pfizer CEO: “Normal Life” Won’t Return Without Regular COVID Vaccinations: Albert Bourla, the CEO of the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, normal life will return within a year, but not for those who don’t have regular COVID-19 vaccinations. Bourla said that the “most likely scenario” was “annual re-vaccinations” due to the emergence of “new variants.” This underscores how a two-tier society is being created tying a pharmaceutical product to people’s ability to work, travel, and take part in society. Read more.
Harvard Researcher: Increases In COVID Are Unrelated To Levels of Vaccination: A new study published in the European Journal of Epidemiology found increases in COVID are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States. In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with a higher percentage of the population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people. Read more.
12,000 Doctors And Scientist Sign Declaration Claiming Crimes Against Humanity: More than 12,000 Doctors and Scientists have signed the Rome Declaration accusing public policymakers of crimes against humanity for preventing physicians from treating their COVID-19 patients, as a result of barriers put up by pharmacies, hospitals, and public health agencies, rendering the vast majority of healthcare providers helpless to protect their patients in the face of disease. Read more.
UK GOVERNMENT EXPECTS DOUBLE VACCINATED TO BE IN HOSPITAL WITH COVID
IN UK YOU HAVE 2X RISK OF "GETTING COVID" IF YOU HAVE BEEN JABBED & MORE LIKELY TO DIE IN SCOTLAND
COVID VACCINES AND THE JONESTOWN MASSACRE
This video shows a report from the UK that over 75% of the people dying have been triple-jabbed.
Alex Jones Sharp INCREASE of Transmission and DEATH After Covid Vaccines
I'm pasting one of Steve Kirsch's blog posts below, highlighted. To see the original and the comments, click on this link:
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/how-rare-are-vaccine-side-effects?utm_source=url
How rare are vaccine side effects? Not very rare at all.
The CDC and Wall St. Journal both say serious side effects from the COVID vaccines are extremely rare. They are lying. But now we have unassailable proof from the Israeli government!
|
|
This article, by Wall Street Journal staff writer Jenny Strasburg (see Covid-19 Vaccines Were Deadly in Rare Cases. Governments Are Now Weighing Compensation) says:
Serious side effects so far have been very rare—estimated at roughly one to 11 per 100,000 doses for some of the more serious harmful reactions identified by regulators in the most-affected age groups, according to U.S. and European government officials and researchers. They include blood clotting, nervous-system disorders and heart problems, all of which also can be caused by Covid itself.
Similarly, a story in The Epoch Times entitled “US Agencies Quietly Studying Reports of Post-Vaccination Neurological Issues” also revealed that there are some side-effects and they are really rare, but the CDC is studying them. That article says this:
The CDC lists only one adverse event as likely having “a causal relationship” with a vaccine. That’s TTS and the Johnson & Johnson shot.
The CDC and Wall St. Journal are both lying to you. Big time.
The truth is the vaccines are an unmitigated disaster. The most dangerous vaccines in human history. They should be immediately halted.
But the mainstream media is completely silent and totally ignored this study because it goes against the narrative.
Here’s the proof… right from the Israeli Ministry of Health
The latest proof of that comes from the Israeli Ministry of Health who did something that no government agency has ever done before: did a proactive survey of people who got the booster (instead of using a passive surveillance system like everyone else does). This is the only way to get true rate data since you know the denominator.
The reason no government ever did this before is because they knew it would show the vaccines were a disaster. So if they never looked, they can plausibly say, “we had no idea.”
Obviously, something went wrong and the government of Israel did a proactive survey, something all governments in the world should have done at the very start of the vaccination program.
For passive surveillance, you are always estimating underreporting factors.
For active surveillance, no estimates are required. You see the real data. The only thing you don’t get is death data because dead people don’t answer their phone.
In this case, 2,068 people provided answers. Could it be biased? Yup. The results at worst could be over stated by a factor of two. And even with that fudge factor it doesn’t matter because the rates are off the charts.
Here is the original report which you can download from the MOH Telegram channel. Here’s the screenshot in case they remove it:
To get the translated report, just go to this article and click the Read Now button and it will download the PDF. It’s a quick read.
For the info behind the study, read this excellent article by Josh Guetzkow.
Highlights of the Israeli report
0.3% of people reported hospitalization as a result of the adverse event they experienced.
4.5% of respondents reported neurological problems
Nearly 10% of women under age of 54 had disruptions to their menstrual cycle
About 25% of people with pre-existing auto-immune disorders, depression or anxiety reported a worsening of their symptoms following the booster.
I have a great first-hand data point on neuro issues. I know a neurologist group with 20,000 patients. About 1,000 have new or worsened neurological issues after vaccination. So this is a 5% rate vs. the 4.5% in the study.
So that’s a quick sanity check.
Ivermectin is the better treatment option
We have a better option. A recent paper on Ivermectin shows that Ivermectin was far more effective than the vaccine in preventing death. The effect was so strong that the vaccine was rounding error. I’ll be writing more about that tomorrow.
In general, early treatment protocols are the way to go. They always have been. But the CDC is never going to endorse them. Fareed and Tyson have treated 10,000 COVID cases with no deaths as long as the patients promptly showed up for treatment and took the drugs they were given. ZERO deaths. That’s why the CDC ignores it. The pandemic would be over.
Jamal Edwards is dead at 31
Have you noticed? There sure are a lot of young people dropping dead lately.
The causes of death are always murky. The vaccination status is never mentioned.
The autopsies are rarely done, and when they are done, they are typically not done by anyone who knows how to assess a vaccine death. We never hear from the embalmers either.
We just let people die and not ask any questions. Result: more people die and we simply do not want to know the cause of death.
Summary: The vaccines should be stopped now
The Israeli MOH study is just another nail in the coffin for the vaccine. It shows the vaccines are not safe and should be stopped immediately.
The Israeli MOH study confirms numerous other data points (doctor event reporting rates, VAERS, DMED, life insurance company data, telltale blood clots, huge vaccine victim Facebook groups, the Peter Schirmacher study, and a military doctor who is seeing a 1 in 100 rate of myocarditis post vaccine).
https://brownstone.org/articles/16-studies-on-vaccine-efficacy/
44 Studies on Vaccine Efficacy that Raise Doubts on Vaccine Mandates
As some people have now been vaccinated for more than half a year, evidence is pouring in about Covid vaccine efficacy. When evaluating vaccine efficacy, it is important to distinguish between efficacy against infection, symptomatic disease, and transmission versus efficacy against hospitalization and death. For infection and symptomatic disease, the COVID-19 vaccines are not as efficacious as hoped, with immunity gradually waning after a few months. For hospitalization and death, immunity is stronger, lasting for at least six months.
The gestalt of the findings implies that the infection explosion globally that we have been experiencing– post double vaccination in e.g. Israel, UK, US etc. –may be due to the vaccinated spreading Covid as much or more than the unvaccinated.
A natural question to ask is whether vaccines with limited capacity to prevent symptomatic disease may drive the evolution of more virulent strains? In a PLoS Biology article from 2015, Read et al. observed that:
“Conventional wisdom is that natural selection will remove highly lethal pathogens if host death greatly reduces transmission. Vaccines that keep hosts alive but still allow transmission could thus allow very virulent strains to circulate in a population.”
Hence, rather than the unvaccinated putting the vaccinated at risk, it could theoretically be the vaccinated that are putting the unvaccinated at risk, but we have not yet seen any evidence for that.
Here I summarize studies and reports that shed light on vaccine induced immunity against Covid. They highlight the problems with vaccine mandates that are currently threatening the jobs of millions of people. They also raise doubts about the arguments for vaccinating children.
1) Gazit et al. out of Israel showed that “SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13-fold (95% CI, 8-21) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected.” When adjusting for the time of disease/vaccine, there was a 27-fold increased risk (95% CI, 13-57).
2) Ignoring the risk of infection, given that someone was infected, Acharya et al. found “no significant difference in cycle threshold values between vaccinated and unvaccinated, asymptomatic and symptomatic groups infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta.”
3) Riemersma et al. found “no difference in viral loads when comparing unvaccinated individuals to those who have vaccine “breakthrough” infections. Furthermore, individuals with vaccine breakthrough infections frequently test positive with viral loads consistent with the ability to shed infectious viruses.” Results indicate that “if vaccinated individuals become infected with the delta variant, they may be sources of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to others.” They reported “low Ct values (<25) in 212 of 310 fully vaccinated (68%) and 246 of 389 (63%) unvaccinated individuals. Testing a subset of these low-Ct samples revealed infectious SARS-CoV-2 in 15 of 17 specimens (88%) from unvaccinated individuals and 37 of 39 (95%) from vaccinated people.”
4) In a study from Qatar, Chemaitelly et al. reported vaccine efficacy (Pfizer) against severe and fatal disease, with efficacy in the 85-95% range at least until 24 weeks after the second dose. As a contrast, the efficacy against infection waned down to around 30% at 15-19 weeks after the second dose.
5) From Wisconsin, Riemersma et al. reported that vaccinated individuals who get infected with the Delta variant can transmit SARS-CoV-2 to others. They found an elevated viral load in the unvaccinated and vaccinated symptomatic persons (68% and 69% respectively, 158/232 and 156/225). Moreover, in the asymptomatic persons, they uncovered elevated viral loads (29% and 82% respectively) in the unvaccinated and the vaccinated respectively. This suggests that the vaccinated can be infected, harbor, cultivate, and transmit the virus readily and unknowingly.
6) Subramanian reported that “at the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases.” When comparing 2947 counties in the United States, there were slightly less cases in more vaccinated locations. In other words, there is no clear discernable relationship .
7) Chau et al. looked at transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant among vaccinated healthcare workers in Vietnams. Of 69 healthcare workers that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 62 participated in the clinical study, all of whom recovered. For 23 of them, complete-genome sequences were obtained, and all belonged to the Delta variant. “Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020”.
8) In Barnstable, Massachusetts, Brown et al found that among 469 cases of COVID-19, 74% were fully vaccinated, and that “the vaccinated had on average more virus in their nose than the unvaccinated who were infected.”
9) Reporting on a nosocomial hospital outbreak in Finland, Hetemäli et al. observed that “both symptomatic and asymptomatic infections were found among vaccinated health care workers, and secondary transmission occurred from those with symptomatic infections despite use of personal protective equipment.”
10) In a hospital outbreak investigation in Israel, Shitrit et al. observed “high transmissibility of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant among twice vaccinated and masked individuals.” They added that “this suggests some waning of immunity, albeit still providing protection for individuals without comorbidities.”
11) In the UK COVID-19 vaccine Surveillance Report for week #42, it was noted that there is “waning of the N antibody response over time” and “that N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination.” The same report (Table 2, page 13), shows the in the older age groups above 30, the double vaccinated persons have greater infection risk than the unvaccinated, presumably because the latter group include more people with stronger natural immunity from prior Covid disease. As a contrast, the vaccinated people had a lower risk of death than the unvaccinated, across all age groups, indicating that vaccines provide more protection against death than against infection. See also UK PHE reports 43, 44, 45, 46 for similar data.
12) In Israel, Levin et al. “conducted a 6-month longitudinal prospective study involving vaccinated health care workers who were tested monthly for the presence of anti-spike IgG and neutralizing antibodies”. They found that “six months after receipt of the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine, humoral response was substantially decreased, especially among men, among persons 65 years of age or older, and among persons with immunosuppression.”
13) In a study from New York State, Rosenberg et al. reported that “During May 3–July 25, 2021, the overall age-adjusted vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization in New York was relatively stable 89.5%–95.1%). The overall age-adjusted vaccine effectiveness against infection for all New York adults declined from 91.8% to 75.0%.”
14) Suthar et al. noted that “Our data demonstrate a substantial waning of antibody responses and T cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, at 6 months following the second immunization with the BNT162b2 vaccine.”
15) In a study from Umeå University in Sweden, Nordström et al. observed that “vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 against infection waned progressively from 92% (95% CI, 92-93, P<0·001) at day 15-30 to 47% (95% CI, 39-55, P<0·001) at day 121-180, and from day 211 and onwards no effectiveness could be detected (23%; 95% CI, -2-41, P=0·07).”
16) Yahi et al. have reported that “in the case of the Delta variant, neutralizing antibodies have a decreased affinity for the spike protein, whereas facilitating antibodies display a strikingly increased affinity. Thus, antibody dependent enhancement may be a concern for people receiving vaccines based on the original Wuhan strain spike sequence.”
17) Goldberg et al. (BNT162b2 Vaccine in Israel) reported that “immunity against the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 waned in all age groups a few months after receipt of the second dose of vaccine.”
18) Singanayagam et al. examined the transmission and viral load kinetics in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals with mild delta variant infection in the community. They found that (in 602 community contacts (identified via the UK contract-tracing system) of 471 UK COVID-19 index cases were recruited to the Assessment of Transmission and Contagiousness of COVID-19 in Contacts cohort study and contributed 8145 upper respiratory tract samples from daily sampling for up to 20 days) “vaccination reduces the risk of delta variant infection and accelerates viral clearance. Nonetheless, fully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections have peak viral load similar to unvaccinated cases and can efficiently transmit infection in household settings, including to fully vaccinated contacts.”
19. Keehner et al. in NEJM, has recently reported on the resurgence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a highly vaccinated health system workforce. Vaccination with mRNA vaccines began in mid-December 2020; by March, 76% of the workforce had been fully vaccinated, and by July, the percentage had risen to 87%. Infections had decreased dramatically by early February 2021…”coincident with the end of California’s mask mandate on June 15 and the rapid dominance of the B.1.617.2 (delta) variant that first emerged in mid-April and accounted for over 95% of UCSDH isolates by the end of July, infections increased rapidly, including cases among fully vaccinated persons…researchers reported that the “dramatic change in vaccine effectiveness from June to July is likely to be due to both the emergence of the delta variant and waning immunity over time.”
20. Juthani et al. sought to describe the impact of vaccination on admission to hospital in patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection using real-world data collected by the Yale New Haven Health System. “Patients were considered fully vaccinated if the final dose (either second dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, or first dose of Ad.26.COV2.S) was administered at least 14 days before symptom onset or a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. In total, we identified 969 patients who were admitted to a Yale New Haven Health System hospital with a confirmed positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2”…Researchers reported “a higher number of patients with severe or critical illness in those who received the BNT162b2 vaccine than in those who received mRNA-1273 or Ad.26.COV2.S…”
21. A very recent study published by the CDC reported that a majority (53%) of patients who were hospitalized with Covid-19-like illnesses were already fully vaccinated with two-dose RNA shots. Table 1 reveals that among the 20,101 immunocompromised adults hospitalized with Covid-19, 10,564 (53%) were fully-vaccinated with the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine (Vaccination was defined as having received exactly 2 doses of an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine ≥14 days before the hospitalization index date, which was the date of respiratory specimen collection associated with the most recent positive or negative SARS-CoV-2 test result before the hospitalization or the hospitalization date if testing only occurred after the admission). This highlights the ongoing challenges faced with Delta breakthrough when vaccinated.
22. Eyre, 2021 looked at The impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on Alpha & Delta variant transmission. They reported that “while vaccination still lowers the risk of infection, similar viral loads in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals infected with Delta question how much vaccination prevents onward transmission… transmission reductions declined over time since second vaccination, for Delta reaching similar levels to unvaccinated individuals by 12 weeks for ChAdOx1 and attenuating substantially for BNT162b2. Protection from vaccination in contacts also declined in the 3 months after second vaccination…vaccination reduces transmission of Delta, but by less than the Alpha variant.”
23. Levine-Tiefenbrun, 2021 looked at Viral loads of Delta-variant SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections after vaccination and booster with BNT162b2, and reported the viral load reduction effectiveness declines with time after vaccination, “significantly decreasing at 3 months after vaccination and effectively vanishing after about 6 months.”
24. Puranik, 2021 looked at a Comparison of two highly-effective mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 during periods of Alpha and Delta variant prevalence, reporting “In July, vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization has remained high (mRNA-1273: 81%, 95% CI: 33–96.3%; BNT162b2: 75%, 95% CI: 24–93.9%), but effectiveness against infection was lower for both vaccines (mRNA-1273: 76%, 95% CI: 58–87%; BNT162b2: 42%, 95% CI: 13–62%), with a more pronounced reduction for BNT162b2.”
25. Saade, 2021 looked at Live virus neutralization testing in convalescent patients and subjects vaccinated against 19A, 20B, 20I/501Y.V1 and 20H/501Y.V2 isolates of SARS-CoV-2, and reported as “Assessed the neutralizing capacity of antibodies to prevent cell infection, using a live virus neutralization test with different strains [19A (initial one), 20B (B.1.1.241 lineage), 20I/501Y.V1 (B.1.1.7 lineage), and 20H/501Y.V2 (B.1.351 lineage)] in serum samples collected from different populations: two-dose vaccinated COVID-19-naive healthcare workers (HCWs; Pfizer-BioNTech BNT161b2), 6-months post mild COVID-19 HCWs, and critical COVID-19 patients… finding of the present study is the reduced neutralizing response observed towards the 20H/501Y.V2 variant in fully immunized subjects with the BNT162b2 vaccine by comparison to the wild type and 20I/501Y.V1 variant.”
26. Canaday, 2021 looked at Significant reduction in humoral immunity among healthcare workers and nursing home residents 6 months after COVID-19 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination, reporting “Anti-spike, anti-RBD and neutralization levels dropped more than 84% over 6 months’ time in all groups irrespective of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. At 6 months post-vaccine, 70% of the infection-naive NH residents had neutralization titers at or below the lower limit of detection compared to 16% at 2 weeks after full vaccination. These data demonstrate a significant reduction in levels of antibody in all groups. In particular, those infection-naive NH residents had lower initial post-vaccination humoral immunity immediately and exhibited the greatest declines 6 months later.”
27. Israel, 2021 looked at Large-scale study of antibody titer decay following BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine or SARS-CoV-2 infection, and reported as “To determine the kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies following administration of two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine, or SARS-CoV-2 infection in unvaccinated individuals…In vaccinated subjects, antibody titers decreased by up to 40% each subsequent month while in convalescents they decreased by less than 5% per month. Six months after BNT162b2 vaccination 16.1% subjects had antibody levels below the sero-positivity threshold of <50 AU/mL, while only 10.8% of convalescent patients were below <50 AU/mL threshold after 9 months from SARS-CoV-2 infection.”
28. Eyran, 2020 examined The longitudinal kinetics of antibodies in COVID-19 recovered patients over 14 months, and found “a significantly faster decay in naïve vaccinees compared to recovered patients suggesting that the serological memory following natural infection is more robust compared to vaccination. Our data highlights the differences between serological memory induced by natural infection vs. vaccination.”
29. Salvatore et al. examined the transmission potential of vaccinated and unvaccinated persons infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in a federal prison, July-August 2021. They found a total of 978 specimens were provided by 95 participants, “of whom 78 (82%) were fully vaccinated and 17 (18%) were not fully vaccinated….clinicians and public health practitioners should consider vaccinated persons who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 to be no less infectious than unvaccinated persons.”
30) Andeweg et al. analyzed 28,578 sequenced SARS-CoV-2 samples from individuals with known immune status obtained through national community testing in the Netherlands from March to August 2021. They found evidence for an “increased risk of infection by the Beta (B.1.351), Gamma (P.1), or Delta (B.1.617.2) variants compared to the Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant after vaccination. No clear differences were found between vaccines. However, the effect was larger in the first 14-59 days after complete vaccination compared to 60 days and longer. In contrast to vaccine-induced immunity, no increased risk for reinfection with Beta, Gamma or Delta variants relative to Alpha variant was found in individuals with infection-induced immunity.”
31) Di Fusco et al. conducted an evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections among immunocompromised patients fully vaccinated with BNT162b2. “COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections were examined in fully vaccinated (≥14 days after 2nd dose) IC individuals (IC cohort), 12 mutually exclusive IC condition groups, and a non-IC cohort.” They found that“of 1,277,747 individuals ≥16 years of age who received 2 BNT162b2 doses, 225,796 (17.7%) were identified as IC (median age: 58 years; 56.3% female). The most prevalent IC conditions were solid malignancy (32.0%), kidney disease (19.5%), and rheumatologic/inflammatory conditions (16.7%). Among the fully vaccinated IC and non-IC cohorts, a total of 978 breakthrough infections were observed during the study period; 124 (12.7%) resulted in hospitalization and 2 (0.2%) were inpatient deaths. IC individuals accounted for 38.2% (N = 374) of all breakthrough infections, 59.7% (N = 74) of all hospitalizations, and 100% (N = 2) of inpatient deaths. The proportion with breakthrough infections was 3 times higher in the IC cohort compared to the non-IC cohort (N = 374 [0.18%] vs. N = 604 [0.06%]; unadjusted incidence rates were 0.89 and 0.34 per 100 person-years, respectively.”
32) Mallapaty (NATURE) reported that the protective effect of being vaccinated if you already had infection is “relatively small, and dwindles alarmingly at three months after the receipt of the second shot.” Mallapaty further adds what we have been warning the public health community which is that persons infected with Delta have about the same levels of viral genetic materials in their noses “regardless of whether they’d previously been vaccinated, suggesting that vaccinated and unvaccinated people might be equally infectious.” Mallapaty reported on testing data from 139,164 close contacts of 95,716 people infected with SARS-CoV-2 between January and August 2021 in the United Kingdom, and at a time when the Alpha and Delta variants were competing for dominance. The finding was that “although the vaccines did offer some protection against infection and onward transmission, Delta dampened that effect. A person who was fully vaccinated and then had a ‘breakthrough’ Delta infection was almost twice as likely to pass on the virus as someone who was infected with Alpha. And that was on top of the higher risk of having a breakthrough infection caused by Delta than one caused by Alpha.”
33) Chia et al. reported that PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values were “similar between both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups at diagnosis, but viral loads decreased faster in vaccinated individuals. Early, robust boosting of anti-spike protein antibodies was observed in vaccinated patients, however, these titers were significantly lower against B.1.617.2 as compared with the wildtype vaccine strain.”
34) Wilhelm et al. reported on reduced neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant by vaccine sera and monoclonal antibodies. “in vitro findings using authentic SARS-CoV-2 variants indicate that in contrast to the currently circulating Delta variant, the neutralization efficacy of vaccine-elicited sera against Omicron was severely reduced highlighting T-cell mediated immunity as essential barrier to prevent severe COVID-19.”
35) CDC reported on the details for 43 cases of COVID-19 attributed to the Omicron variant. They found that “34 (79%) occurred in persons who completed the primary series of an FDA-authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccine ≥14 days before symptom onset or receipt of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result.”
36) Dejnirattisai et al. presented live neutralisation titres against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, and examined it relative to neutralisation against the Victoria, Beta and Delta variants. They reported a significant drop in “neutralisation titres in recipients of both AZD1222 and BNT16b2 primary courses, with evidence of some recipients failing to neutralise at all.”
37) Cele et al. assessed whether Omicron variant escapes antibody neutralization “elicited by the Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in people who were vaccinated only or vaccinated and previously infected.” They reported that Omicron variant “still required the ACE2 receptor to infect but had extensive escape of Pfizer elicited neutralization.”
38) Holm Hansen et al.’s Denmark study looked at vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series. A key finding was reported as “VE against Omicron was 55.2% initially following primary BNT162b2 vaccination, but waned quickly thereafter. Although estimated with less precision, VE against Omicron after primary mRNA-1273 vaccination similarly indicated a rapid decline in protection. By comparison, both vaccines showed higher, longer-lasting protection against Delta.” In other words, the vaccine that has failed against Delta is even far worse for Omicron. The table and figure below paint a devastating picture. See where the green dot is (Omicron variant) in the vertical lines (blue is Delta) and the 2 edges of the bars (upper and lower lips) 91 days out for Omicron (3 months). Both Pfizer and Moderna show negative efficacy for Omicron at 31 days (both are below the ‘line of no effect’ or ‘0’). The comparative table is even more devastating for it shows how much less vaccine effectiveness there is for Omicron. For example, at 1-30 days, Pfizer showed 55.2% effectiveness for Omicron versus 86.7% for Delta, and for the same period, Moderna showed 36.7% effectiveness for Omicron versus 88.2% for Delta.
39) UK reporting showed that boosters protect against symptomatic COVID-19 caused by Omicron for about 10 weeks; the UK Health Security Agency reported protection against symptomatic COVID-19 caused by the variant dropped from 70% to 45% following a Pfizer booster for those initially vaccinated with the shot developed by Pfizer with BioNTech. Specifically reporting by the UK Health Security Agency showed “Among those who received an AstraZeneca primary course, vaccine effectiveness was around 60% 2 to 4 weeks after either a Pfizer or Moderna booster, then dropped to 35% with a Pfizer booster and 45% with a Moderna booster by 10 weeks after the booster. Among those who received a Pfizer primary course, vaccine effectiveness was around 70% after a Pfizer booster, dropping to 45% after 10-plus weeks and stayed around 70 to 75% after a Moderna booster up to 9 weeks after booster.”
40) Buchan et al. used a test-negative design to assess vaccine effectiveness against OMICRON or DELTA variants (regardless of symptoms or severity) during November 22 and December 19, 2021. They included persons who had received at least 2 COVID-19 vaccine doses (with at least 1 mRNA vaccine dose for the primary series) and applied multivariable logistic regression modelling analysis to “estimate the effectiveness of two or three doses by time since the latest dose.” They included 3,442 Omicron-positive cases, 9,201 Delta-positive cases, and 471,545 test-negative controls. Following 2 doses, “vaccine effectiveness against Delta infection declined steadily over time but recovered to 93% (95%CI, 92-94%) ≥7 days after receiving an mRNA vaccine for the third dose. In contrast, receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines was not protective against Omicron. Vaccine effectiveness against Omicron was 37% (95%CI, 19-50%) ≥7 days after receiving an mRNA vaccine for the third dose.”
41) Public Health Scotland COVID-19 & Winter Statistical Report ( Publication date: 19 January 2022) provided startling data on page 38 (case rates), page 44 (hospitalization), and page 50 (deaths), showing that the vaccination has failed Delta but critically, is failing omicron. The 2nd inoculation data is of particular concern. Table 14 age-standardized case data is very troubling for it shows across the multiple weeks of study that across each dose (1 vs 2 vs 3 booster inoculations) that the vaccinated are greatly more infected than the unvaccinated, with the 2nd dose being alarmingly elevated (see grey rows). Age-standardized rates of acute hospital admissions are stunningly elevated after 2nd inoculation (over the unvaccinated) during January 2022. Looking at table 16 that reports on the number of confirmed COVID-19 related deaths by vaccination status, we again observe massive elevation in death at the 2ndinoculation. This data indicates to us that the vaccine is associated with infection and is not optimally working against omicron and that the protection is limited, waning rapidly.
42) The UK’s COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report Week 3, 20 January 2022, raises very serious concern as to the failure of the vaccines on Delta (which is basically now being replaced by omicron for dominance) and omicron. When we look at table 9, page 34 (COVID-19 cases by vaccination status between week 51 2021 and week 2 2022), we see greater case numbers for the 2nd and 3rd inoculations. The important table on page 38, Figure 12 (unadjusted rates of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations) shows us a continual pattern in the UK data over the last 2 to 3 to 4 months, with the present reporting showing that persons in receipt of the 3rd inoculation (booster) at far greater risk of infection/cases than the unvaccinated (30 years of age and above age strata).
43) In the recent UK Public Health surveillance reports Week 9, Week 8, as well as week 7 (UK COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report Week 7 17 February 2022), week 6 (COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report Week 6 10 February 2022) and week 5 for 2022 (COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report Week 5 3 February 2022) as well as the reports accumulated for 2021 since vaccine roll-out, we see that the vaccinated are at higher risk of infection and especially for age groups above 18 years old, as well as hospitalization and even death. This is particularly marked for those in receipt of double vaccinations. There is increased risk of death for those who are triple vaccinated and especially as age increases. The same pattern emerges in the Scottish data.
44.) Regev-Yochay et al. in Israel looked at (publication date March 16th 2022) the immunogenicity and safety of a fourth dose (4th) of either BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) administered 4 months after the third dose in a series of three BNT162b2 doses). This was an open-label, nonrandomized clinical study assessing the 4th dose in terms of need beyond the 3rd dose. Among the ‘1050 eligible health care workers enrolled in the Sheba HCW COVID-19 Cohort, 154 received the fourth dose of BNT162b2 and, 1 week later, 120 received mRNA-1273. For each participant, two age-matched controls were selected from the remaining eligible participants’.
Researchers further reported that ‘overall, 25.0% of the participants in the control group were infected with the omicron variant, as compared with 18.3% of the participants in the BNT162b2 group and 20.7% of those in the mRNA-1273 group. Vaccine efficacy against any SARS-CoV-2 infection was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], −9 to 55) for BNT162b2 and 11% (95% CI, −43 to 44) for mRNA-1273…most of the infected participants were potentially infectious, with relatively high viral loads (nucleocapsid gene cycle threshold, ≤25)’. Results suggest that maximal immunogenicity of mRNA vaccines is achieved after three doses. More specifically, researchers ‘observed low vaccine efficacy against infections in health care workers, as well as relatively high viral loads suggesting that those who were infected were infectious. Thus, a fourth vaccination of healthy young health care workers may have only marginal benefits’.
These finding are not unknown to public health authorities. In fact, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky have said that the Covid vaccines are working “exceptionally well” against severe illness and death, but “what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.”
What these studies show, are that vaccines are important to reduce severe disease and death, but unable to prevent the disease from spreading and eventually infect most of us. That is, while the vaccines provide individual benefits to the vaccinee, and especially to older high-risk people, the public benefit of universal vaccination is in grave doubt. As such, Covid vaccines should not be expected to contribute to eliminating the communal spread of the virus or the reaching of herd immunity. This unravels the rationale for vaccine mandates and passports.
Author
Please have a look at THIS ARTICLE (excerpt below)
UK Government Data proves the Covid-19 Vaccines DOUBLE your chances of catching Covid-19
The latest data published by the UK Health Security Agency proves without a shadow of doubt that Covid-19 vaccination doubles your chances of catching Covid-19.
Cases reported by specimen date between week 50 2021 & Week1 2022 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1046431/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-2-2022.pdf
These figures, for those 18 and over, speak for themselves.
By a concerned reader
1. There are presently over 7x more Covid19 cases in the double vaxxed than there are in the unvaxxed in circumstances where there are 3.5x more vaxxed people than unvaxxed people
2. In the last 4 weeks there were over 2 million fully vaccinated Covid-19 cases. Well, there is an effective vaccination for you!
3. Fully vaccinated people today are precisely twice as likely to catch Covid as unvaccinated people.
4. Those under 18 face a tiny risk from Omicron – equivalent to normal flu, which Covid has now mutated into
So let’s all rush out and get vaccinated in order to double our chances of catching the disease we are being vaccinated against shall we?.
Sajid Javid said that the vaccines would “protect young people from Omicron, help to keep schools open and protect their friends and families.” – https://inews.co.uk/news/education/get-kids-jabbed-keep-schools-open-health-secretary-urges-parents-1390819
Whereas in truth, the government’s own figures show unequivocally that vaccines double the danger you, your friends and your relatives face from Covid attack.
The UK government is promoting, financing and legislating a doubling of the size of the Covid pandemic.
To date, government prescribed health care has destroyed only 50% of your immune response to the flu. Obviously more work needs to be done to get this figure up to the 100% that Pharmaceutical companies desire. Because the one thing that stops them making profits is a fully functional immune system in their customers.
And of course if you are not one of their customers then you need to be fired from your job, locked up in your home, banned from visiting your dying relatives and falsely smeared as a covid spreader in circumstances where the government’s own figures show that you are twice as safe as their customers. So who are the drug pushers now?
To see the rest of the article, please CLICK HERE.
A Midwestern Doctor (Substack writer) posted this article (excerpt below), with a video that shows how the Military was forced to take the Anthrax vaccine, and it created serious health problems and disabilities for many people who took it. Just posting this to show how history has a way of repeating itself. For some reason the embed link isn't working properly, but you can see a video about the Military's Anthrax vaccine disaster, by clicking HERE.
For those of you who would like to know more on this subject (or want something to share for friends who won’t read articles), this excellent, brief 44 minute documentary covers many of the themes highlighted here. It contains the video footage of senior members of the military repeatedly lying through their teeth to the soldiers at Dover Air Force Base, the penalties soldiers faced for not complying, and many of the personal stories of severe life altering vaccine injuries that were swept under the rug.
EXPOSED !! COVID-19 VACCINES DO NOT STOP TRANSMISSION OF COVID, BUT INSTEAD INCREASE IT !!
Bill Gates admits COVID-19 vaccines don't stop viral transmission - Rebel News
5,800 Contracted Covid After Vaccination
COVID Infections AFTER Vaccination
Is COVID Worse Than Last Year? | Steve Deace Show
The COVID Vaccines Are Causing Organ Damage and Death. "It is now biologically possible" - Dr. Peter McCullough
"COVID VACCINES HAVE KILLED AT LEAST 150,000 AMERICANS" - Steve Kirsch interview with Mike Adams
ARE BOOSTERS MAKING PEOPLE VULNERABLE TO COVID?
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/stunning-official-canadian-data-show/comments
Vaccinated people are now more likely to be hospitalized or die from Covid, even after adjusting for fact they're older than the unvaccinated, according to official government estimates from the Canadian province of Manitoba.
In May, the most recent month for which figures are available, only 9 percent of Covid deaths and 14 percent of hospital admissions in Manitoba occurred among unvaccinated people, even though they are 17 percent of the population.
Manitoba, which has about 1.4 million residents, also provides figures that are adjusted for the fact that vaccinated and boosted people tend to be older.
Those show that in May, vaccinated but unboosted people were about 50 percent more likely to be hospitalized or die of Covid than unvaccinated people. People who had received boosters had roughly the same risk of hospitalization or death as the unvaccinated.
(Red is unvaccinated, green is vaccinated, blue is boosted. See how the green bar is higher? That means vaccinated people are more likely to die of Covid. Otherwise, everything is fine.)
These figures and estimates differ markedly from those the Centers for Disease Control have provided for American Covid deaths. But they are likely to be far more accurate. American hospitals and health authorities classify Covid deaths and hospitalizations as occurring in the unvaccinated until proven otherwise.
Countries with national health insurance can match their vaccination registries more easily against hospital admissions and deaths, and they have consistently shown much higher percentages of Covid deaths in vaccinated people.
Still, the data from Manitoba appear to mark the first time that any government agency has actually found a higher risk of death in vaccinated people.
This kind of data is so clear, in country after country deaths increased after mass vaccination.
Steve not sure if you have come across this site https://www.realnotrare.com people telling their adverse events.