Tuesday, January 26, 2021

What I learned about Quinine (what's in Hydroxychloroquine)

 





















https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973170/


Logo of tropmedLink to Publisher's site
. 2016 Aug 3; 95(2): 269–272.
PMCID: PMC4973170
PMID: 27185766

Historical Review: Problematic Malaria Prophylaxis with Quinine

The use of quinine has been known for 300 or 400 years, yet no one is even now able to state how the quinine should be taken, in what manner, and in what doses.” Warrington Yorke.

Quinine was the first specific drug for malaria infections, derived from an alkali extract of cinchona bark from Andean forests, and supposedly was first recognized when it was used to treat tropical fever in the Countess of Chinchon in Peru. Initially introduced to Europe as Jesuit's bark in the 17th century, claims for its efficacy often varied by nationality of the physicians involved as much as the quality (bitterness) of the bark., As early as the Siege of Belgrade in 1717, cinchona bark was being used to suppress malaria in soldiers. James Lind of the British Royal Navy in 1777 recommended that ships on the Guinea station (west Africa) “be supplied with a large quantity of bark in powder and of wine to be issued occasionally to those who are sent in boats up rivers and on shore.” Cinchona bark varied greatly in its concentration of the active alkaloids, so it was not until these compounds were isolated by the French chemists Pelletier and Caventou in 1820 that dosages were even able to be estimated. Various proprietary compounds largely containing quinine such as Warburg's mixture and Sappington's fever pills were popularized as treatments for fevers and agues now thought to be due to malaria. The organized use of large amounts of quinine to prevent malarial illness was largely done by colonial military units in the tropics, especially Africa and southeast Asia. For unclear reasons, parasite resistance to quinine is very uncommon unlike nearly all other antimalarial drugs. An immense body of historical literature discusses the various aspects of using quinine for malaria prevention, and an even larger number of papers describe various aspects of an associated disease known as blackwater fever. This literature, particularly as it applies to military units, will be very briefly reviewed with the purpose of illustrating characteristics needed in modern drugs for malaria chemoprophylaxis.

Chemoprophylaxis

Quinine is a short-acting medication where a single oral dose maintains a measurable drug concentration for a matter of hours not days. Its foul taste is recognized in the “bitters” used to prepare gin and tonic. In therapeutic doses, it often causes a set of unpleasant symptoms known as cinchonism which includes tinnitus, vertigo, headache, dysphoria, nausea, and vomiting. It is available in a variety of salts of variable solubility ranging from dissolved liquid to rock-like pellets found in the stool after oral ingestion. As a medication to give to otherwise well soldiers in hopes of keeping them free of malaria, it has several problems relating to maintaining compliance with an unpleasant, imperfect drug.

Even in frequent repeated doses likely to cause cinchonism, quinine does not actually prevent malaria infection either due to the more lethal falciparum or relapsing varieties such as vivax. Infection occurs in the liver, which then seeds the bloodstream approximately 10 days after an infective mosquito bite. Quinine suppresses malaria infections in the blood with the aim to maintain the soldier fit for duty. Cessation of daily quinine suppression will soon result in symptomatic malaria as bloodstream infections recrudesce or latent liver parasites (hypnozoites) of vivax malaria relapse. Even high levels of medication compliance will result in occasional symptomatic episodes of malaria which discredits both the drug and the physician.,,,

Ordering a military unit to take quinine to prevent symptomatic malaria was at best problematic with the risk of cinchonism seemingly poorly balanced against the modest benefit of suppressed parasites. “Prophylactic rations” of quinine were tried in the British/Indian Army during its campaigns in China in the 1860s. Multiple comparative tests of quinine versus no medication in various military units were tried by enthusiastic medical officers in India, often with indeterminate results.,,, When reading reports from the 19th century, it is important to realize that the parasitic nature of malaria was not understood until Medical Assistant Major Alphonse Laveran of the French Army in Algeria found microscopic parasites in 1880; its transmission by mosquitoes was revealed only after the discoveries of Surgeon Major Ronald Ross of the Indian Army in 1898, and comparative clinical trials were not well designed until mid-20th century., Surgeon General George Sternberg of the U.S. Army recommended prophylactic quinine in his 1884 textbook, but seemed just as impressed by the benefit of a good cup of coffee. In all cases, soldiers heartily disliked regular quinine parades and adopted multiple means to avoid ingesting the medication (Figure 1 ).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tropmed-95-269-g001.jpg

Australian soldiers in Rabaul, New Guinea, receiving their daily regimen of quinine to prevent malaria, August 3, 1917 (Australian War Memorial photo A2739).

When the first large scale attempt by Lieutenant Colonel S. Price James and Captain S. Rickard Christophers to control mosquitoes to stop malaria at Mian Mir (near Lahore, now in Pakistan) failed despite filling in the canals, quinine treatment of children in the bazaar and soldiers in barracks added little in the way of efficacy., Lieutenant Colonel S. Price James on reviewing the results of the many years of work at Mian Mir, became a major proponent of prophylactic quinine largely due to practicality, especially cost. His advocacy of quinine prophylaxis at the League of Nations Malaria Commission was matched by massive civilian quinine distribution projects in both Italy and India., Whether the drug was beneficial was difficult to determine, but at least the Italian malaria mortality rates continued to decrease during the interwar period. By the advent of the Second World War, multiple national armies were well aware of the limitations of quinine prophylaxis, but it remained the standard medication as the only two synthetic antimalarial drugs pamaquine and atabrine (also known as mepacrine, quinacrine, and atebrin) had severe adverse events or had not yet been widely field tested, respectively.

Severe Adverse Events

Blackwater fever usually occurs in expatriates living for several years in a highly malarious area while taking intermittent and variable amounts of quinine., Rarely, a massive hemolytic event occurred in a person who had previously tolerated the medication, resulting in hemoglobinuria (blackwater), sometimes progressing to acute renal failure and death. During the early 20th century, blackwater fever was the leading medical cause of death in expatriate soldiers and administrators in colonial Africa and some parts of south Asia. The relationship to quinine was not universal, but a series of blackwater fever patients showed that a larger than normal quinine dose usually preceded hemolysis by some hours. During the building of the Panama Canal from 1904–1910, Colonel William Gorgas of the U.S. Army distributed literally tons of quinine, subsequently observing 226 blackwater fever cases from a total worker population of 50,000; it occurred mostly in Spanish and Italian laborers., The pathophysiology of blackwater fever was widely studied, but remains poorly understood. Its association with prophylactic quinine meant that very different national policies existed, and different groups of expatriates had fixed ideas about what was or was not the appropriate use of the drug.,, Blackwater fever entered the folklore of African expatriates, where besides being greatly feared as supposedly always being lethal, required never moving a blackwater fever patient from his sickbed as this would surely cause immediate death.

The most definitive information on the genesis of blackwater fever was gathered by Brigadier G. M. Findlay of the British Army in western Africa during the Second World War. Hemolytic episodes rapidly increased after large numbers of British soldiers had been receiving prophylactic quinine for some months. In 1942, blackwater fever risk in British soldiers in west Africa was about 8/1000, and had approximately a 30% mortality rate. On March 15, 1943, the entire military command switched from quinine to atabrine for malaria chemoprophylaxis. It was reported that blackwater fever subsequently disappeared from British soldiers except for a few stubborn individuals that insisted on continuing to self-administer quinine regardless. Interestingly, it was after the switch to atabrine that hemolytic episodes in African soldiers began to increase, perhaps due to glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Blackwater fever cases are still seen in circumstances when physicians revert to chronic quinine use, but its actual cause remains poorly understood as some complex interaction between falciparum malaria, G6PD deficiency, and quinine.

Public Health

Prophylactic quinine was aimed at the individual, but also had implications for the entire military and civilian population. Those on chronic quinine suppression in areas of high malaria endemicity might still have a few parasites seen on microscopic blood smears, indicating how imperfectly a short-acting drug dealt with chronic infections., Although quinine had no effect on hypnozoites in the liver, there is recent evidence that quinine can increase the switching of Plasmodium falciparum from the erythrocytic cycle to the sexual stage gametocytes needed to infect mosquitoes. The best argument used by those favoring mosquito elimination against those advocating mass drug administration with quinine for malaria control was that by increasing the number of persons with gametocytes in their blood, one was actually increasing and not decreasing potential transmission to new persons. Given the epidemiological tools available, this was an untestable hypothesis which left free rein for authoritative professors to advocate their particular prejudice. Much heat with little light was generated by extensive late night discussions recorded during meetings of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene in London.,,,, Review of programs of national distribution of quinine were ambiguous as to their efficacy, and were often done largely for social or political ends as in Mussolini's “bonification” of the Pontine Marshes near Rome in the 1930s.,

Drug Supply

Quinine was subject to the first global pharmaceutical cartel when the usually noninterventionist Dutch government saw falling prices nearly destroy the commercial viability of its East Indies (Indonesia) cinchona plantations.,, The conflict between plantation owners, mostly in the East Indies, wanting high prices and quinine manufacturers, predominately in Germany, wanting low prices with a steady supply of bark seemingly could not be managed solely by market forces. This resulted in a series of Quinine Agreements from 1913, whereby the Dutch government sought to control the price of cinchona bark while maintaining the financial health of the cinchona plantations. All cartels have unintended consequences, and the Quinine Agreements resulted in a near monopoly of cinchona grown in the Dutch colonial East Indies, while discouraging any industrial innovation that might have produced a synthetic substitute for quinine. This was the proximate cause of the military supply crisis generated when the Japanese Imperial Army captured the East Indies, and acquired essentially the entire world's supply of quinine. Desperate efforts in 1942 were made to provide quinine for Allied soldiers, which included Colonel N. Hamilton Fairley of the Australian Army bargaining directly for a ship load of cinchona in Batavia that was later intercepted or diverted, and Colonel Arthur Fischer of the U.S. Army flying out of Mindanao, in the Philippines, on the last surviving aircraft holding a box of cinchona seeds that were eventually planted in Costa Rica., An emergency scientific effort to develop new antimalarial drugs was second in priority only to the Manhattan Project (nuclear weapons) in the U.S. military's Second World War research and development activities.

Conclusion

The history of prophylactic quinine indicates that medical officers were doing their best under the circumstances with an unpopular and imperfect drug. Multiple studies failed to show substantial differences between those given quinine and comparator groups, which often generated polarized opinions regarding why the study was not done to an adequate standard versus why the drug cannot possibly accomplish the task assigned.,,,, Blackwater fever generated its own subculture of fear and mystery which has still not been penetrated.,, Prophylaxis of an individual does not always translate to epidemiological advantage for a population. A single source of vital drug supplies risk disruption when an unanticipated event intervenes., Quinine was eventually superseded by better chemoprophylactic medications, and now is largely of historical interest.

By the end of the 20th century, three different antimalarial drugs were available for malaria chemoprophylaxis: doxycycline, atovaquone with proguanil, and mefloquine. Despite having access to effective medications far superior to quinine, both soldiers and travelers continue to be infected by malaria in the tropics, often becoming critically ill on return. Information gathered by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control invariably shows that the greatest number of malaria cases reported in the United States either received no medication for prevention or a regimen outdated by drug resistance. Although better than quinine, both doxycycline and atovaquone with proguanil still require daily medication and some continued use after return from the endemic area. The adverse event profile of doxycycline commonly includes gastrointestinal upset rather than cinchonism. The rare neuropsychiatric adverse events of mefloquine mean that few people are willing to take it, especially after reading various internet posts. The same problems initially seen with quinine consisting of common nonserious adverse events, fear of rare serious adverse events, and availability or cost issues are the usual reasons why modern soldiers and travelers report noncompliance. Given human nature, it is unlikely that these impediments will ever disappear regardless of the medication used.

History indicates what is needed in the future for malaria chemoprevention without having to painfully repeat all the lessons of the past. Medications that are difficult to administer or unpopular to ingest are not good drugs to give to otherwise well persons. When the benefit of the medication is only the future absence of illness, then the perceived risks need to be very low. Severe adverse events, no matter how rare, once associated with a medication often dictate policy despite, or perhaps because of, the inability to estimate the actual risk to an individual. Critical pharmaceutical supplies need to have multiple sources to avoid unanticipated disruptions. It is greatly hoped that future medications for malaria chemoprophylaxis provide a substantial improvement over current medications and the inevitable problems that arise when introducing a new medication for malaria can be successfully managed.

Blackwater fever is a complication of malaria infection in which red blood cells burst in the bloodstream (hemolysis), releasing hemoglobin directly into the blood vessels and into the urine, frequently leading to kidney failure.
What causes blackwater fever?
Blackwater fever, also called malarial hemoglobinuria, one of the less common yet most dangerous complications of malaria. It occurs almost exclusively with infection from the parasite Plasmodium falciparum.


Blackwater fever is a complication of malaria infection in which red blood cells burst in the bloodstream (hemolysis), releasing hemoglobin directly into the blood vessels and into the urine, frequently leading to kidney failure.


Blackwater fever

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Blackwater fever
SpecialtyInfectious disease

Blackwater fever is a complication of malaria infection in which red blood cells burst in the bloodstream (hemolysis), releasing hemoglobin directly into the blood vessels and into the urine, frequently leading to kidney failure. The disease was first linked to malaria by the Sierra Leonean physician Dr John Farrell Easmon in his 1884 pamphlet entitled The Nature and Treatment of Blackwater Fever. Easmon coined the name "blackwater fever" and was the first to successfully treat such cases following the publication of his pamphlet.

Signs and symptoms[edit]

Within a few days of onset there are chills, with rigor, high feverjaundice, vomiting, rapidly progressive anemia, and dark red or black urine.

Causes[edit]

The cause of hemolytic crises in this disease is unknown (mainly due to intravascular haemolysis). There is rapid and massive destruction of red blood cells resulting in hemoglobinemia (hemoglobin in the blood, but outside the red blood cells), hemoglobinuria (hemoglobin in urine), intense jaundice, anuria (passing less than 50 milliliters of urine in a day), and finally death in the majority of cases.[citation needed]

The most probable explanation for blackwater fever is an autoimmune reaction apparently caused by the interaction of the malaria parasite and the use of quinine. Blackwater fever is caused by heavy parasitization of red blood cells with Plasmodium falciparum. There has been at least one case, however, attributed to Plasmodium vivax.[1]

Blackwater fever is a serious complication of malaria, but cerebral malaria has a higher mortality rate. Blackwater fever is much less common today than it was before 1950.[2] It may be that quinine plays a role in triggering the condition[citation needed], and this drug is no longer commonly used for malaria prophylaxis. Quinine remains important for treatment of malaria.[citation needed]

Treatment[edit]

The treatment is antimalarial chemotherapy, intravenous fluid and sometimes supportive care such as intensive care and dialysis.

Prominent victims[edit]

  • Prior to his photography career, Henri Cartier-Bresson[3] contracted blackwater fever while hunting in Western Africa. Expecting to die, he sent instructions to his family on his wishes for a funeral. He made a full recovery.
  • Zoologist John Samuel Budgett died from the disease in 1904, after returning from a collecting trip to West Africa, in search of specimens of the fish Polypterus.[4]
  • Missionary and explorer George Grenfell died after a bad attack of blackwater fever at Basoko on 1 July 1906.[citation needed]
  • Jesse Brand, a missionary to the Chat Mountains in India, died of blackwater fever in 1928.[citation needed]
  • Actor Don Adams, best known as Maxwell Smart from the popular sitcom Get Smart and as the title character in Inspector Gadget, contracted blackwater fever after being shot in combat at Guadalcanal during World War II. Adams was evacuated from his United States Marine Corps unit to a hospital in New Zealand where he ultimately made a full recovery.[citation needed]
  • Humanitarian and MMA fighter Justin Wren contracted malaria, which devolved into blackwater fever, while drilling water-wells for Congo Pygmies in 2013. The affliction nearly claimed Wren's life. He was misdiagnosed four times and required airlift to Uganda, where he narrowly recovered from severe symptoms.[5]
  • Aeneas, Jeannie Gunn's husband, is described as having died from Blackwater Fever or Malarial Dysentry at Elsey Station in the Northern Territory in 1903.[citation needed] She later authored the classic account We of the Never Never.
  • Bernard Deacon
  • Peter Cameron Scott, a Scottish-American missionary and founder of Africa Inland Mission, died from the disease in December 1896.



This article will be misleading to a lot of people who read it. They are trying to say Quinine is totally different from Hyrdoxychloroquine, but it's obvious that they've copied it. 


https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-quinine/fact-check-hydroxychloroquine-is-not-the-same-as-quinine-and-cant-be-made-at-home-idUSKBN2370R9


 

Fact check: Hydroxychloroquine is not the same as quinine and can't be made at home

A post being circulated on social media post incorrectly claims the anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine, which is being used by some doctors in the treatment of COVID-19, is the same as quinine.

The drug hydroxychloroquine, pushed by U.S. President Donald Trump and others in recent months as a possible treatment to people infected with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), is displayed by a pharmacist at the Rock Canyon Pharmacy in Provo, Utah, U.S., May 27, 2020. REUTERS/George Frey

The post goes on to claim that the substance is “something that anyone can make at home” and goes on to give a recipe using fruit peelings.

It further adds that “tonic water has the exact same quinine” as hydroxychloroquine.

The claim that hydroxychloroquine is simply quinine is false.

Hydroxychloroquine is a synthetic drug while quinine is a naturally occurring compound found in cinchona bark.

“Hydroxychloroquine is a completely different chemical substance to quinine,” Alan Armstrong, Professor of Organic Synthesis at Imperial College London, told Reuters.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There is a small resemblance in chemical structure in that both contain a ring system known as a quinoline.

“Historically, hydroxychloroquine was discovered during efforts to synthesise alternatives to quinine as anti-malarials.”

Professor Armstrong also said he doubted that quinine could be produced by the recipe offered in the social media post.

Hydroxychloroquine, developed in the 1950s from chloroquine, an old anti-malarial drug, is registered in around 60 countries under trade names such as Plaquenil, Quensyl and Plaquinol. French company Sanofi, which produces Plaquenil, said quinine was not a component of their drug.

“Hydroxychloroquine is a synthetically manufactured drug, developed based on the chemical structure of quinine. Quinine is not a component of our drug Plaquenil, the active ingredient is hydroxychloroquine,” a spokesman said.

ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. President Donald Trump and others have pushed hydroxychloroquine in recent months but the World Health Organization (WHO) said on May 25, 2020 it was pausing a large trial of the malaria drug due to safety concerns (here) . 

Suggestions, such as in the post, that quinine used in tonic water is the same as hydroxychloroquine prompted British tonic water manufacturer Fever Tree, to issue guidance on its website (here) .

“Whilst hydroxychloroquine and quinine are both used in anti-malarial drugs, the quinine we use is naturally derived from the bark of the Cinchona tree,” Fever Tree says. “There is no proven scientific evidence that quinine or hydroxychloroquine can protect against or treat COVID-19.”

VERDICT

False. Hydroxychloroquine is a synthetic drug developed in the 1950 from chloroquine. It is not the same as quinine, which is a naturally-occurring compound.

MORE FROM REUTERS

Fact check: Hydroxychloroquine is not the same as quinine and can't be made at home

A post being circulated on social media post incorrectly claims the anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine, which is being used by some doctors in the treatment of COVID-19, is the same as quinine.

The drug hydroxychloroquine, pushed by U.S. President Donald Trump and others in recent months as a possible treatment to people infected with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), is displayed by a pharmacist at the Rock Canyon Pharmacy in Provo, Utah, U.S., May 27, 2020. REUTERS/George Frey

The post goes on to claim that the substance is “something that anyone can make at home” and goes on to give a recipe using fruit peelings.

It further adds that “tonic water has the exact same quinine” as hydroxychloroquine.

The claim that hydroxychloroquine is simply quinine is false.

Hydroxychloroquine is a synthetic drug while quinine is a naturally occurring compound found in cinchona bark.

“Hydroxychloroquine is a completely different chemical substance to quinine,” Alan Armstrong, Professor of Organic Synthesis at Imperial College London, told Reuters.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There is a small resemblance in chemical structure in that both contain a ring system known as a quinoline.

“Historically, hydroxychloroquine was discovered during efforts to synthesise alternatives to quinine as anti-malarials.”

Professor Armstrong also said he doubted that quinine could be produced by the recipe offered in the social media post.

Hydroxychloroquine, developed in the 1950s from chloroquine, an old anti-malarial drug, is registered in around 60 countries under trade names such as Plaquenil, Quensyl and Plaquinol. French company Sanofi, which produces Plaquenil, said quinine was not a component of their drug.

“Hydroxychloroquine is a synthetically manufactured drug, developed based on the chemical structure of quinine. Quinine is not a component of our drug Plaquenil, the active ingredient is hydroxychloroquine,” a spokesman said.

ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. President Donald Trump and others have pushed hydroxychloroquine in recent months but the World Health Organization (WHO) said on May 25, 2020 it was pausing a large trial of the malaria drug due to safety concerns (here) . 

Suggestions, such as in the post, that quinine used in tonic water is the same as hydroxychloroquine prompted British tonic water manufacturer Fever Tree, to issue guidance on its website (here) .

“Whilst hydroxychloroquine and quinine are both used in anti-malarial drugs, the quinine we use is naturally derived from the bark of the Cinchona tree,” Fever Tree says. “There is no proven scientific evidence that quinine or hydroxychloroquine can protect against or treat COVID-19.”

VERDICT

False. Hydroxychloroquine is a synthetic drug developed in the 1950 from chloroquine. It is not the same as quinine, which is a naturally-occurring compound.

MORE FROM REUTERS

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/03639049609063228?journalCode=iddi20#:~:text=About%205%2D6%25%20of%20the,and%20pNa%20greater%20than%201.6.&text=at%20a%20pH%20of%201.7,extraction%20of%20quinine%20was%2070.9%25.

Research Article

The Effect of pH and Ionic Strength on the Release of Quinine Adsorbed on to an Insoluble Sodium Polyphosphate

Pages 713-719 | Published online: 20 Oct 2008

The preparation and evaluation of a potential prolonged-release drug delivery system with the model drug quinine HCl adsorbed onto an insoluble sodium polyphosphate (Maddrell's phosphate type II) is described. The delivery system was prepared by equilibration of the drug with a suspension of the polyphosphate and then compressing the dried adsorbed complex into disks. It was shown that the extraction of the drug from the loose powder was enhanced by increasing the sodium ion concentration and by reducing the pH. The effect of sodium ion concentration upon release of the drug from compressed dish depended upon the pH of the dissolution fluid. At low pH, which slowly dissolved the disks, the zero-order release of quinine was reduced as the ionic strength of the dissolution medium was increased. At near-neutral pH, the release of quinine was first-order at sodium concentrations greater than 0.025 M and was zero-order at sodium concentrations lower than 0.025 M. The release was promoted by an increase in the ionic strength.

People also read







No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.