Examining RFK Jr.'s claim that the CDC “Owns over 20 vaccine patents.”
Examining RFK Jr.'s claim that the CDC “Owns over 20 vaccine patents.”
Mr. Kennedy is in very safe territory by reporting that the CDC has over 20 patents that create vast, undisclosed conflicts of interests in vaccine safety.
This past week, President-Elect Trump invited Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to discuss Mr. Kennedy leading a vaccine safety commission. The mainstream media coverage of the meeting was widespread and furious.
The vaccine industry and its media lap dogs do not want their corruption exposed in any official forum, and they have pointed their fury at Mr. Trump and Mr. Kennedy.
We have seen a great deal of media on Kennedy and his vaccine safety and corruption claims in the last week. The nice thing about that is this - because he has been in the mercury fight for so long, and started investigating the claims of moms of vaccine injured children more than a decade ago, his coverage has returned the spotlight to the corruption that was uncovered in the early days of the realization that the vaccine program was hurting our kids.
One of these old pieces of information that has made its way back into the discussion because of Mr. Kennedy's media attention is the claim that, “The CDC owns over 20 vaccines patents.”
My vaccine safety and corruption research began shortly after my son was vaccine injured in 2003, and I have heard this claim circulated since I began advocacy in this arena, but I have never seen any evidence for this claim.
In 2003, UPI reporter Mark Benjamin wrote an in depth piece on the conflicts of interest (COI) in vaccine safety entitled, “UPI Investigates: The vaccine conflict.” We have Mr. Benjamin to thank for bringing the patents and COIs held by the members of the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, including Dr. Paul Offit, to the public's attention, and for documenting the early years of Offit's increasingly absurd claims. In this article, Offit asserts that holding vaccine patents, being funded by Merck and having Merck buy and distribute, to physicians, his book extolling the virtues of vaccines, does not compromise his objectivity as a member of the committee that determines what is and is not sound vaccine practice:
“When asked, members of the committee told UPI their potential conflicts do not affect their judgment.
"I am probably just the kind of person you are talking about," said Paul Offit, chief of infectious diseases at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, who was a committee member until last month. At the same time, he shared a patent for another rotavirus vaccine. Merck has funded Offit's research for 13 years.
"I am a co-holder of a patent for a (rotavirus) vaccine. If this vaccine were to become a routinely recommended vaccine, I would make money off of that," Offit said. "When I review safety data, am I biased? That answer is really easy: absolutely not."
"Is there an unholy alliance between the people who make recommendations about vaccines and the vaccine manufacturers? The answer is no.’"
Merck bought and delivers copies of Offit's book, "What Every Parent Should Know About Vaccines," to American doctors. The book has a list price of $14.95.
"Merck Vaccine Division is pleased to present you with a copy of the recent publication, 'What Every Parent Should Know about Vaccines,'" says a Dear Doctor letter from Merck. "The authors designed the book to answer questions parents have about vaccines and to dispel misinformation about vaccines that sometimes appears in the public media."
Offit said he does not know how many copies of his book Merck purchased. "I don't have any control over that," he said.”
I encourage you to read the entire article.
However, the specifics and number of CDC vaccine patents are not reviewed there.
Mr. Kennedy repeated the claim last month in an interview with EcoWatch saying, “The CDC is a subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry. The agency owns more than 20 vaccine patents and purchases and sells $4.1 billion in vaccines annually.” Again, no source.
I have been around long enough to know that vaccine claims have to be checked and rechecked. And since this is a very old claim, one that I would like to be able to state (if it is true), I decided to review it.
I am fortunate to have, as one of my partners in advocacy, fellow autism parent Mark Blaxill, an Intellectual Property expert who has been employed by billion dollar corporations to manage their patents. Blaxill was the man who found out that HHS, through NIH, owns patents on all HPV vaccines, and receives a percentage of the profits for each dose of Gardasil and Cervarix administered anywhere in the world. He published the stunning revelation in a detailed three part expose entitled, “A License to Kill? Part 1: How A Public-Private Partnership Made the Government Merck’s Gardasil Partner.”
When I contacted Blaxill to ask how to run a patent search, he was kind enough to do it for me. He found 57 granted US patents with the CDC listed as an assignee. You can see the search results here.
Upon cursory review of the patents, I found that one did not seem applicable to vaccination, but merely referenced an article on vaccination. That leaves us with 56 CDC patents to scrutinize.
Here is what I found.
There are CDC patents applicable to vaccines for Flu, Rotavirus, Hepatitis A, HIV, Anthrax, Rabies, Dengue fever, West Nile virus, Group A Strep, Pneumococcal disease, Meningococcal disease, RSV, Gastroenteritis, Japanese encephalitis, SARS, Rift Valley Fever, and chlamydophila pneumoniae.
There is a CDC patent for “Nucleic acid vaccines for prevention of flavivirus infection,” which has applications in vaccines for Zika, West Nile virus, Dengue fever, tick-borne encephalitis virus, yellow fever, Palm Creek virus, and Parramatta River virus.
CDC also has several patents for administering various ”shots” via aerosol delivery systems for vaccines.
There's a CDC patent on a process for vaccine quality control by “quantifying proteins in a complex preparation of uni- or multivalent commercial or research vaccine preparations.”
There's a CDC patent on a method “for producing a model for evaluating the antiretroviral effects of drugs and vaccines.”
CDC has a patent for companies who want to test their respiratory system applicable vaccine on an artificial lung system.
If a vaccine maker is concerned that their vaccine might contain a human rhinovirus, CDC has a patent on a process for determining if such contamination exists.
CDC has a patent on an assay to assist vaccine makers in finding antigen-specific antibodies in a biological sample.
CDC holds a patent that provides vaccine makers with a method of "reducing the replicative fitness of a pathogen by deoptimizing codons." Asserting that, "pathogens with deoptimized codons can be used to increase the phenotypic stability of attenuated vaccines."
The agency also holds a patent on adjuvants for a vaccine used on premature infants and young babies.
There is a CDC patent to cover a vaccine for an infection induced by a tape worm found in pork.
They even have patents that cover vaccines for animal illnesses including Canarypox virus, Fowlpox virus, Sealpox virus, dog flu and monkey cancer.
Does this seem like a public health agency making “independent” vaccine recommendations, or a private company with an impressive portfolio to which one might look for investment opportunities?
The CDC is reputed to be an independent government agency making vaccine recommendations to the public, only for the public good. They are the agency charged with vaccine safety oversight, via their Immunization Safety Office.
Here is how the office describes its charge:
“CDC's Immunization Safety Office plays a vital role in ensuring our nation’s vaccine safety.
Sound immunization policies affecting children and adults in the U.S. depend on continuous monitoring of the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. CDC uses many strategies to assess vaccine safety, to identify health problems possibly related to vaccines, and to conduct studies that help determine whether a health problem is caused by a specific vaccine. CDC also works with other federal government agencies and other stakeholders to determine the appropriate public health response to vaccine safety concerns and to communicate the benefits and risks of vaccines.
The Immunization Safety Office regularly reports on vaccine safety monitoring findings and any concerns to CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). This advisory group develops the recommended vaccine schedule for children and adults in the U.S. ACIP considers the safety and effectiveness of vaccines before making recommendations to the vaccine schedule or changing recommendations for vaccine use.”
Note that they proudly state that they report to the ACIP - the same committee on which Paul Offit infamously served, as if this reporting somehow adds legitimacy to their vaccine safety work. The same committee that Congress has excoriated for their long history of conflicts of interests.
Nowhere on the CDC's web site can I find the disclosure that the agency is a profit partner with the vaccine makers for whom it is supposed to be providing safety oversight.
Mr. Kennedy is in very safe territory by reporting that the CDC has over 20 patents that create vast, undisclosed conflicts of interests in vaccine safety. He is understating the problem by more than half.
This brief look at current patents held by the CDC deserves an in-depth review to determine exactly what current financial relationships with vaccine makers now exist and what the current impact those revenue streams are likely having on vaccine safety positions. Furthermore, one must closely look at the financial relationships between the CDC and vaccine makers it is currently courting, to include the potential exploitation of new patents for financial gain. These are merely a few lines of inquiry, among hundreds, needing to be examined and why the potential RFK commission on vaccine safety must be impaneled.
No wonder the vaccine industry (and let's not kid ourselves, CDC IS the vaccine industry) and their media outlets are fighting with such a fury to prevent the #RFKcommission from being formed.
Fortunately, Mr. Kennedy has already said he will fight this corruption against our children until his last breath, and we seem to have a new president who doesn't care what Pharma and the mainstream media throw at him. There is more than 20 years’ worth of documented abuse and corruption in the vaccine program that, if properly examined, would at the very least force reforms that would drastically reduce the profits of the industry.
The vaccine business is currently a $30 billion per year industry in which organizations like the World Health Organization have urged increased investment, projecting that it will become a $100 billion per year industry by 2025. Thus, it is evident that the CDC and their business partners need the public to not only be okay with the 69 doses of recommended childhood vaccines, but to begin to adhere to the additional 100 plus doses of vaccines recommended by the new adult schedule, and to be ready to inject their families with the additional 271 vaccines in the development pipeline.
That profit boom can't happen if the corruption in the industry, and the vast, unassessed damage that it has done to the health of children (and now adults) is laid open for all to finally see. The $30 billion per year industry will become a sub $10 billion per year industry, with a cap on how much it can make. Because there is a cap on how much the human body can process.
We must continue to press the Trump administration for comprehensive vaccine safety review and reform, including the universal right to forgo any and all vaccines without coercion.
Without a White House to ignore CDC's abuses and run interference with the American public, the corrupt vaccine industry may be turning into a paper tiger, and its media simply a powerless crowd of bullies with a megaphone, broadcasting “sound and fury signifying nothing.”
For evidence-based research on vaccinations, visit the GreenMedInfo.com Research Dashboard.
FAKE DOCTORS PAID TO PEDDLE JABS ON TIKTOK
NEWS: WORLD NEWS
Agency recruits actors posing as GPs to combat 'conspiracy theories'
MANCHESTER, England (ChurchMilitant.com) - A prestigious social media marketing group is paying amateur actors to impersonate medical doctors and promote the COVID-19 experimental vaccine on TikTok — the Chinese-owned video-sharing social network.
The Manchester-based company KOMI is inviting actors to participate in a TikTok social media project — "filming yourself from home as if you're making multiple Tik Toks about COVID conspiracy theories."
"The aim is to make this [as] believable as possible, as if you're a Tik Tok doctor," advised the advertisement posted on Mandy.com — an international website advertising jobs for actors, performers, filmmakers and production personnel.
The job description requests respondents to impersonate a "GP [general practitioner] talking about COVID-19 and the conspiracy theories surrounding it." A £100 fee is offered to successful actors.
Under Section 49(1) of Britain's Medical Act of 1983, it is a criminal offense to "wilfully and falsely pretend" to be a doctor.
KOMI says it will provide actors with the scripts and require actors pretending to be doctors to make five short video clips "filming [themselves] in selfie mode." Actors will need to film each clip in a different location and wear different clothing for each clip.
"The filming/lighting/sound doesn't have to be perfect; filming on your phone is perfectly fine," notes the advertisement, giving Sunday as the closing date for submissions.
The edited videos will be posted on the channel "It's Gone Viral," a social media brand owned and operated by KOMI Group Ltd., with 8.2 million followers on Facebook, 2.3 million on TikTok and 410,000 on Instagram.
News Media and Social Media Colluding
Popular British writer and broadcaster Bev Turner told Church Militant she "became aware of actors taking part in media news coverage as pictures would come up on social media — maybe somebody's profile from a casting agency next to a video of that person in a hospital bed wearing a mask."
The media personality said she "didn't really believe this to be true" because she "believed in the integrity of the British news outlets." An actress friend who does extra work told Turner this couldn't be true but was alerted "to watch out for any requests for auditions."
Turner confirmed that her actress friend, who is on the mailing list for Mandy.com, got the email recruiting actors to be doctors debunking conspiracy theories for a fee of £100. Her friend agreed it was "very dishonest" as actors were "not meant to impersonate doctors to convince young people to think a certain way."
Turner elaborated:
If these dishonest videos get shown, they are deliberately misleading young people. As someone who's worked in media for 22 years, it is a terrible indication of misinformation that's going on in Britain. We know social media isn't always honest, but we don't expect a nicely edited video of actors pretending to be GPs.
When social media giants are shutting down "misinformation" accounts that show adverse reactions to the jab or naming alternative treatments like ivermectin, how come they are fine with allowing fake doctors? It means that open and honest debate is a thing of the past.
Peer-reviewed medical journals have noted the potential of "harnessing" TikTok to convey important public health messages, especially among those who are 13–24 years of age.
A total of 100 videos uploaded by the pro-vaccine World Health Organization (WHO) and posted under the hashtag "#Coronavirus" were viewed 1,194,081,700 times.
Researchers observed that 100 trending videos with the hashtag "#WearAMask" garnered almost 500 million views, and 32 videos on mask-wearing posted by WHO got almost 57 million views.
However, a peer-reviewed study on the psychology of TikTok use warned that "TikTok users are often adolescents and therefore form a group of potentially vulnerable individuals."
Grooming a Generation
In comments to Church Militant, health ethicist Dr. Niall McCrae noted that "the latest development, deploying actors as fake doctors in a campaign against vaccine skeptics, is troubling" and "will harm trust in doctors, reinforcing a hateful division in society between the compliant majority and the minority of freethinkers."
Dr. McCrae continued:
After spending my career in health practice, teaching and research, I am horrified by how long-established ethical and scientific standards are being cast aside by the COVID regime. These paid actors will be like the Pied Piper of Hamelin, luring younger people into a genetic engineering project masquerading as a lifesaving vaccine.
The merry tune will drown out evidence of serious adverse reactions including inflammation of the heart and blood clots. Instead of being informed that the jabs are experimental and ineffectual against coronavirus, and that boosters will be required every few months, young people are being brainwashed into demonizing cautious and rational fellow citizens as "anti-vaxxers." In short, they are being enlisted into a cult.
KOMI has not revealed who its client is and who is paying it to produce the videos, but the project coincides with the British government's new campaign to vaccinate 16- and 17-year-old children with the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
The government's Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI), chaired by Prof. Wei Shen Lim, announced the drive Wednesday. Lim has received direct funding of over £25,000 for his work with Pfizer, constituting a potential conflict of interest.
The professor confirmed that children aged 16 and over can be vaccinated without parental consent.
Peddling Vaccinations Is Lucrative
Meanwhile, the contract for actors to pose as doctors is estimated to be lucrative, as the KOMI group announced its turnover hit a million pounds for the first time in 2020 and that it aims to double that figure over the next 12 months.
Since the start of the COVID-19 crisis, KOMI has won major contracts with brands including SWAN, Mars Pets and The Flava People. It has also distributed video content and viral campaign advertisements for BBC Films, O2, Universal, Bud Light and Disney.
The company delivers an average of over one billion views across its portfolio of pages each month, with ARK Media handling the licensing and distribution of KOMI's content for use across editorial, TV production and brand/advertisement segments.
Church Militant contacted KOMI by email and phone but did not receive a response as of press time. ARK Media also did not respond to a request for comment.
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/fake-doctors-paid-to-peddle-vaccine-on-tiktok
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/08/exposes-fake-doctors-pushing-jab-cdc-says-pregnant-women-should-inoculate/?utm_source=home-headline
STEW PETERS SHOW
EXPOSED! FAKE DOCTORS Pushing Jab! CDC Says Pregnant Women Should Inoculate
The Stew Peters Show
Breaking NOW: FAKE Doctors have been exposed, being used by big tech to push the fear campaign surrounding the virus, and ‘recommend’ that everyone, especially youth, get inoculated with the euthanasia shot.
Also: CDC Has now announced that pregnant and breastfeeding women are safe to (and should) get JABBED!
DeAnna Lorraine joined Stew to discuss.
Follow Stew on social media.
See all of Stew’s content at StewPeters.TV
Watch full episodes here.
Check out Stew’s store.
Support our efforts to keep truth alive.
Advertise with Red Voice Media
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.
Please do your own research. The information I share is only a catalyst to expanding ones confined consciousness. I have NO desire for anyone to blindly believe or agree with what I share. Seek the truth for yourself and put your own puzzle together that has been presented to you. I'm not here to teach, preach or lead, but rather assist in awakening the consciousness of the collective from its temporary dormancy.
CDC Stats: 1,270 Premature Fetal Deaths Following COVID Shots – Still Recommends Pregnant Women Get COVID Injections
The U.S. CDC announced today that they have “new data” that they claim shows that the COVID-19 experimental injections are now safe for pregnant women.
Of course they have been recommending all along that pregnant women get the experimental injections, so it appears that this is just a new marketing strategy to get more pregnant women to get the shots.
The CDC admits that this “new study” of nearly 2,500 pregnant women who received an mRNA COVID-19 injection before 20 weeks of pregnancy had 13% of them suffer miscarriages.
the known severe risks of COVID-19 during pregnancy demonstrate that the benefits of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine for pregnant people outweigh any known or potential risks. (Source.)
A search of the CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) lists 1,270 premature fetal deaths in pregnant women following one of the experimental, non-FDA approved COVID-19 injections. (Source.)
As we have previously reported here at Health Impact News, a pro-life group out of New Mexico has reported that a whistleblower who sits on a COVID-19 task force is claiming that many pregnancy complications, including preterm birth, miscarriage, and spontaneous abortions following COVID vaccines are being concealed from the public.
This whistleblower has uncovered documents that Pfizer had supplied to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) that shows their mRNA COVID vaccines did have animal trials that showed serious birth defects occurred in the rat specimens.
Also, at the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) last quarterly meeting, on March 4, 2021, the CDC supplied a report on “Maternal vaccination safety summary” for the COVID vaccines that had been granted emergency use authorization.
You can view it here.
The CDC’s own report stated:
Maternal Vaccination Safety Summary
* Pregnant women were not specifically included in pre-authorization clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines
– Post-authorization safety monitoring and research are the primary ways to obtain safety data on COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy
* Larger than expected numbers of self-reported pregnant women have registered in v-safe
* The reactogenicity profile and adverse events observed among pregnant women in v-safe did not indicate any safety problems
* Most reports to VAERS among pregnant women (73%) involved non-pregnancy specific adverse events (e.g., local and systemic reactions)
* Miscarriage was the most frequently reported pregnancy-specific adverse event to VAERS; numbers are within the known background rates based on presumed COVID-19 vaccine doses administered to pregnant women
So even though there were “larger than expected numbers of self-reported pregnant women” reporting adverse reactions to the experimental vaccines, and even though “miscarriage was the most frequently reported pregnancy-specific adverse event,” the CDC concluded that this “did not indicate any safety problems.”
And that is what they are doing with this study, which they admit caused miscarriages in 13% of the women.
They brush all these fetal deaths aside by stating:
the known severe risks of COVID-19 during pregnancy demonstrate that the benefits of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine for pregnant people outweigh any known or potential risks. (Source.)
But what exactly are these “benefits” of receiving a COVID-19 “vaccine” that “outweigh the risks?” They admit they don’t stop transmission, they admit you can still get COVID-19 after being vaccinated, and they admit that people who are fully vaccinated are still dying.
Do You Trust The CDC?
As we have reported numerous times here at Health Impact News, the CDC is a corrupt organization that cannot be trusted. They are the largest purchaser and distributor of vaccines in the world, allocating over $5 BILLION in their budget (supplied by American taxpayers) each year to purchase and distribute vaccines from Big Pharma.
The CDC also owns over 56 patents on vaccines, and many of their scientists earn royalties from the sale of vaccines. (Source.)
The CDC has a long history of corruption, and over the years many of their own scientists have tried to blow the whistle on this corruption only to be silenced.
In addition, many of the directors running the CDC go on to work for Big Pharma developing vaccines after they complete their term at the CDC.
The CDC protects the pharmaceutical industry. They get caught lying all the time. They are not your friend, they don’t care about your health, and they don’t care if your unborn baby lives or dies.
By Brian Shilhavy, Health Impact News / Reference: CDC.gov
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.